lichess.org
Donate

CNN admits that russian sanctions are total failure, Russia unstoppable economically.

It does not take much exposure to reasonable opposition to western actions on the war in ukraine to hear things such as: "The russian ruble is stronger now than it was years ago-The sanctions hurt the west more than they hurt russia". the analysis these anti-war people have been giving is that the economic sanctions are a joke, that they are save facing and don't change practical reality, or that they are extreme and unhinged (in the case of destroying private property rights). and their prediction is that the west will feel more economic pain than russia, and that the sanctions will not stop russia.
Now for the first time you see mainstream news admitting this analysis. here is the article: "edition.cnn.com/2022/06/26/business/russia-oil-sanctions-g7/index.html"

and here are a few highlights:

> Europe and the United States have barred the import of Russian oil to cut off a crucial revenue source for the Kremlin. But the plan to pile pain on President Vladimir Putin, forcing him to reconsider his war in Ukraine, hasn't worked.

> Russia is making just as much money from energy exports as it was before it invaded in late February. Meanwhile, inflation is surging globally, adding to political pressure on leaders such as US President Joe Biden, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and French President Emmanuel Macron.

> Several measures are being discussed, from price caps on Russian energy imports, centralized purchasing by the European Union, insurance bans on ships and targeting countries that continue to buy from Moscow. They all have downsides, and some could push prices even higher — risking popular support for the West's resolve to punish Putin.

> "There are tools available to go harder after Russia, but they come with significant costs directly to consumers in the US and Europe," said Robert Johnston, an adjunct senior research scholar at the Columbia Center for Global Energy Policy.
> Imposing sanctions on countries that continue to scoop up large volumes of Russian crude oil, including China and India, would wreak havoc on global markets that are already under severe strain. And while Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen recently said the United States wants to discuss a cap on the price of Russian oil, such a complex mechanism may not be the fix the West is looking for.
> Russian oil exports to Europe dropped to 3.3 million barrels per day in May, falling by 170,000 barrels per day compared to the previous month, according to the International Energy Agency.
> But an uptick in exports to Asia helped make up for a large chunk of those losses. China — taking advantage of huge price discounts — saw its imports reach 2 million barrels per day for the first time. India's imports have also spiked, hovering near 900,000 barrels per day in May.
> Russia is selling barrels of its Urals crude for about $35 cheaper than the Brent global benchmark, which was last trading near $113 per barrel. But because prices are up sharply this year due to the aftershocks of the pandemic and the war, they've still been making tons of money.
> To make it harder for China, India and other countries to keep importing Russian oil, Europe intends to phase in a ban on insuring ships that carry Russian crude. If the United Kingdom joins in, as expected, that would deal a blow to the global system for transporting fuel, given the dominance of the Lloyd's of London insurance market. The Biden administration is nervous the measure will cause prices to soar.
> But such a move would generate so much turmoil that experts view it as unlikely — especially given the growing political blowback leaders in the West face over the fastest price increases in decades.
> If China and India had to find replacement barrels, the price of oil could easily top $200 per barrel, according to Darwei Kung, portfolio manager for commodities at DWS.
> "It's hard to see a world where the US puts [such] sanctions on Iran and Venezuela and Russia at the same time," Johnston said. "The oil has to come from somewhere."

You should read the entire article to get a better picture, it is a long article and it goes over multiple things. but the conclusion remains clear. Russia is raking in the dough, and the only way that you could stop that is if you sanction BOTH india and china, the two biggest countries in terms of population and two of the top economies.
It seems that the west has dropped the ball, their characterization of russia as "a gas station masquerading as a country" is incorrect, but in their arrogance they have overplayed their hand, and now they are going to pay for it.
What a...
Global economy.
Clarity's just around the corner no doubt.
Sponsored by the nikkei index.
@TheMuffinMan2000 said in #1:
> "The russian ruble is stronger now than it was years ago".
Can you explain why the ruble has strengthened so much?
Can you explain what is the beauty of the strengthening of the ruble?
For example, gadgets, or Italian shoes, or Japanese cars have fallen in price in Russia?
Or have trips to London become cheaper?
Maybe now it will be easier to buy a turnkey semiconductor factory?
Or at least equipment for oil production?

Recently at the St. Petersburg Economic Forum (international!) this problem was discussed - what to do with a strong ruble. CNN didn't say anything about it?
People Europe and Puppets are still buying oil from Russia.
They are still in the international banking system Europe won't kick then out.
They Europe can't afford to displease the oil supply.
Russia has achieved all objectives the next stop all its lost territory.
What an absolute joke. The next step is total desolation, destitution and dissolution.

"In particular, Russia lacks a diversified economy, a vibrant entrepreneurial class, the rule of law and a stable business environment that can support a fast economic turnaround. In addition, this crisis has sparked Russian anti-Western and isolationist rhetoric that makes Moscow’s road to recovery significantly more difficult.

Putin’s pursuit of greater imperial glory has brought an unrelenting stream of bad economic news. The dramatic collapse of the price of oil means a decline in state revenues and less money for Putin’s ambitious military and social spending projects. Along with the ruble sinking, inflation is rising and capital flight has soared to record highs.

The only good news is that the Russian budget is in balance. That only occurred, however, because the government is paying its bills with cheaper rubles. It is never a good sign when the finance minister announces that he needs a backup budget since the proposed 2015-17 budget is already obsolete. (It is based on an oil price of $100 per barrel.)

Though Russia has discussed the merits of diversification beyond oil for decades, it has never bothered to implement the strategy. Russian domestic producers are thus in no position to take advantage of a falling ruble because, other than natural resources, they have relatively little to sell abroad.

But even if foreign markets remain out of reach, a falling currency theoretically should stimulate domestic production if only because foreign goods inevitably will become too expensive for Russian consumers. Moscow has heralded its food sanctions — which ban the import of European Union and U.S. meat, fruit and vegetables — as just such a chance to force Russians to buy local produce.

Yet Russian businessmen and women have been so over-regulated — and over-prosecuted — that the Russian entrepreneur has become an endangered species. Indeed, an amnesty last year revealed tens of thousands of business leaders in jail on essentially trumped-up charges. Despite much fanfare, only a relative trickle of people was eventually released.

Because government fiscal policy and a dysfunctional legal system won’t allow small- and medium-sized businesses to lead Russia out of recession, that leaves Russia’s big state corporations — the bedrock of Putin’s policy of state capitalism — to show the way. Thanks to sanctions, however, Russian companies and banks are busy seeking bailouts, not new markets."

www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/putins-created-economic-crisis-and-left-moscow-no-easy-way-out

Russia's world economics == toast.

How much wheat didn't get planted?

"Igor Sechin, chairman of the state oil company Rosneft, recently announced, for example, that what is good for Rosneft is good for Russia — and asked for $49 billion from the National Welfare Fund, one of Russia’s major rainy day funds.

Putin’s finance minister has already announced that Rosneft won’t get that much. But the collective demands for hard currency — from the central bank’s interventions to defend the ruble to Putin’s big spending plans for Crimea — are putting strong pressures on Russian financial reserves, which are already down 13 percent this year. Moscow is busy spending money, and no one knows when it will stop.

One last economic option available to most struggling economies — increased foreign direct investment — is largely off the table here thanks to the sanctions and Russia’s inhospitable business climate.

The Kremlin recently announced, however, that it intends to make a bad situation worse. Much of Russia’s foreign investments represent money returning from Russians living abroad. Yet now the finance ministry wants companies registered offshore and owned (50 percent or more) or potentially controlled (25 percent or more) by Russian citizens to pay taxes in Russia.

Why Russian businesses would want to expose their offshore earnings to Russian taxes once they have gone through the trouble of transferring their money out of the country remains a big mystery. Ironically, Putin had intended to use Russia’s chairmanship of the G-8 to lead a global fight against tax havens and offshore banking. But Russia is no longer a member of the G-8, and Putin must pursue his strategy of “de-offshorization” alone and with little chance of success."

_

*Putin* has destroyed much. Continues to destroy more.

The Russians who are dying in the Ukraine do not want to be there.
The mothers of the ones who have died certainly wish them back;
The ones who are still fighting can live if the people in Russia demand and end to this brutality and insanity, and do so with enough force to make it happen.

You on the other hand are doing everything to confuse, deceive and obfuscate the issue.

"Bring our boys home" is something you should be chanting, rather than "Death to the West" or whatever it is you keep putting in your brain.
If all this ducky dunk was true CNN (Crappy News Network) Russia won't have to talk about it.
"In 2001 olena nazarenko’s father started farming in Lukashivka, a small village about 100km north of Kyiv, with three cows and a horse called Rosa (”Dew” in Ukrainian). In 2020 Mrs Nazarenko and her husband Andriy inherited the 400-hectare (1,000-acre) farm, now named Rosa after that founding horse. Early this year they took out a substantial loan to cover fertiliser for the coming spring-wheat crop.

On March 9th, well before they had planted any, Russian troops occupied the village and the couple fled. On March 31st, when the invaders had turned tail, they returned. It was a harsh homecoming. The main farm building was shelled out. Three tractors had been vandalised and their diesel drained. Of their 117 cows, 42 were dead and the rest were roaming fields littered with debris, mines, mortar shells, unexploded cluster bombs and burnt-out trucks. Fifty tonnes of wheat, sunflower seed and rye had been destroyed, costing them tens of thousands of dollars. “We have no money left,” says Mrs Nazarenko. “We have nothing to pay salaries and are struggling to pay interest on the loan.”"

Why are you arguing for madness, insanity, hatred and death?

www.economist.com/briefing/2022/05/19/a-world-grain-shortage-puts-tens-of-millions-at-risk

.
.
Now you will be telling us The Ukrainians ate all the wheat.
.
Go ahead and please tell us the Ukrainians all the harvest.
(this is sarcasm.)
"The external environment for the Russian economy remains challenging and significantly constrains economic activity. The contraction in imports due to the introduction of external trade and financial restrictions is considerably outstripping the decline in exports."
[via June 10 Central Bank of Russia Press Release]

The Russians certainly think those ineffective sanctions are having serious effects, don't they?
@PTX187 said in #4:
> Can you explain why the ruble has strengthened so much?
> Can you explain what is the beauty of the strengthening of the ruble?
> For example, gadgets, or Italian shoes, or Japanese cars have fallen in price in Russia?
> Or have trips to London become cheaper?
> Maybe now it will be easier to buy a turnkey semiconductor factory?
> Or at least equipment for oil production?
>
> Recently at the St. Petersburg Economic Forum (international!) this problem was discussed - what to do with a strong ruble. CNN didn't say anything about it?

Ruble collapses at the start of the war: "LOL the Russian economy has collapsed"
Ruble at strongest in 7 years a few months after the war: "LOL the russian economy is collapsing"

Information is only as valuable as it's ability to predict future events, the people who said that the russian economy would collapse months ago are not saying it's impossible for it to collapse without also collapsing every other economy.
Meanwhile the people who have said for months that the sanctions are ineffective, or that they will backfire, or that the sanctions aren't even real (because of sanction evasion techniques. eg. india buying oil from russia for cheap and then selling it to europeans) have accurately predicted the trend.

now it is not to say that a strong currency does not have it's problems. but what does it say about the economic trend that a country whose currency lost half of it's value, only to regain it's value and then some a few months later? does it mean that this country's economy will collapse? this is just one aspect of the debate and yet if you logically went through these facts you would have predicted the same things CNN is now saying, at least 3 months before they did. remember all of this became clear in late march.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.