lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
0.0
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d40.0Nf6+0.22c4+0.3g6+0.33f30.0d5+0.54cxd5+0.4Nxd5+0.65e4+0.8Nb6+0.36Nc3+0.4Bg7+0.67Be3+0.5O-O+0.58Qd2+1.0Nc6+1.09O-O-O+0.7f5+1.010e5+0.8e6??+3.0Blunder. Nb4 was best.10...Nb411.Nh3Be6[...]11Nh3?+1.5...Mistake. h4 was best.11.h411...Nb4?!+2.5Inaccuracy. Na5 was best.11...Na512.Bg5Qe8[...]12Nf4+2.5c6?!+3.6Inaccuracy. N6d5 was best.12...N6d513.Nfxd513h4+3.1N6d5+3.214Nfxd5+3.5cxd5+3.915a3+4.0Na6?!+6.1Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best.15...Nc616.h516h5+6.2Bd7+5.917hxg6+6.7hxg6+6.218Bh6+6.2Rf7+6.419Bxg7+5.3Rxg7+5.520Bb5?!+3.7...Inaccuracy. Bxa6 was best.20.Bxa620...Rc8?!+5.3Inaccuracy. Bxb5 was best.20...Bxb521Bxd7+4.4Qxd7+4.422Rh3+3.7Nc7+4.223Kb1+4.6a5+5.124Rdh1+4.3b5?+9.2Mistake. Kf7 was best.24...Kf725.Ne2b6[...]25Qg5+9.2Ne8+9.226Rh8++9.3Kf7+9.327R1h7+9.2Rxh7+10.528Rxh7++11.1Ng7+10.429Qf6++10.9Kg8+10.730Qxg6+10.1Rb8+31.031Nxb5?+5.7...Mistake. Qh6 was best.31.Qh6Qe732.Rh8+[...]31...Rxb5+5.132Rxg7+??+1.4...Blunder. Ka1 was best.32.Ka1Qe732...Qxg7+1.333Qe8++1.2Kh7+1.034Qxb5+0.9Kh6??+8.0Blunder. Qxg2 was best.34...Qxg235.Qd7+Kh8[...]35Qf1??+1.8...Blunder. Qe8 was best.35.Qe8Qg636.Qxg6+[...]35...f4??+5.9Blunder. Qa7 was best.35...Qa736.Qd136Qh1++5.8Kg5+5.937Qh3+5.8Qg6++5.838Kc1+5.5a4?+13.9Mistake. Qe8 was best.38...Qe839.Qg4+Kh6[...]39Qg4++14.9Kh6+11.640Qxf4++7.6
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/y92zSChD"] [Date "2022.09.29"] [White "thepaul1"] [Black "nvasquez"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "y92zSChD"] [UTCDate "2022.09.29"] [UTCTime "00:40:33"] [WhiteElo "1871"] [BlackElo "1900"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+17"] [BlackRatingDiff "-24"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "D70"] [Opening "Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Goglidze Attack"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. f3 d5 { D70 Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Goglidze Attack } 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. e4 Nb6 6. Nc3 Bg7 7. Be3 O-O 8. Qd2 Nc6 9. O-O-O f5 10. e5 e6?? { (0.83 → 3.01) Blunder. Nb4 was best. } (10... Nb4 11. Nh3 Be6 12. Kb1 Qd7 13. Nf4 Nc4 14. Bxc4 Bxc4 15. h4 a5 16. a3 b5 17. h5) 11. Nh3? { (3.01 → 1.52) Mistake. h4 was best. } (11. h4) 11... Nb4?! { (1.52 → 2.54) Inaccuracy. Na5 was best. } (11... Na5 12. Bg5 Qe8 13. Bh6 Nac4 14. Qg5 Qd8 15. Kb1 Bd7 16. Qc1 Bxh6 17. Qxh6 Qe7 18. b3) 12. Nf4 c6?! { (2.54 → 3.56) Inaccuracy. N6d5 was best. } (12... N6d5 13. Nfxd5) 13. h4 N6d5 14. Nfxd5 cxd5 15. a3 Na6?! { (3.98 → 6.05) Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best. } (15... Nc6 16. h5) 16. h5 Bd7 17. hxg6 hxg6 18. Bh6 Rf7 19. Bxg7 Rxg7 20. Bb5?! { (5.50 → 3.74) Inaccuracy. Bxa6 was best. } (20. Bxa6) 20... Rc8?! { (3.74 → 5.31) Inaccuracy. Bxb5 was best. } (20... Bxb5) 21. Bxd7 Qxd7 22. Rh3 Nc7 23. Kb1 a5 24. Rdh1 b5? { (4.28 → 9.16) Mistake. Kf7 was best. } (24... Kf7 25. Ne2 b6 26. Rh7 Rg8 27. Rxg7+ Rxg7 28. Qg5 Qe7 29. Qc1 Kg8 30. Qc6 Qe8 31. Qxb6) 25. Qg5 Ne8 26. Rh8+ Kf7 27. R1h7 Rxh7 28. Rxh7+ Ng7 29. Qf6+ Kg8 30. Qxg6 Rb8 31. Nxb5? { (31.02 → 5.72) Mistake. Qh6 was best. } (31. Qh6 Qe7 32. Rh8+ Kf7 33. Rxb8 Ne8 34. Qh7+ Ng7 35. Nxb5 a4 36. Rg8) 31... Rxb5 32. Rxg7+?? { (5.14 → 1.39) Blunder. Ka1 was best. } (32. Ka1 Qe7) 32... Qxg7 33. Qe8+ Kh7 34. Qxb5 Kh6?? { (0.91 → 8.04) Blunder. Qxg2 was best. } (34... Qxg2 35. Qd7+ Kh8 36. Qe8+ Kg7 37. Qe7+ Kh8 38. Ka2 Qf1 39. Qd8+ Kh7 40. Qd7+ Kh8 41. Qc6) 35. Qf1?? { (8.04 → 1.81) Blunder. Qe8 was best. } (35. Qe8 Qg6 36. Qxg6+ Kxg6 37. b4 axb4 38. axb4 Kf7 39. Kc2 Ke7 40. Kb3 Kd7 41. b5 Kc7) 35... f4?? { (1.81 → 5.92) Blunder. Qa7 was best. } (35... Qa7 36. Qd1) 36. Qh1+ Kg5 37. Qh3 Qg6+ 38. Kc1 a4? { (5.52 → 13.86) Mistake. Qe8 was best. } (38... Qe8 39. Qg4+ Kh6 40. Qxf4+ Kg6 41. Kd2 Qb5 42. Qf6+ Kh7 43. Qf7+ Kh8 44. Qf8+ Kh7 45. Qc5) 39. Qg4+ Kh6 40. Qxf4+ { Black resigns. } 1-0
1 Inaccuracy
2 Mistakes
2 Blunders
65 Average centipawn loss
85%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
4 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
3 Blunders
84 Average centipawn loss
79%Accuracy
  1. nvasquez looking at 10... f4 vs Qd7 vs Qd6... line is Qd6 but I don't understand it
  2. nvasquez f4 also a good options which I do understand... undermine the center
  3. nvasquez (13 N6d5) Don't think anyone would accuse me of cheating here but I like this position.
  4. nvasquez feels like a critical moment
  5. nvasquez my c8 bishop is really bad here but I have a chance to open things up
  6. nvasquez (14 Nxd5) So Nxd5 or cxd?
  7. nvasquez by instinct alone I think cxd is better due to the open file on the king. Not sure if concretely its better but I'll see
  8. nvasquez man - instincts be damned... I think Nxd5 was better now. Ugh
  9. bufferunderrun Ne8 seems forced now (25)
  10. nvasquez (25 Qg5) I think he might have something here... but I think the knight can defend
  11. nvasquez (28 Ng7) In opposite side castling whomever attacks first usually wins - he got there first...
  12. nvasquez think I'll go back to cxd5 and look at Nxd5 to see if that was better
  13. bufferunderrun yeah, this is bad... Qf6+ Kg8 Rxg7 Qxg7 Qxe6+
  14. bufferunderrun but now one might perhaps have b4
  15. bufferunderrun or 30...Rc4 might also be an option
  16. bufferunderrun this seem to fail to 31.Qh6
  17. bufferunderrun or maybe not...
  18. bufferunderrun nah, Qh6 seems good here
  19. bufferunderrun i.e. Qh6 Rb7 Rh8+ Kf7 Qf6+
  20. bufferunderrun 38...Qf7 ig, everything else is kind of bad, e.g. Qg4+ and Qxf4
  21. bufferunderrun pawn endgame is totally lost, so Qg4 and Qx is the easiest
  22. bufferunderrun gg
  23. fake_switch ggs
  24. nvasquez man... that sucked