lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2e5+0.12Nf3+0.2Nc6+0.13Bb5+0.2a6+0.24Ba4+0.4Nf6+0.25d3+0.1b50.06Bb3+0.1Bc5+0.27O-O+0.1d6+0.18c3+0.1h6+0.19Nbd20.0O-O−0.110a40.0Rb8−0.111axb5+0.1axb50.012h3+0.1Re80.013Re1+0.2Be6+0.214Bxe6+0.1Rxe6+0.115Nf1+0.1d50.016Qe2−0.1d4?!+0.6Inaccuracy. Bd6 was best.16...Bd617Ng3+0.3dxc3+0.418bxc3+0.4b4+0.519cxb4+0.3Nd4+0.520Nxd4+0.5Bxd4+0.421Rb1+0.4Bc3+0.922Bd2+1.1Bxd2+0.823Qxd2+0.9Reb6+1.324Qc3+1.0Qd4+1.325Qxc7+1.3R6b7+1.226Qc4+0.8Qxc4+0.827dxc4+0.9Rxb4+0.928Rxb4+0.8Rxb4+0.829Rc1+0.8g6+1.230c5+0.7Ne8?!+1.9Inaccuracy. Rb7 was best.30...Rb731f3+2.0Kf8+2.132Nf1+2.1Nc7?!+2.8Inaccuracy. Rb3 was best.32...Rb333.Rc2Nc7[...]33Ne3+3.0Ke8+3.834Nd5+3.1Rb7?+5.4Mistake. Nxd5 was best.34...Nxd535.exd5Rd4[...]35c6+5.3Ra7+5.336Rb1+5.4Kd8??#1Checkmate is now unavoidable. Kf8 was best.36...Kf837.Rb737Rb8#
1-0
Checkmate • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/lU0FViye"] [Date "2021.08.23"] [White "gaben1773"] [Black "El_bocadillo"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "lU0FViye"] [UTCDate "2021.08.23"] [UTCTime "18:30:00"] [WhiteElo "2059"] [BlackElo "2105"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+11"] [BlackRatingDiff "-14"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "C77"] [Opening "Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 Nf6 5. d3 { C77 Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation } b5 6. Bb3 Bc5 7. O-O d6 8. c3 h6 9. Nbd2 O-O 10. a4 Rb8 11. axb5 axb5 12. h3 Re8 13. Re1 Be6 14. Bxe6 Rxe6 15. Nf1 d5 16. Qe2 d4?! { (-0.15 → 0.56) Inaccuracy. Bd6 was best. } (16... Bd6) 17. Ng3 dxc3 18. bxc3 b4 19. cxb4 Nd4 20. Nxd4 Bxd4 21. Rb1 Bc3 22. Bd2 Bxd2 23. Qxd2 Reb6 24. Qc3 Qd4 25. Qxc7 R6b7 26. Qc4 Qxc4 27. dxc4 Rxb4 28. Rxb4 Rxb4 29. Rc1 g6 30. c5 Ne8?! { (0.73 → 1.85) Inaccuracy. Rb7 was best. } (30... Rb7) 31. f3 Kf8 32. Nf1 Nc7?! { (2.10 → 2.76) Inaccuracy. Rb3 was best. } (32... Rb3 33. Rc2 Nc7 34. Kf2 Ne6 35. c6 Rb8 36. Ne3 Rc8 37. Rc1 Ke7 38. Rc3 h5 39. h4) 33. Ne3 Ke8 34. Nd5 Rb7? { (3.14 → 5.37) Mistake. Nxd5 was best. } (34... Nxd5 35. exd5 Rd4 36. d6 Kd8 37. Ra1 f5 38. Ra8+ Kd7 39. Ra7+ Kd8 40. Rh7 h5 41. Rh6) 35. c6 Ra7 36. Rb1 Kd8?? { (5.39 → Mate in 1) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Kf8 was best. } (36... Kf8 37. Rb7) 37. Rb8# { White wins by checkmate. } 1-0
10
gaben1773El_bocadillo
10
gaben1773 +11
0 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
8 Average centipawn loss
97%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
El_bocadillo −14
3 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
1 Blunder
34 Average centipawn loss
89%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense
  1. El_bocadillo did not expect 7 0-0, but rather 7 c3, but now after 8 c3 we have transposed
  2. El_bocadillo 11 axb5, now I'm on my own
  3. El_bocadillo I don't think this is too common
  4. El_bocadillo my plan is to go Re8 and Be6
  5. El_bocadillo after h6 I don't think I have to worry about d4 so my bishop is safe on c5
  6. El_bocadillo If Re1 and Nf1 I had to play Bb6 to not land in a fork on d5 if I plan to recapture with the rook on e6
  7. El_bocadillo 14 If Nf1 now I might have d5
  8. El_bocadillo 14 I wonder if taking over the a-file in the future also might be something worth pursuing
  9. Mackjalek97 Go bocadillo!
  10. El_bocadillo 15 Now the threat is d4-d5
  11. El_bocadillo would like to play d5 myself, otherwise I'm thinking Bb6
  12. gaben1773 not easy to evaluate. We're going to argue that the e6 rook is misplaced and that h6 was weakening to the kingside.
  13. gaben1773 the exchange of LSB also means that f5 is inviting for a knight, and g6 is not so easy because of h6 being included
  14. gaben1773 b5-b4 may become an issue
  15. El_bocadillo 16 Qe2, did not even considder that move for some reason. Calculated a lot of pawn lines in the centre though
  16. gaben1773 rather amusing! We're very likely to wind up in a Najdorf structure after dxc3 and b4 are played
  17. Lelouch_Vi_Brittania 21..c5 looked strong, to attack the pawn and cement the bishop
  18. El_bocadillo Rec1 and I think I have made some mistakes
  19. El_bocadillo 24
  20. El_bocadillo Briefly looked at 24 ... Nd7 as well but looked terribly passive, especially after Nf4
  21. El_bocadillo 25 ...R6b7 avoiding Rxb4, Qxb8 Rxb8, Rxb8
  22. El_bocadillo 34 forgot the knight hits the rook. I'm completely screwed now
  23. gaben1773 @El_bocadillo I thought b4 was where you started to go wrong. You got the d4 square but I had good counterplay
  24. gaben1773 It was like a Najdorf where I had exchanged my bad bishop
  25. El_bocadillo Hey, sry lost connection for a second
  26. gaben1773 I was calculating a ton of lines after something like 18...Rd6
  27. gaben1773 All good!
  28. El_bocadillo Yeah in retrospect I regret b5, but in the game I got too focused on the d4 square
  29. El_bocadillo thought that your pawn would become a liability
  30. gaben1773 Yeah the main issue is that I think I can just sac the pawn if needed and get good counterplay against e5 or the kingside with Nf5
  31. El_bocadillo Yeah I was looking at 18 ...Rd6 as well, but did not like Rd1 followed by Nf4
  32. El_bocadillo Nf5*
  33. gaben1773 Ah yeah that makes sense
  34. El_bocadillo felt like you had too strong of an initiative there
  35. El_bocadillo Honestly now when I see the engine reccomending 16 ...Bd6 it makes so much sense. I'm happy with freeing my pieces a little after d4 and
  36. El_bocadillo I overprotect d4 so that you can't take on d5
  37. El_bocadillo meant overprotect e5 of course
  38. gaben1773 Yeah! Plus I think b5-b4 is much stronger without having d5-d4 played
  39. gaben1773 there's serious queenside play with taking the a-file and/or opening the b-file
  40. gaben1773 But alright I need to grab some dinner! Thank you for the game
  41. El_bocadillo How come you think it is a lot stronger without d5 played?
  42. El_bocadillo I don't question it, I just don't have enough experience in these kinds of positions
  43. gaben1773 If d4 is played then after b5-b4 I can go c4 to close the queenside. You get a passed pawn but my play on the kingside is coming fast
  44. gaben1773 without d4 you can play d5xc4 if I try to push past on b5-b4
  45. El_bocadillo but otherwise I can open up the centre and calm your attack that way
  46. El_bocadillo makes a lot of sense
  47. El_bocadillo or at least some, nothing in chess makes a lot of sense :D
  48. gaben1773 Yeah you have that option too! And yeah lol. I play the Taimanov sicilian so I've studied these structures a lot and I still understand....
  49. gaben1773 maybe 10% of it
  50. gaben1773 (at best)
  51. El_bocadillo wow you had a 7 average centipawn loss haha
  52. El_bocadillo insane!
  53. gaben1773 I know! I think that's the best I've ever had
  54. gaben1773 I had a 13 centipawn loss last season
  55. El_bocadillo That's also pretty good
  56. El_bocadillo I'm a bit impressed that I was crushed with 34 this game
  57. El_bocadillo I know the stat doesn't say too much, but still
  58. gaben1773 Yeah I thought you played well through the opening and we
  59. gaben1773 ren't too bad off in the ending. I think it should have been holdable. The ending was where it really fell apart
  60. gaben1773 I thought 32... f5 was interesting to try to trade off some pawns and get some counterplay
  61. El_bocadillo I know, I'm a bit bummed about it, but I am also currently solely focusing on endgames so I'm at least working in the right area
  62. gaben1773 What endgame work are you doing right now?
  63. El_bocadillo going through Silmands coimplete endgame manual as a start and was planning to do endgame studies after
  64. El_bocadillo or during, but haven't really started with the studies yet
  65. gaben1773 Cool! I did a little bit of 100 EYMK but got bored. I wound up reading Endgame strategy and doing some Dvoretsky studies
  66. gaben1773 I've heard good stuff about Silman's book
  67. El_bocadillo Did you feel like you improved?
  68. El_bocadillo or that it was well invested time?
  69. El_bocadillo ofc some improvement was made
  70. gaben1773 The 100 EYMK not really. Endgame strategy yes!
  71. El_bocadillo cool!
  72. gaben1773 I feel like it gave me a better intuition for a lot of the positions
  73. gaben1773 The Dvoretsky studies are also useful, though a bit disheartening because you know there's a 0% chance you would solve one in a game
  74. El_bocadillo I also tried 100 EYMK and felt the same as you, didn't really get any intuition
  75. El_bocadillo and that is what I desperately need
  76. El_bocadillo I might check out Endgame strategy
  77. El_bocadillo sounds promising
  78. gaben1773 Yeah and it's just very dry too. I would strongly recommend it! It's a lot more engaging than most endgame books
  79. gaben1773 (very dry refering to 100 EYMK
  80. gaben1773 I need to grab some dinner! Thank you for the game and good luck for the rest of the season!
  81. El_bocadillo agreed with that!
  82. El_bocadillo same to you!
  83. El_bocadillo one final question