lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
0.0
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e40.0e5+0.12Nf3+0.2Nc6+0.33Bc4+0.2Bc5+0.24b4?!−0.5...Inaccuracy. c3 was best.4.c3Nf65.d3[...]4...Bxb40.05c3−0.4Ba5−0.36d4−0.2d6−0.17dxe5−0.7Bb6?!+0.1Inaccuracy. Bg4 was best.7...Bg48.Bg5Qxg5[...]8O-O−0.3h6?!+0.4Inaccuracy. dxe5 was best.8...dxe59.Qxd8+9Ba3+0.2Bc5??+2.2Blunder. dxe5 was best.9...dxe510Bxc5+2.3dxc5+2.111Qxd8+??+0.4...Blunder. Qb3 was best.11.Qb3Na511...Nxd8+0.612Nbd2?!−0.4...Inaccuracy. Ne1 was best.12.Ne112...Be6?!+0.6Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best.12...Nc613.Bd5Nge7[...]13Bd5??−1.1...Blunder. Bb5+ was best.13.Bb5+c613...Ne7−1.014Bxe6−1.1Nxe6−1.015Nh4?−2.5...Mistake. Rfd1 was best.15.Rfd115...O-O-O−2.416Nc4−2.6Rd3?!−1.7Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best.16...Nc617Rac1?!−2.6...Inaccuracy. Rfc1 was best.17.Rfc117...Rhd8?!−1.4Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best.17...Nc618.a418a4?!−2.0...Inaccuracy. f4 was best.18.f418...Nf4−1.719Kh1??−4.9...Blunder. Rfe1 was best.19.Rfe1R3d720.Rb1[...]19...Ne2−4.420Rb1?!−6.2...Inaccuracy. Rce1 was best.20.Rce1Nxc321.Nf5[...]20...Nxc3−5.921Rb3?!−8.2...Inaccuracy. Rbc1 was best.21.Rbc1Nxe422.g4[...]21...Rd1−8.122Ne3−8.0Rxf1+−8.123Nxf1−8.2Rd1−8.024Kg1?#−2...Checkmate is now unavoidable. g3 was best.24.g3Rxf1+25.Kg2[...]24...Ne2+#−125Kh1#−1Rxf1#
0-1
Checkmate • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/rcAeATJM"] [Date "2022.10.16"] [White "Lutin23"] [Black "twobits"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "rcAeATJM"] [UTCDate "2022.10.16"] [UTCTime "12:27:52"] [WhiteElo "1690"] [BlackElo "1599"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-21"] [BlackRatingDiff "+27"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "C52"] [Opening "Italian Game: Evans Gambit, Bronstein Defense"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4?! { (0.20 → -0.48) Inaccuracy. c3 was best. } (4. c3 Nf6 5. d3 a5 6. O-O d6 7. Re1 O-O 8. Nbd2 Bb6) 4... Bxb4 5. c3 Ba5 6. d4 d6 { C52 Italian Game: Evans Gambit, Bronstein Defense } 7. dxe5 Bb6?! { (-0.66 → 0.05) Inaccuracy. Bg4 was best. } (7... Bg4 8. Bg5 Qxg5 9. Nxg5 Bxd1 10. Bxf7+ Kf8 11. Bxg8 Kxg8 12. Kxd1) 8. O-O h6?! { (-0.33 → 0.42) Inaccuracy. dxe5 was best. } (8... dxe5 9. Qxd8+) 9. Ba3 Bc5?? { (0.17 → 2.16) Blunder. dxe5 was best. } (9... dxe5) 10. Bxc5 dxc5 11. Qxd8+?? { (2.13 → 0.36) Blunder. Qb3 was best. } (11. Qb3 Na5) 11... Nxd8 12. Nbd2?! { (0.61 → -0.36) Inaccuracy. Ne1 was best. } (12. Ne1) 12... Be6?! { (-0.36 → 0.57) Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best. } (12... Nc6 13. Bd5 Nge7 14. Nc4 Be6 15. Rfd1 O-O-O 16. Ne3 g5 17. h3 Rhf8 18. Rd2 Bd7 19. Ng4) 13. Bd5?? { (0.57 → -1.08) Blunder. Bb5+ was best. } (13. Bb5+ c6) 13... Ne7 14. Bxe6 Nxe6 15. Nh4? { (-1.04 → -2.53) Mistake. Rfd1 was best. } (15. Rfd1) 15... O-O-O 16. Nc4 Rd3?! { (-2.65 → -1.66) Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best. } (16... Nc6) 17. Rac1?! { (-1.66 → -2.64) Inaccuracy. Rfc1 was best. } (17. Rfc1) 17... Rhd8?! { (-2.64 → -1.43) Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best. } (17... Nc6 18. a4) 18. a4?! { (-1.43 → -2.04) Inaccuracy. f4 was best. } (18. f4) 18... Nf4 19. Kh1?? { (-1.67 → -4.92) Blunder. Rfe1 was best. } (19. Rfe1 R3d7 20. Rb1 Nc6 21. Nf5 h5 22. h4 g6 23. Nfe3 Re8 24. f3 Nxe5 25. Nxe5 Rxe5) 19... Ne2 20. Rb1?! { (-4.39 → -6.21) Inaccuracy. Rce1 was best. } (20. Rce1 Nxc3 21. Nf5 Nxf5 22. exf5 R3d4 23. Ne3 Re8 24. f4 Rxa4 25. g4 b5 26. h4 Ne4) 20... Nxc3 21. Rb3?! { (-5.94 → -8.18) Inaccuracy. Rbc1 was best. } (21. Rbc1 Nxe4 22. g4 b6 23. f4 g5 24. Nf5 Nxf5 25. gxf5 R3d4 26. e6 fxe6 27. fxg5 Nxg5) 21... Rd1 22. Ne3 Rxf1+ 23. Nxf1 Rd1 24. Kg1? { (-8.03 → Mate in 2) Checkmate is now unavoidable. g3 was best. } (24. g3 Rxf1+ 25. Kg2 Nxe4 26. Re3 Rxf2+ 27. Kg1 Rb2 28. Rxe4 Kd7 29. Ng2 Nd5 30. Ne1 b6) 24... Ne2+ 25. Kh1 Rxf1# { Black wins by checkmate. } 0-1
6 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
3 Blunders
79 Average centipawn loss
76%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
5 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
39 Average centipawn loss
85%Accuracy
  1. twobits (4.b4) as expected
  2. twobits (7.dxe5) first surprise, i saw they play 0-0 here
  3. twobits (7.dxe5) iirc i should give away the pawn here
  4. twobits (7.dxe5) then again, maybe that was only after Qb3
  5. twobits (8.O-O) Bg4 seems to run into Bxf7+
  6. twobits (8.O-O) can't decide if h6 is a waste of time, or important to prevent shenanigans on g5
  7. twobits (8.O-O) also could take back now and possible get into an endgame
  8. twobits (8.O-O) really want to castle, though
  9. twobits (8...h6) hoping to at least frustrate my opponent, if nothing else
  10. twobits (9.Ba3) giving up another pawn would probably not be advised, though
  11. twobits (9.Ba3) Bc5 Bxf7+ Kxf7 Bxc5 and can't take back
  12. twobits (9.Ba3) no wait, the knight defends the queen
  13. twobits (11...Nxd8) worried about my piece activity here
  14. twobits (12...Be6) given the chance, castle long or short? hmm
  15. Midnightokar Looks like Twobits has survived the Evans Gambit.
  16. Midnightokar Hopefully will develop pieces soon.
  17. twobits (13.Bd5) interesting. i suppose they'd like me to fix their pawn structure.
  18. twobits (13.Bd5) gotta watch out from Rb1, and the discoveries against my rook there
  19. twobits (13...Ne7) castling long doesn't seem appealing anymore i suppose
  20. twobits (13...Ne7) just need to activate my rooks somehow asap
  21. twobits (13...Ne7) c4 coming?
  22. twobits (14.Bxe6) huh, that kinda solves some problems for me, i think
  23. twobits (14...Nxe6) hi tokar! hope you're writing down all your thoughts :D
  24. Midnightokar 14. My plan here would be to castle kingside and push the queenside pawns.
  25. twobits (14...Nxe6) castling long suddenly seems quite nice again
  26. twobits (15.Nh4) preparing f4?
  27. twobits (15.Nh4) or Ndf3 if i castle long, maybe
  28. twobits (15.Nh4) g5 Nf5 doesn't look like a good idea
  29. twobits (15...O-O-O) you live only once, supposedly
  30. twobits (15...O-O-O) /me waves to alen and kuma
  31. alen111 maybe 16...g6 to overprotect f5?
  32. twobits (16.Nc4) of course, if i want to push my queenside pawn majority, castling there might not have been a great idea
  33. chatakkuma g6 looks like a good idea
  34. chatakkuma I think black should consolidate with b6 and try to hold this
  35. twobits (16.Nc4) c3 looks like a good target to go after
  36. chatakkuma and use the d file
  37. chatakkuma i was looking at Rd3 too, only thing concerned was Nf5
  38. twobits (17.Rac1) going Ng6-Nf4-Ne2 could've been nice, but of course they can take on g6 and ruin my structure, plus create a passer
  39. twobits (17.Rac1) doubling rooks seems like a no-brainer i suppose
  40. twobits (17.Rac1) doh didn't notice i can just go Nf4 immediate
  41. chatakkuma if there's only one open file, controlling that file is important. Nf4 seems logical too
  42. twobits (17.Rac1) Nf4 Rfe1 and then what
  43. twobits (17.Rac1) if i double rooks they're likely to go Nf5, do i have to undouble their pawns there? hmm
  44. twobits (17.Rac1) undouble/double again, though...
  45. twobits (17.Rac1) clock is getting low, as always
  46. twobits (17.Rac1) maybe a profilactic g6 to restrict the knight
  47. twobits (17.Rac1) that would make a hole on f6 though, which seems possible to get to
  48. twobits (17...Rhd8) too much time thinking
  49. twobits (17...Rhd8) shouldn't've spent 10 minutes on this move tbh
  50. alen111 (17) it is a complicated position; the candidate moves g6, Nf4, Rhd8 all have pros and cons to consider
  51. pepellou Hi guys - is there an extension you use to automatically put the move number (17) or are you typing it each time? :)
  52. alen111 I still like 18...g6
  53. twobits (18.a4) not sure if they're planning to checkmate me without the queen with this
  54. alen111 I don't know pepe, I think there has been talk of implementing that, don't know if it was ever done
  55. twobits (18.a4) can i just ignore it? gonna go for activity
  56. alen111 I think a4 is guarding against a potential b5 probably
  57. pepellou thx alen, no problem
  58. pepellou yes, a4 prob stopping b5 for now (although b6-a6-b5 can happen later)
  59. pepellou (18) Black threatens Ne2+ collecting c3
  60. twobits (19.Kh1) wait that give me the c pawn, doesn't it?
  61. pepellou 19.Kh1 doesn't stop the threat... I thought Rfe1 was kind of unique
  62. twobits (19.Kh1) need to make sure my knight doesn't get trapped there, though
  63. pepellou from c3 it attacks 2 undefended pawns - I don't think it'll get trapped :P
  64. twobits (19...Ne2) back rank tactics, possibly?
  65. twobits (19...Ne2) Rc2 Rd1 does that work?
  66. pepellou found this extension to maybe show the move numbers: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/lichessorg-chatwhisper-wi/gljgfgfejfcopcjhaie
  67. twobits (20...Nxc3) this looks really good for me, but i've screwed up better positions, gotta be careful
  68. pepellou (20) (20) Black's collecting stuff, indeed looking good - the only slight concern is the clock maybe
  69. pepellou (20) aha, the extension worked, somehow... I see duplicated number
  70. pepellou (20) fine now, no move only number, but good enough :)
  71. Midnightokar I gotta go now and play my game. Good luck two bits!
  72. pepellou (20) good luck midnight
  73. twobits (21.Rb3) does Rd1 work?!
  74. pepellou (21) seems good to me
  75. twobits (21...Rd1) Nd2 R8xd2
  76. twobits (21...Rd1) i can't refute it
  77. pepellou (22) yup, Ne3 more logical than Nd2 but still seems crushing
  78. twobits (22.Ne3) jeez missed this move
  79. pepellou (22) ha ha
  80. twobits (22.Ne3) still, take and pin?
  81. alen111 RxR and then Re1 ?
  82. pepellou (22) time trouble is what happens, you miss moves - but still great
  83. pepellou (22) yup
  84. alen111 I mean RxR and Rd1
  85. pepellou (22) then N is lost too
  86. alen111 right
  87. pepellou (22) bc Kg1 there's Ne2
  88. alen111 Yes, I saw that far
  89. pepellou (22) (22) alen, I think I'll be your board 1 on next round
  90. alen111 ah cool, you are subbing for us?
  91. pepellou (23) just accepted the alternate message from chesster and happy to catch these 2 games of the team today
  92. pepellou (23) yup
  93. alen111 great
  94. pepellou (24) oh Kg1 nice
  95. pepellou (24) hope he sees the finish
  96. twobits (24.Kg1) nooo they had to make luft didn't they?!
  97. pepellou (24) ha ha good
  98. alen111 oh wow, yes, I hope so too; it seems twobits is on it
  99. pepellou (25) yeah the part of the game I've seen he was merciless
  100. pepellou (25) gg
  101. alen111 gg
  102. alen111 this covers for my bad game yesterday too!
  103. pepellou (25) ha ha, I'm happy to have this captain ^_^
  104. twobits oh wow, turns out i did have to take 9..dxe5
  105. twobits but 10.Qb3 looked really bad for me
  106. pepellou yup, the typical problem on f7 in the Evans gambit
  107. twobits looks like i just had to calculate that i can defend and castle in time
  108. pepellou after Qb3, Na5 doesn't work when White can just Bxf7 and Qa4 or Qb5
  109. twobits or Qe6# heh
  110. twobits but just 10...Qf6 and all is well
  111. twobits thanks to the timely Bb6
  112. pepellou thanks to dxe5 in that case (getting f6 for the queen)
  113. pepellou honestly dxe5 is bold, needs precise calculation
  114. twobits yes, that too heheh
  115. pepellou I would probably have considered Nge7, Qd7 stuff like that preventing Qb3
  116. pepellou I started watching this game on move 18 and I'm impressed twobits - strong and clean conversion, gg
  117. twobits just finished reading through the chat, thanks pepellou, and welcome!
  118. twobits yes, it's ipr's extension, not sure if that's the link you posted, it doesn't work for me
  119. twobits posting it here too, link is https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/422291-lichess-whisper-switch-by-ipr
  120. twobits looks like 7...Bg4 is the top move. interesting, i was looking at that in a different move order, but didn't think of it here.