lichess.org
Donate
30:00
30:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2c6+0.52d4+0.4d5+0.53e5+0.4Bf5+0.54Nc3+0.2e6+0.25a3+0.1Nd70.06Nf3+0.1c5+0.17Bb5−0.1a60.08Bxd7+−0.2Qxd7−0.19Be3−0.2cxd40.010Bxd4−0.4Rc8−0.311Nh4−0.4Nh6−0.412O-O−0.4Be7−0.413Nf3−1.0O-O−0.614h3−0.4Qc6−0.215Rc1−0.6Bg6−0.616Qe2−0.9Nf5−0.917Rfd1−1.3Bh5??+1.0Blunder. Nxd4 was best.17...Nxd418.Nxd4Qb6[...]18g4+1.0Nxd4+1.019Nxd4+1.0Qb6+1.120gxh5+1.1Qxb2+1.221Nb1??−1.4...Blunder. Na4 was best.21.Na4Qxa322.Nb6[...]21...Bg5−1.522c3??−4.2...Blunder. Nb3 was best.22.Nb3Bxc123.Rxc1[...]22...Bxc1−4.123Qxb2−4.0Bxb2−4.124Ne2−4.0Rc4?−2.4Mistake. Rc6 was best.24...Rc625.a4Ba1[...]25Rd2−2.4Bxc3?!−1.7Inaccuracy. Ba1 was best.25...Ba126.Ra2Re4[...]26Nexc3?!−2.4...Inaccuracy. Nbxc3 was best.26.Nbxc3Rfc827.Rd3[...]26...Rh4−2.427Rd3−2.4Rxh5−2.428f4−2.4Rc8−2.229Ne2−2.3Rc2−2.330Kf2−2.8Rb2−2.131Nd2−2.2Ra2−1.732Nc4?−3.2...Mistake. Kg3 was best.32.Kg3Rh633.Nd4[...]32...g6?−1.7Mistake. g5 was best.32...g533.Nd2gxf4[...]33Nd6−1.6Ra1?!−0.9Inaccuracy. h6 was best.33...h634.Kf1g5[...]34Nxb7−0.8Rh1?!+0.2Inaccuracy. Ra2 was best.34...Ra235Kg2?!−0.8...Inaccuracy. Ng1 was best.35.Ng1g536.f5[...]35...Re1?!−0.1Inaccuracy. Rb1 was best.35...Rb136.Nd6Rb2[...]36Kf20.0Rb10.037Nc5−0.2Rb2−0.238Nxa6−0.6h6−0.339Nc5−0.6g5−0.240Nd7−0.6gxf4??+6.2Blunder. Rh4 was best.40...Rh441.Nf6+Kg7[...]41Nf6++6.1Kg7+5.942Nxh5++5.8
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/zGQpPvhh"] [Date "2016.04.15"] [White "Seb32"] [Black "Petruchio"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "zGQpPvhh"] [UTCDate "2016.04.15"] [UTCTime "23:05:31"] [WhiteElo "1711"] [BlackElo "1490"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+5"] [BlackRatingDiff "-4"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "1800+30"] [ECO "B12"] [Opening "Caro-Kann Defense: Advance Variation, Van der Wiel Attack"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 Bf5 4. Nc3 { B12 Caro-Kann Defense: Advance Variation, Van der Wiel Attack } e6 5. a3 Nd7 6. Nf3 c5 7. Bb5 a6 8. Bxd7+ Qxd7 9. Be3 cxd4 10. Bxd4 Rc8 11. Nh4 Nh6 12. O-O Be7 13. Nf3 O-O 14. h3 Qc6 15. Rc1 Bg6 16. Qe2 Nf5 17. Rfd1 Bh5?? { (-1.31 → 1.00) Blunder. Nxd4 was best. } (17... Nxd4 18. Nxd4 Qb6 19. Nb3 Rc4 20. Rb1 Rfc8 21. Nd2 Rd4 22. Nf3 Rxd1+ 23. Qxd1 h6 24. Na4) 18. g4 Nxd4 19. Nxd4 Qb6 20. gxh5 Qxb2 21. Nb1?? { (1.15 → -1.44) Blunder. Na4 was best. } (21. Na4 Qxa3 22. Nb6 Rc7 23. Qg4 Kh8 24. Ra1 Qc5 25. Rab1 Qa5 26. Rd3 Rg8 27. Qf4 Bc5) 21... Bg5 22. c3?? { (-1.53 → -4.19) Blunder. Nb3 was best. } (22. Nb3 Bxc1 23. Rxc1 Qxb3 24. cxb3 Rxc1+ 25. Kg2 Rxb1 26. Qe3 d4 27. Qg3 h6 28. Qd3 Rb2) 22... Bxc1 23. Qxb2 Bxb2 24. Ne2 Rc4? { (-4.04 → -2.42) Mistake. Rc6 was best. } (24... Rc6 25. a4 Ba1 26. Nd4 Rb6 27. Nc2 Bb2 28. Nd4 a5 29. Nb5 f6 30. exf6 Rxf6 31. Rd2) 25. Rd2 Bxc3?! { (-2.41 → -1.68) Inaccuracy. Ba1 was best. } (25... Ba1 26. Ra2 Re4 27. Kf1 Bxc3 28. Nbxc3 Rxe5 29. h6 gxh6 30. Rb2 b5 31. a4 bxa4 32. Nxa4) 26. Nexc3?! { (-1.68 → -2.43) Inaccuracy. Nbxc3 was best. } (26. Nbxc3 Rfc8 27. Rd3 Rh4 28. f4 Rxh5 29. Kg2 Kf8 30. Nd4 Rh4 31. Kg3 Rh6 32. Nd1 Rc1) 26... Rh4 27. Rd3 Rxh5 28. f4 Rc8 29. Ne2 Rc2 30. Kf2 Rb2 31. Nd2 Ra2 32. Nc4? { (-1.66 → -3.20) Mistake. Kg3 was best. } (32. Kg3 Rh6 33. Nd4 Rg6+ 34. Kh4 f5 35. exf6 Rxf6 36. Kg4 Rg6+ 37. Kf3 Rh6 38. Kg4 Rg6+) 32... g6? { (-3.20 → -1.72) Mistake. g5 was best. } (32... g5 33. Nd2 gxf4 34. Nxf4 Rf5 35. Kf3 Rxe5 36. Ne2 Rf5+ 37. Kg3 Re5 38. Kf2 Rf5+ 39. Kg3) 33. Nd6 Ra1?! { (-1.64 → -0.89) Inaccuracy. h6 was best. } (33... h6 34. Kf1 g5 35. Rg3 Kh7 36. Ne8 Rh4 37. Nd6 Ra1+ 38. Kf2 Ra2 39. fxg5 hxg5 40. Ke1) 34. Nxb7 Rh1?! { (-0.79 → 0.21) Inaccuracy. Ra2 was best. } (34... Ra2) 35. Kg2?! { (0.21 → -0.79) Inaccuracy. Ng1 was best. } (35. Ng1 g5 36. f5 g4 37. Kg2 R1xh3 38. Nxh3 gxh3+ 39. Rxh3 Rxf5 40. Rg3+ Kf8 41. Nc5 Ke7) 35... Re1?! { (-0.79 → -0.13) Inaccuracy. Rb1 was best. } (35... Rb1 36. Nd6 Rb2 37. Kf2 Kf8 38. Rc3 Ra2 39. Re3 Rh4 40. Rf3 Rh5 41. Re3 Rb2 42. Rc3) 36. Kf2 Rb1 37. Nc5 Rb2 38. Nxa6 h6 39. Nc5 g5 40. Nd7 gxf4?? { (-0.56 → 6.15) Blunder. Rh4 was best. } (40... Rh4 41. Nf6+ Kg7 42. Rf3 Kg6 43. Ke1 Rc2 44. Rg3 Ra2 45. Ne8 f5 46. exf6 Kf7 47. Nc7) 41. Nf6+ Kg7 42. Nxh5+ { Black resigns. } 1-0
10
Seb32Petruchio
10
Seb32 +5
2 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
2 Blunders
33 Average centipawn loss
88%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
Petruchio −4
4 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
2 Blunders
47 Average centipawn loss
80%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Caro-Kann Defense: Advance Variation
  1. endrawes0 Shit i will pretty much always take a bishop given the op
  2. MrLegilimens yeah
  3. MrLegilimens damn seb just giving away both bishops for nothign
  4. endrawes0 Not for nothing it seems. I left and came back and it looks like he is winning a bishop
  5. endrawes0 Yup
  6. MrLegilimens well 17. bh5? nxd4
  7. endrawes0 Holy swinging evaluations batman. I misread that.
  8. endrawes0 This is why i play correspondence. I can evaluate and revaluate
  9. endrawes0 Many times over the course of the day
  10. endrawes0 Ggs!
  11. endrawes0 We need to have a moderator round Robin
  12. Seb32 depends on the time control
  13. Seb32 i hate correspondence
  14. Seb32 i'll destroy you guys at 3+0
  15. Seb32 except theino
  16. endrawes0 I meant like 45+45
  17. Seb32 darn
  18. endrawes0 I don't want to be destroyed
  19. Seb32 see petruchio - you were definitely winning
  20. Petruchio I felt things were cramped but good for me for awhile.
  21. Seb32 i blundered with Nb1 but i thought Na4 lost the knight
  22. endrawes0 You posted it really really fast
  23. endrawes0 Played*
  24. Seb32 yeah i thought it was the only move
  25. Seb32 i looked an Na4 before
  26. Seb32 i looked at it on move 17
  27. Petruchio Getting a rook and the queen for the queen seemed good, move 22 and 23.
  28. Seb32 yeah and i think you were still ahead after i got the bishop trapped
  29. Petruchio Yerah, amazing.
  30. Seb32 need more confidence! haha
  31. Petruchio Weird, move 25, I didn't even think of Ba1.
  32. Seb32 it still dies to ra2 but i was worried too
  33. Petruchio I could have perhaps kept ahead for awhile.
  34. endrawes0 Nice game gentlemen
  35. Petruchio Thanks.
  36. Seb32 it actually wins an extra pawn apparently with Ba1 Ra2 Re4 Kf1 Bxc3 Rxe5
  37. Seb32 thx endy
  38. Petruchio You really had me pressed and trapped on the king side withthe pawns and knight and rook. Nice interaction!
  39. Petruchio Looks like I could have been more aggresive with the g pawn.
  40. Seb32 yeah it was a very interesting game
  41. Petruchio It reall was.
  42. Petruchio I like the caro Kann, but it takes patience, and sometimes it just self-destructs.
  43. Seb32 i dont like the caro kann at all
  44. Seb32 feels so cramped to me
  45. Seb32 at least advanced variation
  46. Seb32 i play slav defense against d4 tho, so ...
  47. Petruchio It is cramped. But there are good chances with play around pawn to c5.
  48. Petruchio Thanks for the game seb. It was fun . We'll hjave to play again sometime.
  49. Seb32 alright - bye!
  50. Petruchio Later, dude.