I was going to play with the user Amateur99 who, apparently, has been reported to me, because you do not agree with my rating ELO and so I have been accused of using chess programs.
Now, I see that the 2026 ELO points, which is referential, have dropped me hata 1500, while 99 has the 1800 Amateur.
Is it fair?
I hope the page admistradores correct the injustice.
Now don't do it again.
:D Nice picture...
"have dropped me hata 1500, while 99 has the 1800 Amateur."
Jealous, much?
So that's your motive.
The reason is that he has lost against "cheaters". And without presenting evidence, the only thing left is that he seeks to harm players with better ELO.
Oh boy. Bobbymaniaco. Just stop. You're the most generic type of cheater out there. About 20-30 of you a day turn up on this site and all do the exact same thing. The only thing they have above you is that they accept that they got caught and move on.
I saw this and now have a question - How do you know whether or not someone is using a chess program? What can you use as sufficient evidence?
If Bobbymaniaco was, in fact, cheating, then he must be aware of the confusion surrounding that question and is trying to exploit it, and answering the question will prove wrong.
I did not want to participate in this discussion, but cheater 'won'! What is your problem? Do you even know what you're talking about? For players of the 2050 points I thought you were smarter! You seem like a spoiled child.. Respect for the opponent and fair play are things you do not understand. And you should know that no matter how careful you are you will always be caught! You can not hide behind your 'casual games'!
Cheers,
There are additional moderator tools that we use as evidence to determine if a player is cheating. But you can see most of the information for yourself. Take a look at these recent games from Bobbymaniaco:
-
http://en.lichess.org/analyse/n63yecmq/black-
http://en.lichess.org/analyse/rys4xi5w/black-
http://en.lichess.org/analyse/gq8cghbu/black-
http://en.lichess.org/analyse/6e8iapmg/black-
http://en.lichess.org/analyse/rh39zfwx/black-
http://en.lichess.org/analyse/t8pbgzooNot only does every single one of them have near perfect play. They all have the very consistent* move-times between 5-15 seconds, and there are absolutely no fast moves. This is not what you expect from a normal player.
A normal player will have a few perfect games - more if they're good. The duration of time that they spend on each move will also vary - some moves you need to take a deep think about, others you play in an instant (like openings, or moving out of check).
In addition to this, our moderator tools confirm practically 100% that Bobbymaniaco was cheating. And now he's chucking a tantrum on the forums because someone reported him.
*Inconsistencies are generally down to human response time as the player has to load the move into their engine, wait for the engine to settle on a good move, and then play the move).
Of course Clarkey, all of this is strong evidence and you and I both know that! It's funny how he pretends he does not know what it is and that he is innocent! I think, because the players like him lichess needs to take a more radical solution then just reset him.
Cheers,