Please extend the size of the blacklist.

It is an assumption but a quite logical one. The blocklist is saved server side.

If it is implemented well, that means, it has to be loaded once per session and then, on each request everything related to that list is checked against that list in your browser. Maybe more than once per request.

If it is implemented not so well, or if it is not possible to do it in the browser, then this calculation has to be done server side.

Im 99% sure that it is a size restriction for technical reasons.

And if you are for changes and not for regression, change the way you communicate with people and you dont need such a huge block list.

There is no factual difference between the rated and casual games. Both do not provide anything material. It's just about what feels fair. Because I always give rematches myself. I expect another players to do the same to me. The fair part is that I won't quit with 5:4 score. I will let another player to either tie to 5:5, either "lose" with 6:4. While another players leave at 5:4. It simply feels unfair.

mass attack this guy, he won't be able to block you

@Linnemann, I do change the way I communicate with people: I allow fair rematches. I let rematches at 5:4 to give my opponent a chance to recoup. You regress this fairness, and also regress by applying the word "changes" sophistically.

i think people should be able to block whoever they want to block.

like for instance, the guy above me.

oops by "theguy above me" i was refering to katakamata

hahaha what do you know? hes already on my blocklist

Ok. :)

i wasnt refering to you m8

read above

Yes, I've edited that. :)