Creation of a free Mentoring platform : would YOU be interested ?

@Rockinmi said in #40:
> Hi, which club do you belong to? I'd like to take a look.

R2GM (Road to Great Mindset).

-Jordan

@Akbar2thegreat said in #31:
> So according to that logic Carlsen isn't number 1, right? Or that he doesn't deserve it?
> That goes against your thinking.
> Think it again!

I don't know what sort of flawed logic you are using there.

It's a fact carlsen is number 1
It's a fact carlsen has a coach called Peter Heine Nielsen

These aren't opinions that can be debated. These are facts.

You may as well be debating whether the international country code for america is +1. Just google it, mate.

I'd be interested if you promise to stop trying to be me

I strongly say that this is a great idea and would help in as much of ways as I can so that we can learn and improve, when we teach others we learn at the same time too. I absolutely love this idea. Please do create a such website.

Thanks
Inferno_123

PS. I will help as much as I can do DM me if you need some help, if I can do it I will surely do so. Great idea I'm pretty sure it's gonna success if you do it!

Ping : @Misho_Tal
Very sorry if I disturbed you with the ping.

Thanks again

@Akbar2thegreat said in #37:
> That's why I am debating, don't you get it?
I was never debating for who gets the credit ,its just unfair to say that highest rated player doesnt need any traning/coaches when it helps them to countinue being highest rated/become world champion/retain world champion title

Fantastic Idea, id be really interested in something like that.

Sure thing. We would like that. Playing chess is even fun when it's about learning.

This sort of mentoring did exist fo Go for over 20 years
gtl.xmp.net/
mostly game review by players stronger than you. Back then go computer analysis was useless or detrimental i.e stronger plaer looking you game was pretty much only way of analyzing games.

In chess much of 'why this is a bad move' can sorted out by computer quickly enough making analysis by player who is not LOT stronger than you quite useless.

Dunno maybe it could work

@Ben10Tenyson said in #45:
> I was never debating for who gets the credit ,its just unfair to say that highest rated player doesnt need any traning/coaches when it helps them to countinue being highest rated/become world champion/retain world champion title

Why unfair? A player can become highest rated by themselves without any coaching/mentoring by anyone. How would you explain that case. And what logic do you use to say that highest rated player 'needs' a coach as well? Being coached is optional and not compulsory!

@Akbar2thegreat said in #49:
> Why unfair? A player can become highest rated by themselves without any coaching/mentoring by anyone. How would you explain that case. And what logic do you use to say that highest rated player 'needs' a coach as well? Being coached is optional and not compulsory!
Well all highest rated chess player till now had coaches.. morphy,capablanca,alekhine knew rules of chess via his father in this case their father would be their first coach ..its impossible to learn chess without help of other persons