lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.3
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.3c6+0.42d4+0.3d5+0.43e5+0.5Bf5+0.54Nc30.0e60.05g40.0Bg6+0.16Nge2−0.9h6?+0.3Mistake. c5 was best.6...c57.Be3h5[...]7Be3+0.2Nd7+0.68Qd2+0.1c5?+1.8Mistake. h5 was best.8...h59.Nf4Ne7[...]9f4+1.7h5?+3.4Mistake. Qa5 was best.9...Qa510.a310f5+3.0exf5+3.611Nf4+3.2Nxe5??+9.4Blunder. Ne7 was best.11...Ne712.dxc512dxe5+9.2d4+12.713Bb5++12.2Ke7+16.214Ncd5+#8Qxd5#815Nxd5+#7
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/y0EiDXCu"] [Date "2022.01.27"] [White "texaspete09"] [Black "pie314271"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "y0EiDXCu"] [UTCDate "2022.01.27"] [UTCTime "22:32:39"] [WhiteElo "2056"] [BlackElo "2074"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+14"] [BlackRatingDiff "-28"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "B12"] [Opening "Caro-Kann Defense: Advance Variation, Van der Wiel Attack"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. e5 Bf5 4. Nc3 { B12 Caro-Kann Defense: Advance Variation, Van der Wiel Attack } e6 5. g4 Bg6 6. Nge2 h6? { (-0.87 → 0.29) Mistake. c5 was best. } (6... c5 7. Be3 h5 8. Nf4 Bh7 9. dxc5 Nc6 10. Bg2 hxg4 11. Qxg4) 7. Be3 Nd7 8. Qd2 c5? { (0.10 → 1.79) Mistake. h5 was best. } (8... h5 9. Nf4 Ne7 10. gxh5 Bxh5 11. Nxh5 Rxh5 12. Bg5 Qa5 13. h4 a6 14. O-O-O c5 15. dxc5) 9. f4 h5? { (1.68 → 3.38) Mistake. Qa5 was best. } (9... Qa5 10. a3) 10. f5 exf5 11. Nf4 Nxe5?? { (3.22 → 9.38) Blunder. Ne7 was best. } (11... Ne7 12. dxc5) 12. dxe5 d4 13. Bb5+ Ke7 14. Ncd5+ Qxd5 15. Nxd5+ { Black resigns. } 1-0
0 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
21 Average centipawn loss
89%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
0 Inaccuracies
3 Mistakes
1 Blunder
92 Average centipawn loss
68%Accuracy
  1. izcms02 good luck pie!
  2. izcms02 (4) "caro-kann you not?"
  3. izcms02 (5) oooh it's a sharp one
  4. pie314271 (6) i had prep for b3 and caro tal variation, so its already in smth else
  5. pie314271 (6) well, its a caro, so i have some ideas
  6. izcms02 (7) the van der wiel attack...
  7. izcms02 (7) the more you know...
  8. izcms02 (7) it's more popular than the tal line
  9. kajoM good evening
  10. izcms02 (7) hey kajo
  11. kajoM i don't know much about c-k, but I'd cinsider C5 even now.
  12. izcms02 (8) c5 tends not to do so well
  13. izcms02 (8) I would rather go Bb4
  14. izcms02 (8) although... among lichess players... that isn't that successful either
  15. kajoM isn't one of the main variations of advanced caro 3...C5? i think I've seen top players do that
  16. kajoM but bb4 looks fine as well
  17. izcms02 (8) yeah this is not a main line though...
  18. izcms02 (8) I think the problem black needs to solve is the king safety issue
  19. izcms02 (8) b5 is interesting
  20. izcms02 (8) black has done well with it
  21. kajoM you probably castle long, right?
  22. izcms02 (8) i dunno..., you can...
  23. izcms02 (8) looks like black is just worse though
  24. izcms02 (8) no play, weaker king
  25. kajoM like bb4 Qa5 and long castle and then try to undermine White centrę.
  26. izcms02 (8) ah right
  27. izcms02 (8) waiting with c5
  28. izcms02 (8) knight can land on e7
  29. izcms02 (8) i gotta bounce; i'll be back in a bit: good lick pie!
  30. kajoM i'm gonna go to sleep zoo.
  31. kajoM soon
  32. kajoM i'll be damned, I predicted a move.
  33. pie314271 (8) c4 isnt good in most lines, but white didnt develop the lsb, so im thinking..
  34. kajoM Is Qh4 check a move here?
  35. rsandzimier does queen get trapped after 10. bf2 Qxg4 11. Rg1?
  36. rsandzimier Not quite trapped I don't think
  37. rsandzimier after 9. ... Qh4+ I mean
  38. kajoM That's what i'm calculating.
  39. kajoM 11...Qf5
  40. pie314271 (9) i spent 10 mins on a6, only to then see the Ng3, f5 plan
  41. itisfeathers I think the h5 plan is looking like a problem here
  42. itisfeathers is this a queen
  43. freddy267t nasty
  44. freddy267t Q or mate
  45. itisfeathers but good king activity
  46. itisfeathers unlucky pie