puzzles v2: ratings

This is great! Such a nice feature. What would make it even better would be to get ratings for each category. That way I can focus on my weakest areas.

When I started playing chess solving, Checkmate in 1, helped me pretty good. Maybe one day there is for the "Queensgambit" player the possibility to solve a huge amount of #1 (without answering forum posts).
The #1 puzzles help understand and memorize how the pieces can move...
:-)

puzzles seem much more easy in this V2 :D

Speaking of the rating - will the rating curve ever update on my profile?

I've done puzzles across the whole day and my new atomic rating is recorded as well, but I'm still waiting for my graph to display my current puzzle rating of 2453

Do you plan make rating per topic or only general rating?

1. I don’t like the response, “That is not the move!” Geez. Lighten up. Lose the exclamation at least. It’s not only overly dramatic (even scolding) but your puzzles often have multiple winning moves, so “the move” is annoying. “Nope, try again” or “Sorry, try again is better.”
2. I also don’t like the thumbs up or down voting. Too oversimplified. Often I have mixed feelings. I find it annoying when a good puzzle ends with the other side giving up a queen prematurely, for example, instead of playing out a cool line. Besides, some puzzles are too complex to judge without checking an engine. yes/no tells you none of that. So at last have a “not sure” or “undecided” option.

Hello. I have a QUESTION. Several days ago, when I reached a rating about 2850 in puzzles, my rating became provided with a question mark (as for newbies, although there wasn't this earlier). Today I reached 3000, I solved more than 200 puzzles at all, but the question mark remains. What does it mean? And is there a leaderboard for puzzle solvers? I can't found this. It's interesting how many points the leaders in puzzles have.

Could some puzzles be changed manually?
some puzzle would be better with

Suboptimal moves:
lichess.org/training/PN4QS
lichess.org/training/6zu7i
lichess.org/training/HjHlE (Ok example)

More moves:
lichess.org/training/zdDAm
lichess.org/training/sV4re
lichess.org/training/VqgO3 (this one needs Re8 then Qg7, where Qf7 is "also good", Qg5 just repeats so "eh")

Less moves:
lichess.org/training/KI2vn
lichess.org/training/N7jsA

Maybe "Kingside Attack" and "Queenside Attack" should be combined into "Attack"?

It would be nice to provide feedback for puzzles. In particular, the rating of the puzzle. Maybe a dropdown before I thumbs up/down that has the general level (1800, 1900, etc) and I can change it I think it's higher or lower. Prior to v2, there were some puzzles that I thought were overrate and some I thought were underrated. Just collect the data and when, on average, it seems like everyone agrees it's something else, then it goes on a queue to be examined.

For example, lichess.org/training/p0ioa seems way overrated for such a simple skewer. I've actually gotten some v2 puzzles WRONG because the obvious move seemed, well, too obvious.

How do you know that it's overrated? I can't see its amount of likes and dislikes. Also it's just been played 7 times right now.

And yes, regardless whether v1 or v2, some puzzles are excellent at fooling you