lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.1
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d4+0.1f5+0.32c4+0.4Nf6+0.53Nf3+0.3g6+0.24Nc3+0.3Bg7+0.45Bf4+0.5O-O+0.66e3+0.2d6+0.57Be2+0.2Re8+0.68O-O+0.6Nh5+0.79Bg5+0.6h6+0.810Bh4+0.6Nf6+1.011Qb3+0.7g5+0.812Bg3+0.6Nh5+0.813c5++0.7e6+1.014cxd6+0.6Nxg3+1.115hxg3+0.9cxd6+1.016Rac1+0.6Kh7?+1.7Mistake. Nc6 was best.16...Nc617.Rfd1d5[...]17Rfd1?!+1.1...Inaccuracy. g4 was best.17.g4Nc617...g4+1.218Ne1+1.1d5+1.219Nd3+1.0Nc6+1.320Nb5?!+0.7...Inaccuracy. Qc2 was best.20.Qc2Kg821.Na4[...]20...a6+1.121Qa3?!0.0...Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best.21.Nc3Rb822.Qc2[...]21...Bf8+0.222Qa40.0Bd7+0.223Nc3−0.1Nb4+0.324Qb30.0a5?!+1.0Inaccuracy. Nxd3 was best.24...Nxd325.Bxd3Bc6[...]25Nxb4??−0.8...Blunder. Nc5 was best.25.Nc5Bxc526.dxc5[...]25...axb4−0.526Nb5−0.9Ra5?!0.0Inaccuracy. Bc6 was best.26...Bc627.a3bxa3[...]27Nc70.0Ba40.028Qd30.0Bxd10.029Bxd10.0Kg80.030Nxe80.0Qxe8+0.131Rc7?!−0.8...Inaccuracy. Bb3 was best.31.Bb3Bd632.Qd2[...]31...b5?+0.3Mistake. Bd6 was best.31...Bd632.Rc1Rxa2[...]32Bxg4??−2.6...Blunder. Bb3 was best.32.Bb3Bd633.Rc2[...]32...Bd6−2.033Qc2?−4.0...Mistake. Bh5 was best.33.Bh5Qxh534.Rc6[...]33...Bxc7−3.534Qxc7−3.7Rxa2−3.535Bf3−4.4Rxb2−3.936g4?!−5.0...Inaccuracy. Qc1 was best.36.Qc1Ra236...Rb1+??−1.6Blunder. b3 was best.36...b337Kh2−2.3Qf7−2.138gxf5??#−9...Checkmate is now unavoidable. Qb8+ was best.38.Qb8+Qf838...Qxc7+#−8
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/sephM6Ya"] [Date "2018.08.03"] [White "shetoo"] [Black "DracoxVitae"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "sephM6Ya"] [UTCDate "2018.08.03"] [UTCTime "21:00:21"] [WhiteElo "1801"] [BlackElo "1782"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-11"] [BlackRatingDiff "+12"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "A84"] [Opening "Dutch Defense: Normal Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 f5 2. c4 Nf6 { A84 Dutch Defense: Normal Variation } 3. Nf3 g6 4. Nc3 Bg7 5. Bf4 O-O 6. e3 d6 7. Be2 Re8 8. O-O Nh5 9. Bg5 h6 10. Bh4 Nf6 11. Qb3 g5 12. Bg3 Nh5 13. c5+ e6 14. cxd6 Nxg3 15. hxg3 cxd6 16. Rac1 Kh7? { (0.58 → 1.72) Mistake. Nc6 was best. } (16... Nc6 17. Rfd1 d5 18. Na4 Bd7 19. Nc5 Rb8 20. Qa3 Re7 21. Nxd7 Rxd7 22. Ne1 Qe7 23. Qxe7) 17. Rfd1?! { (1.72 → 1.05) Inaccuracy. g4 was best. } (17. g4 Nc6) 17... g4 18. Ne1 d5 19. Nd3 Nc6 20. Nb5?! { (1.30 → 0.66) Inaccuracy. Qc2 was best. } (20. Qc2 Kg8 21. Na4 Na5 22. Nf4 b6 23. Nc3 a6 24. f3 gxf3 25. Bxf3 Bd7 26. g4 Nc4) 20... a6 21. Qa3?! { (1.06 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best. } (21. Nc3 Rb8 22. Qc2 Bd7 23. Nc5 Kg8 24. a3 Re7 25. Bd3 Be8 26. Ne2 Rc8 27. Nf4 Bf7) 21... Bf8 22. Qa4 Bd7 23. Nc3 Nb4 24. Qb3 a5?! { (0.00 → 1.02) Inaccuracy. Nxd3 was best. } (24... Nxd3 25. Bxd3 Bc6 26. Ne2 Qd7 27. Qb6 Bd6 28. Nf4 Rac8 29. Kh2 Qf7 30. Rh1 Kg7 31. a3) 25. Nxb4?? { (1.02 → -0.78) Blunder. Nc5 was best. } (25. Nc5 Bxc5 26. dxc5 Rb8 27. a3 Nc6 28. Na4 Qf6 29. Nb6 Rbd8 30. Rb1 h5 31. Qa4 h4) 25... axb4 26. Nb5 Ra5?! { (-0.86 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. Bc6 was best. } (26... Bc6 27. a3 bxa3 28. bxa3 h5 29. a4 Kg8 30. Nc3 h4 31. Bb5 hxg3 32. fxg3 Qa5 33. Bxc6) 27. Nc7 Ba4 28. Qd3 Bxd1 29. Bxd1 Kg8 30. Nxe8 Qxe8 31. Rc7?! { (0.09 → -0.84) Inaccuracy. Bb3 was best. } (31. Bb3 Bd6 32. Qd2 Kg7 33. a4 Ra6 34. Qd1 h5 35. Kf1 Rc6 36. Rxc6 Qxc6 37. Ke2 Kg6) 31... b5? { (-0.84 → 0.33) Mistake. Bd6 was best. } (31... Bd6 32. Rc1 Rxa2 33. Qd2 Kg7 34. Bb3 Ra6 35. Kf1 Qb5+ 36. Qe2 Qd7 37. Qd1 Be7 38. Qd3) 32. Bxg4?? { (0.33 → -2.62) Blunder. Bb3 was best. } (32. Bb3 Bd6 33. Rc2 Qd7 34. Qd2 Kg7 35. Qc1 Ra7 36. Rc8 Rc7 37. Rxc7 Qxc7 38. Qxc7+ Bxc7) 32... Bd6 33. Qc2? { (-1.97 → -4.05) Mistake. Bh5 was best. } (33. Bh5 Qxh5 34. Rc6 Bf8 35. Rxe6 Rxa2 36. Qb1 b3 37. Rb6 b4 38. Rf6 Ra7 39. Qc1 Kg7) 33... Bxc7 34. Qxc7 Rxa2 35. Bf3 Rxb2 36. g4?! { (-3.92 → -5.01) Inaccuracy. Qc1 was best. } (36. Qc1 Ra2) 36... Rb1+?? { (-5.01 → -1.63) Blunder. b3 was best. } (36... b3) 37. Kh2 Qf7 38. gxf5?? { (-2.07 → Mate in 9) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Qb8+ was best. } (38. Qb8+ Qf8) 38... Qxc7+ { White resigns. } 0-1
01
shetooDracoxVitae
01
shetoo −11
5 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
3 Blunders
66 Average centipawn loss
77%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
DracoxVitae +12
2 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
1 Blunder
39 Average centipawn loss
87%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Dutch Defense: Normal Variation
  1. swagquark no there per se
  2. shetoo or u mean start from the bottom of chain and look up
  3. swagquark no, f3 is the right way to start off
  4. swagquark but not necessarily on move 20
  5. shetoo i thought about it
  6. shetoo but thought it really damages my pawn chain heavily
  7. swagquark how so?
  8. swagquark or, what were you afraid of
  9. shetoo now e pawn becomes backward
  10. shetoo and he has a rook looking at e pawn
  11. swagquark through his own weak backward e pawn though
  12. shetoo yeah ur right
  13. shetoo i guess i was too scare
  14. shetoo and i didnt calculate how bad it could be for him if he ever pushes e5
  15. swagquark gotta watch more Simon Williams
  16. swagquark but maybe chill on the h pawn abuse for longer time controls
  17. shetoo lmao
  18. shetoo okay
  19. swagquark btw which country are you in? im about to need to hunt for chess coaches around Holland
  20. shetoo egypt
  21. swagquark a bit far haha
  22. swagquark isnt there a team name, girls from egypt or something?
  23. shetoo those guys
  24. shetoo we beat them last round
  25. swagquark ::glares at Erin::
  26. ErinYu I was an alternate!!
  27. swagquark makes sense
  28. swagquark South Korea is not in Egypt
  29. swagquark I think
  30. swagquark Im American, so who knows
  31. swagquark oh
  32. ErinYu Few thousand miles away, but close enough :P
  33. swagquark im also a quantum physicist
  34. swagquark which I saw you rambled about in chat
  35. ErinYu Oh! That's neat. I have zero knowledge about quantum physics and probably never will.
  36. swagquark well dont worry about planck time
  37. swagquark its silly
  38. shetoo what do u study to become Quantum physicist
  39. shetoo in college?
  40. swagquark bachelors in physics
  41. swagquark then master in physics
  42. swagquark finally
  43. swagquark doctorate in physics
  44. ErinYu For a brief while I was really interested in quantum chemistry, but never really got into it.
  45. ErinYu Didn't know enough math back then... actually, I still don't.
  46. swagquark thats fine
  47. swagquark most physicists know too much math
  48. swagquark and they start relying way too much on it
  49. swagquark (@shetoo) basically quantum physics is just modern physics. (studying anything before that just makes you an engineer)
  50. shetoo i think ur the first quantum physicist i ever meet
  51. ErinYu ^^
  52. swagquark I suppose they are pretty rare in Egypt.
  53. shetoo yeah
  54. swagquark i dont think i ever met one before i started studying it formally either
  55. shetoo why did u go for it?
  56. swagquark i didnt really fall in love with any subject
  57. swagquark and amonst the subjects i did take, it seemed to be the subject other people didnt quite get
  58. swagquark and i enjoyed the puzzles
  59. shetoo i see
  60. ErinYu Chemical or mechanical engineering? Which one is better?
  61. shetoo haha
  62. swagquark for...?
  63. ErinYu If you had to drop physics and go into one of those two fields.
  64. swagquark chemical can probably pay better
  65. swagquark so that one
  66. ErinYu Shetoo, that's two losses in one day...
  67. shetoo wrong answer
  68. shetoo ..
  69. ErinYu (Thanks :P)
  70. shetoo did u guys study heat transfer?
  71. swagquark yup
  72. swagquark and whats the back story, are you 2 chemical and mechanical engineers?
  73. shetoo yeah
  74. ErinYu Undergrads, at least...
  75. shetoo to be
  76. swagquark fair enough
  77. ErinYu Well now your name swagquark makes a lot more sense lol
  78. swagquark i assume you are referring to the swag
  79. ErinYu Pretty much :P
  80. swagquark which korean university do you attend?
  81. swagquark i've met a lot of south korean students on exchange in california
  82. ErinYu I'm actually in the US
  83. swagquark they always wanted to try marijuana
  84. swagquark oh really?
  85. swagquark well which school then?
  86. ErinYu Virginia Tech. Next year... who knows :P
  87. swagquark as in for grad school?
  88. swagquark or just graduation
  89. ErinYu That's the plan, at least. Probably in ChemE but also debating just chemistry.
  90. swagquark fun
  91. swagquark i just wrapped up at UC Santa Barbara on the west coast
  92. ErinYu Looking for kinetics/thermo research and the fields overlap ever so slightly, so I should be deciding soon.
  93. swagquark what about materials science?
  94. ErinYu Recently meaning in the last few years?
  95. swagquark as in submitted my PhD paperwork last week
  96. ErinYu I took a statics course on accident. Wasn't very fun... but it was interesting. Kinetics is definitely much more my style.
  97. ErinYu Congrats!!!
  98. swagquark ::bows:: thank you
  99. shetoo guys, thanks for joining my company, i really appreciated ur help, i gtg, have a good night
  100. swagquark sure thing. nighty night
  101. swagquark so, what exactly does kinetics refer to in engineering?
  102. swagquark friction?
  103. ErinYu I'm not even sure... in my case it's more like reaction chemistry
  104. ErinYu Rate laws, reactors, and all that
  105. swagquark plasma etching?
  106. ErinYu Maybe other disciplines use the word differently
  107. swagquark I guess from a physics POV, "kinetics" just means "stuff is moving yo"
  108. ErinYu :P Had to google what plasma etching was...
  109. swagquark no worries. I just googled chemistry and kinetrics.
  110. ErinYu If I understand correctly... basically an alternate method to etch circuit boards at a lower temperature?
  111. swagquark its a dry way to do it vs a wet way
  112. swagquark if thats what you mean
  113. ErinYu Wasn't at all what I meant, but now I know lol
  114. ErinYu Basically how fast a reaction happens. Proposing reaction mechanisms. In engineering, reactor design and all that.
  115. ErinYu I'm still studying so my explanation might be somewhat off
  116. swagquark so changing the boundary conditions to effect the differential equation?
  117. swagquark (assuming reactor is a physical container, as opposed to a reacting species)
  118. ErinYu I guess so? If by that you mean optimizing conditions for a given rate law.
  119. swagquark yeah basically
  120. ErinYu Haven't done much engineering work in kinetics yet, but for chemistry it's stuff like monitoring reactions and determining their mechanisms.
  121. ErinYu You probably did that stuff like 10 years ago in Gen Chem
  122. swagquark sorta
  123. swagquark played around with [A][B]^b kinda stuff
  124. ErinYu Exactly, that kind of stuff.
  125. swagquark never implemented solving of DiffEQs though, which i assume is what you do in the advanced courses
  126. swagquark so does VT have a good chess club?
  127. ErinYu Depends on which school you go to I guess...
  128. ErinYu You definitely go more into theory for chemistry and ChemE just tries to apply the basics to continuous reactors.
  129. ErinYu Been there a few times. It's a nice place :P but the players aren't extremely strong.
  130. ErinYu Doesn't CA have a lot of GMs?
  131. swagquark maybe
  132. swagquark but not at either UCSB or harvey mudd (my undergrad)
  133. swagquark i was actually probably the strongest player until we got an NM here
  134. swagquark this year
  135. ErinYu Are you rated OTB by chance?
  136. swagquark nope
  137. swagquark planning on fixing that
  138. swagquark but from here I need to drive over an hour to get to the nearest rated games
  139. swagquark so its wherever i end up next
  140. swagquark I may go for a FIDE rating while im in Europe starting in a couple of weeks
  141. swagquark you?
  142. ErinYu Just curious, why are you in Holland?
  143. swagquark in Holland for research
  144. swagquark i made a new something for my PhD
  145. swagquark and they are testing it at Leiden University
  146. swagquark and i want to be there to watch and get free food n stuff
  147. swagquark all you can eat sushi everyday and their government is going to pay for it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  148. ErinYu I probably wouldn't understand what you made.. but nice!
  149. ErinYu Like a physical object or a theory of some sort?
  150. swagquark physical object
  151. swagquark have you heard of photonics?
  152. swagquark basically I made a new kind of sensor for circuits that use photons instead of electronics (electronics)
  153. swagquark and i say that noting that it took my too long and i wish none of that upon you
  154. swagquark me*
  155. swagquark dont make something new. its horrible
  156. ErinYu Photons instead of electrons or electronics?
  157. swagquark well electronics throw electrons around, photonics throw photons around
  158. ErinYu So like you generate energy from photons instead of electrons?
  159. swagquark basically yes
  160. ErinYu Pretty cool :) I'll read up on that some time
  161. swagquark so do you have a rating OTB?
  162. ErinYu Though I'll probably abandon when the math starts getting vector-y
  163. ErinYu I have a FIDE part result somewhere between 1900 and 2000. That was last year, though.
  164. swagquark noice
  165. ErinYu And one of the strong opponents didn't have a FIDE rating either so it didn't factor into my part result :(
  166. swagquark cest la vie
  167. ErinYu I'm actually working on something to model a player's moves and their estimated FIDE rating
  168. swagquark as in positional middlegame stuff?
  169. ErinYu I saw some others did that but I didn't have the patience to go through their math... so I'm trying a more empirical fit.
  170. ErinYu What others did was take engine evaluations and fit some probabilistic model to the centipawn differences (all parts of the game).
  171. swagquark sure
  172. ErinYu But that's a lot of work if a random wants to get a quick estimate.
  173. ErinYu So I'm fitting an empirical model to a bunch of variables like % best move, % blunders, etc.
  174. ErinYu And hoping that's easier.
  175. ErinYu It says for the first 4 rounds of this season, the average board 1 skill is ~2000 FIDE, which I guess is reasonable?
  176. swagquark maybe
  177. swagquark i feel like counting blunders would require more data, rather than less
  178. ErinYu There are a few masters and 2100 players in here, so I guess as an average it's decent.
  179. ErinYu The biggest issue I have right now is that it says Steinitz and others played at a 1900 level (on average), so I don't know.
  180. swagquark oh thats interesting
  181. swagquark i didnt know that
  182. ErinYu A lot of players suggest Steinitz would be 2300+ today
  183. swagquark i would hope so
  184. ErinYu But considering he founded positional chess... his positional skills probably weren't good in 1890
  185. swagquark yeah i was thinking that
  186. swagquark its easier to learn things that make them yourself for the first time
  187. swagquark so he would have caught up pretty quickly
  188. ErinYu Like if Morphy, Alekhine etc. could play today, they'd be super GMs. But even without that chess.com's CAPS disagrees
  189. swagquark context be important
  190. swagquark especially morphy
  191. swagquark i mean, if you know your opponents are going to play like 1400s, you dont need to play like a 2700 to win, a sound 1800 performance
  192. swagquark will get the job done
  193. swagquark and it some ways is a better strategy
  194. ErinYu Yeah, that's one reason I don't want to try and guess any one player's rating yet. Since playstyles matter.
  195. swagquark in any case, i gotta go or else im going to have to walk home
  196. swagquark lovely chatting with you =)
  197. ErinYu But if you average a bunch of players the results are super linear for all the variables I have
  198. ErinYu Yeah, I have to have dinner. Hope to continue this some time! :)
  199. swagquark sure. maybe with a game in between
  200. swagquark see ya