lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.3
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.3d6+0.72d4+0.4Nf6+0.63Nc3+0.6g6+0.84Be3+0.5a6+0.95Nf3+0.7Bg7+0.56Qd2+0.5b5+1.07a3?!+0.3...Inaccuracy. Bh6 was best.7.Bh6O-O8.Bxg7[...]7...Nbd7+0.38Bh6+0.3O-O??+2.4Blunder. Bxh6 was best.8...Bxh69.Qxh69h4?+0.8...Mistake. e5 was best.9.e5Ne89...Bb7?+1.9Mistake. Bxh6 was best.9...Bxh610.Qxh610Bxg7+1.8Kxg7+1.511Bd3?!+0.4...Inaccuracy. h5 was best.11.h511...h5+0.112Ng5+0.5c5+0.613d5+0.8Ne5+0.914O-O+0.8Qc7?!+1.4Inaccuracy. Qb6 was best.14...Qb615.Kh1Bc8[...]15Rae1+1.0c4+1.516f4??−1.6...Blunder. Be2 was best.16.Be2Qc517.Kh1[...]16...Qc5+−1.517Kh1−1.8Nxd3??+1.4Blunder. Neg4 was best.17...Neg418cxd3+1.3cxd3+1.419Qxd3+1.4Rae8?!+2.5Inaccuracy. Ng4 was best.19...Ng420.Nd1Bc8[...]20f5+2.4Ng4+2.221Qd2+1.6Bc8+1.822fxg6?!+1.1...Inaccuracy. Nd1 was best.22.Nd1f623.Nh3[...]22...fxg6+0.823Ne6+??−7.6...Blunder. Ne2 was best.23.Ne2Rf223...Bxe6−7.424dxe6−8.2Qe5−8.125Nd5?#−1...Checkmate is now unavoidable. g3 was best.25.g3Qxg325...Qh2#
0-1
Checkmate • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/uZcWguUm"] [Date "2022.01.29"] [White "twobits"] [Black "jojoschessadventure"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "uZcWguUm"] [UTCDate "2022.01.29"] [UTCTime "12:02:18"] [WhiteElo "1784"] [BlackElo "1735"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-30"] [BlackRatingDiff "+28"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "B07"] [Opening "Pirc Defense"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 d6 2. d4 Nf6 3. Nc3 g6 { B07 Pirc Defense } 4. Be3 a6 5. Nf3 Bg7 6. Qd2 b5 7. a3?! { (0.95 → 0.28) Inaccuracy. Bh6 was best. } (7. Bh6 O-O 8. Bxg7 Kxg7 9. Bd3 Nc6 10. e5 dxe5 11. dxe5 Ng4) 7... Nbd7 8. Bh6 O-O?? { (0.31 → 2.41) Blunder. Bxh6 was best. } (8... Bxh6 9. Qxh6) 9. h4? { (2.41 → 0.75) Mistake. e5 was best. } (9. e5 Ne8) 9... Bb7? { (0.75 → 1.91) Mistake. Bxh6 was best. } (9... Bxh6 10. Qxh6) 10. Bxg7 Kxg7 11. Bd3?! { (1.51 → 0.42) Inaccuracy. h5 was best. } (11. h5) 11... h5 12. Ng5 c5 13. d5 Ne5 14. O-O Qc7?! { (0.84 → 1.43) Inaccuracy. Qb6 was best. } (14... Qb6 15. Kh1 Bc8 16. Be2 b4 17. Na4 Qc7 18. b3 a5 19. Nb2 e6 20. axb4 cxb4 21. dxe6) 15. Rae1 c4 16. f4?? { (1.46 → -1.61) Blunder. Be2 was best. } (16. Be2 Qc5 17. Kh1 a5 18. f4 Neg4 19. e5 Nxd5 20. Bxg4 hxg4 21. Nge4 Qc6 22. exd6 Rh8) 16... Qc5+ 17. Kh1 Nxd3?? { (-1.82 → 1.41) Blunder. Neg4 was best. } (17... Neg4) 18. cxd3 cxd3 19. Qxd3 Rae8?! { (1.41 → 2.50) Inaccuracy. Ng4 was best. } (19... Ng4 20. Nd1 Bc8 21. f5 b4 22. Qg3 bxa3 23. bxa3 Rb8 24. Nf2 Nxf2+ 25. Rxf2 Rb3 26. Rf3) 20. f5 Ng4 21. Qd2 Bc8 22. fxg6?! { (1.79 → 1.05) Inaccuracy. Nd1 was best. } (22. Nd1 f6 23. Nh3 gxf5 24. exf5 Rg8 25. Ne3 Kf7 26. b4 Qc7 27. Nxg4 hxg4 28. Nf4 Bxf5) 22... fxg6 23. Ne6+?? { (0.83 → -7.59) Blunder. Ne2 was best. } (23. Ne2 Rf2) 23... Bxe6 24. dxe6 Qe5 25. Nd5? { (-8.12 → Mate in 1) Checkmate is now unavoidable. g3 was best. } (25. g3 Qxg3) 25... Qh2# { Black wins by checkmate. } 0-1
3 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
2 Blunders
83 Average centipawn loss
68%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
2 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
2 Blunders
47 Average centipawn loss
81%Accuracy
  1. twobits (1...d6) already surprised me, heh
  2. CM FearlessKing64 Let's go JoJo!
  3. Latinovicz Lets go!
  4. Latinovicz Ng4 seems like the most logical continuation, disallowing the trade
  5. Latinovicz Then again it would lead to a weakening of the kingside structure after like Bf4 e5 Bg5 f6 etc, this makes sense too
  6. Latinovicz Black is probably happy to see a3
  7. CM FearlessKing64 I expected 7. Bd3 solid as a rock. Now probably Bb7-Nbd7,
  8. CM FearlessKing64 Scary for Black. I expected Bxh6 followed by Ng4-h5 to temporarily stop White's attack.
  9. twobits (12.Ng5) who was it that said "castle if you want to or if you must, but never because you can"? i wonder if i must here...
  10. Latinovicz Dont see anything immediate but black needs to be extremely careful with tactics on e6, g6
  11. twobits (13.d5) going e5 instead of d5 looked pretty crazy but i couldn't seem to make it work, gonna have to look into it deeper later
  12. twobits (13...Ne5) ugh i keep forgetting this is not 90+30
  13. twobits (14.O-O) ok this time i wanted to, heh
  14. Latinovicz Black gained a lot in the last couple of moves... The lsb if he wants to, e5 square, queenside counterplay, solidified kingside
  15. jojoschessadventure My opponent is an early contender for the alexander grischuk award. It is 8am EST and I am somewhat hungover.
  16. jojoschessadventure Still, I think the position is equal and I have the easier play against my opponents extended pawns
  17. Latinovicz Lol
  18. CM FearlessKing64 16. f4 Now Black has Ng4-Qb6.
  19. twobits (17.Kh1) what a mess!
  20. RedzoneNova (20) Nf2+ on the table
  21. CM FearlessKing64 Yes, counter attack to fxg6-Ne6+
  22. CM FearlessKing64 21... Bc8 now? Bishop is blocked anyway.
  23. Latinovicz Tough position to play with a minute on the clock
  24. RedzoneNova very true
  25. RedzoneNova maybe white can try some Ne2-f4 maneuver?
  26. twobits (22.fxg6) gah i need like 2 more hours
  27. RedzoneNova i would want to play Ne2 here but then Nf2 looks annoying
  28. CM FearlessKing64 (24) Suddenly Qe5 is available.
  29. CM FearlessKing64 Finding a threat: 2 moves with the same color and mate. Works surprisingly often.
  30. Latinovicz eah seems crushing, if he takes his time hell find it
  31. Latinovicz Yeah*
  32. RedzoneNova ouch gg
  33. CM FearlessKing64 Good game!
  34. Latinovicz Gg!
  35. CM FearlessKing64 Congrats JoJo!
  36. twobits lol ending
  37. twobits damn time trouble, i can't think properly
  38. jojoschessadventure thanks 808 teammates for the support
  39. RedzoneNova ahaha of course stockfish says just play 23. Ne2 and then let your king walk to g3 if you get checked
  40. CM FearlessKing64 I had a discussion with a student last night. He blamed his loss on a blunder in time trouble.
  41. CM FearlessKing64 I asked him whether time trouble was an external force or whether he could control it.
  42. CM FearlessKing64 It is a serious question.
  43. CM FearlessKing64 Because time trouble addicts describe it as if it is an addiction.
  44. twobits well yeah, obviously it's my own fault getting into time trouble
  45. CM FearlessKing64 As if it is happening to them.
  46. twobits i'm used to longer games though, taking the time to calculate
  47. CM FearlessKing64 A habit that is very hard to change though,
  48. twobits FK, what do you mean by "two moves of the same color"?
  49. RedzoneNova I assume he meant that if black got two moves in a row, they could play checkmate
  50. CM FearlessKing64 After 24. dxe6 you make 2 moves with Black: Qe5-Qh2#
  51. CM FearlessKing64 Without a White move in between.
  52. twobits ahhh, i see
  53. RedzoneNova so if you can find two moves like that, you often have a pretty potent threat
  54. twobits i thought it was about the square colors somehow
  55. CM FearlessKing64 It is to be over safe squares: so not Qf2-Qh4
  56. CM FearlessKing64 There are three targets in chess: king, material and squares.
  57. CM FearlessKing64 You can find target squares often by this method: 2 moves with the same color.
  58. twobits interesting
  59. CM FearlessKing64 So h2 is a target in this case.
  60. jojoschessadventure Indeed, that is what I did to find the movw
  61. jojoschessadventure I actually started by looking for targets in the position first
  62. jojoschessadventure I saw e6 was undefended, considered Qe5 as a candidate then saw that h2 was vulnerable as well
  63. CM FearlessKing64 @Jojo how did you evaluate 12... c5 versus 12... e5?
  64. jojoschessadventure I thought they were both playable
  65. CM FearlessKing64 Yes, only difference I saw is that after e5 d5 you can follow up with c6 and after c5 d5 there is no e6
  66. jojoschessadventure I think I preferred c5 because the 4.Be3 lines I have studied usually go c5 rather than e5, so I had more familiarity
  67. jojoschessadventure thats true. During the game I felt e6 was very difficult to get in
  68. jojoschessadventure Especially following h4-h5, Ng5
  69. CM FearlessKing64 Yes, I am also more familiar with c5 (playing from the White side).
  70. CM FearlessKing64 Gotta go. Ggs.