lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.3
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d4+0.3d5+0.22c4+0.3c6+0.33Nf3+0.2Nf6+0.24Nc3+0.1Bg4?!+0.9Inaccuracy. dxc4 was best.4...dxc45.a4Bf5[...]5cxd5?!+0.3...Inaccuracy. Ne5 was best.5.Ne5Bc86.Bf4[...]5...cxd5+0.86Qb3+0.8Qd7??+3.0Blunder. Qb6 was best.6...Qb67.Qxb6axb6[...]7Bf4??+0.8...Blunder. Ne5 was best.7.Ne5Qc78.Nxg4[...]7...Nc6+1.28Nb5?!+0.5...Inaccuracy. Ne5 was best.8.Ne5Nxe59.Bxe5[...]8...Rd8??+10.4Blunder. Rc8 was best.8...Rc89.Ne5Nxe5[...]9Nc7++10.5Qxc7+10.210Bxc7+10.0
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/tV71O6yd"] [Date "2016.10.20"] [White "fradtheimpaler"] [Black "Immortality"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "tV71O6yd"] [UTCDate "2016.10.20"] [UTCTime "21:58:08"] [WhiteElo "1652"] [BlackElo "1665"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+12"] [BlackRatingDiff "-11"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "D15"] [Opening "Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 { D15 Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation } Bg4?! { (0.13 → 0.87) Inaccuracy. dxc4 was best. } (4... dxc4 5. a4 Bf5 6. e3 e6 7. Bxc4 Bb4 8. O-O O-O 9. Qb3 a5 10. Na2 c5 11. Nxb4) 5. cxd5?! { (0.87 → 0.26) Inaccuracy. Ne5 was best. } (5. Ne5 Bc8 6. Bf4 Nbd7 7. Nxd7 Bxd7 8. e3 h6 9. Bd3 dxc4 10. Bxc4 e6 11. O-O Bb4) 5... cxd5 6. Qb3 Qd7?? { (0.75 → 3.04) Blunder. Qb6 was best. } (6... Qb6 7. Qxb6 axb6 8. Ne5 Bd7 9. Nxd7 Kxd7 10. e3 e6 11. Bd2 Nc6 12. f3 Bd6 13. Kf2) 7. Bf4?? { (3.04 → 0.79) Blunder. Ne5 was best. } (7. Ne5 Qc7 8. Nxg4 Nxg4 9. Nxd5 Qd7 10. Bf4 e5 11. dxe5 Nc6 12. Rd1 Rd8 13. e6 Bb4+) 7... Nc6 8. Nb5?! { (1.20 → 0.53) Inaccuracy. Ne5 was best. } (8. Ne5 Nxe5 9. Bxe5 Ne4 10. Nb5 Nd6 11. e3 a6 12. Bxd6 exd6 13. Bd3 Be6 14. Nc3 Be7) 8... Rd8?? { (0.53 → 10.41) Blunder. Rc8 was best. } (8... Rc8 9. Ne5 Nxe5 10. dxe5 Ne4 11. f3 Nc5 12. Qb4 Bf5 13. Rc1 b6 14. Nd4 e6 15. Qb5) 9. Nc7+ Qxc7 10. Bxc7 { Black resigns. } 1-0
2 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
37 Average centipawn loss
75%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
2 Blunders
149 Average centipawn loss
48%Accuracy
  1. Immortality well at least it was quick
  2. fradtheimpaler computer line is strange
  3. Immortality not much to talk about... well played
  4. GnarlyGoat Well that happened. Well done Frad... I think