Yes I meant what you said. Simple logic error.
"I found it by looking at the last game that lost you 16 rating points, examined it/opponent's profile, and found the above info"
Well, @Jacob531 that was a good way to figure out. Some sort of lateral thinking. "Keep it simple", huh?
I honestly could care less about losing that game or even losing the points/strake in the tournament or the classical rating points...
It kinda felt bad that i congratz him/her, cause i found her queen sacrifice both stunning and lovely. I was happy for my opponent. Damn...
Anyhow, i really love this site. And seems that to cheat in here you gotta do SO-MUCH work, and know chess SO-FREAKING well, that if you arrive to that point of knowledge... really, why to do so? Thanks @Jacob531. Thanks for the help.
:)
Regards!
Well, @Jacob531 that was a good way to figure out. Some sort of lateral thinking. "Keep it simple", huh?
I honestly could care less about losing that game or even losing the points/strake in the tournament or the classical rating points...
It kinda felt bad that i congratz him/her, cause i found her queen sacrifice both stunning and lovely. I was happy for my opponent. Damn...
Anyhow, i really love this site. And seems that to cheat in here you gotta do SO-MUCH work, and know chess SO-FREAKING well, that if you arrive to that point of knowledge... really, why to do so? Thanks @Jacob531. Thanks for the help.
:)
Regards!
Really though, I think it would be a nice feature to actually have the cheater named in that notification: "You lost to a cheater, ___________". I'm guessing this wouldn't be too difficult to implement?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.