lichess.org
Donate
30:00
30:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2c5+0.32c30.0e6+0.23Nf3+0.1d5+0.14e5+0.2Nc6+0.45d4+0.1cxd4+0.46cxd40.0Bb4+?!+0.8Inaccuracy. Nge7 was best.6...Nge77.Nc3Nf5[...]7Bd2?!0.0...Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best.7.Nc3Nge78.Bd3[...]7...Nge7?!+0.8Inaccuracy. Qb6 was best.7...Qb68.Be2Nge7[...]8Bxb4+0.8Nxb4+0.89Qa4+?!−0.1...Inaccuracy. a3 was best.9.a3Nbc610.Bd3[...]9...Nbc6−0.210Bd3−0.1Qa5+?!+0.7Inaccuracy. Qb6 was best.10...Qb611.Qb511Qxa5+0.6Nxa5+0.712O-O?!+0.1...Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best.12.Nc312...Bd7−0.113Nbd20.0O-O0.014Rac1−0.4Rac8−0.615b4−0.5Nac60.016a30.0a6+0.617Nb30.0b6+0.218Rc3??−4.7...Blunder. Nfd2 was best.18.Nfd2Nb819.Rxc8[...]18...a5??0.0Blunder. Nxe5 was best.18...Nxe519.Rxc819Bb5??−2.1...Blunder. bxa5 was best.19.bxa5Nxa520.Rxc8[...]19...axb4−1.720axb4−1.7Nxb4?!−0.9Inaccuracy. Nxe5 was best.20...Nxe521.Rxc821Rxc8−0.8Bxc8−0.722Rc1?−2.4...Mistake. Rb1 was best.22.Rb122...Ba6−2.123Rc7?!−3.1...Inaccuracy. Bxa6 was best.23.Bxa623...Bxb5−3.024Rxe7−2.9Bc4?!−2.1Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best.24...Nc625Rb7−2.4b5−2.326Nbd2?!−3.1...Inaccuracy. h4 was best.26.h4Ra827.h5[...]26...Ra8−2.927h3?!−4.2...Inaccuracy. h4 was best.27.h427...Nd3−4.228Nxc4?−7.3...Mistake. g4 was best.28.g4h629.g5[...]28...bxc4−7.229Kf1−8.3h6−8.530Ke2−8.5Ra2+−8.531Nd2−8.5Nf4+−8.632Kf3−9.0Rxd2−9.133Kxf4−9.1Rxd4+−8.434Ke3−8.5Re4+−8.535Kd2−8.5Rxe5−8.836Rb8+−8.3Kh7−8.437Rf8−8.7Kg6−8.738Kc3−9.2Re2−9.3
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/j5bV7Muz"] [Date "2021.11.28"] [White "noeom"] [Black "BamaBeeblebrox"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "j5bV7Muz"] [UTCDate "2021.11.28"] [UTCTime "13:59:52"] [WhiteElo "1722"] [BlackElo "1744"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-16"] [BlackRatingDiff "+26"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "1800+30"] [ECO "C02"] [Opening "French Defense: Advance Variation, Paulsen Attack"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 c5 2. c3 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. e5 Nc6 5. d4 { C02 French Defense: Advance Variation, Paulsen Attack } cxd4 6. cxd4 Bb4+?! { (0.00 → 0.79) Inaccuracy. Nge7 was best. } (6... Nge7 7. Nc3 Nf5 8. Bb5 Bd7 9. O-O Rc8 10. Rb1 Nb4 11. Be2) 7. Bd2?! { (0.79 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best. } (7. Nc3 Nge7 8. Bd3 Nf5 9. O-O h6 10. Ne2 Be7 11. a3 Bd7) 7... Nge7?! { (0.00 → 0.75) Inaccuracy. Qb6 was best. } (7... Qb6 8. Be2 Nge7 9. O-O Nf5 10. Be3 Be7 11. Nc3 Qxb2 12. Nb5) 8. Bxb4 Nxb4 9. Qa4+?! { (0.82 → -0.11) Inaccuracy. a3 was best. } (9. a3 Nbc6 10. Bd3 Bd7 11. Nc3 O-O 12. Bc2 f6 13. Qd3 Ng6 14. exf6 Rxf6 15. h4 Nf8) 9... Nbc6 10. Bd3 Qa5+?! { (-0.08 → 0.67) Inaccuracy. Qb6 was best. } (10... Qb6 11. Qb5) 11. Qxa5 Nxa5 12. O-O?! { (0.65 → 0.05) Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best. } (12. Nc3) 12... Bd7 13. Nbd2 O-O 14. Rac1 Rac8 15. b4 Nac6 16. a3 a6 17. Nb3 b6 18. Rc3?? { (0.23 → -4.74) Blunder. Nfd2 was best. } (18. Nfd2 Nb8 19. Rxc8 Rxc8 20. Rc1 g5 21. f3 Ba4 22. Kf2 Kg7 23. Ke3 h6 24. Rxc8 Nxc8) 18... a5?? { (-4.74 → -0.04) Blunder. Nxe5 was best. } (18... Nxe5 19. Rxc8) 19. Bb5?? { (-0.04 → -2.07) Blunder. bxa5 was best. } (19. bxa5 Nxa5 20. Rxc8 Rxc8 21. Nxa5 bxa5 22. Rb1 Rc3 23. Rb8+ Nc8 24. Ne1 Kf8 25. Ba6 Ke7) 19... axb4 20. axb4 Nxb4?! { (-1.66 → -0.91) Inaccuracy. Nxe5 was best. } (20... Nxe5 21. Rxc8) 21. Rxc8 Bxc8 22. Rc1? { (-0.74 → -2.40) Mistake. Rb1 was best. } (22. Rb1) 22... Ba6 23. Rc7?! { (-2.12 → -3.10) Inaccuracy. Bxa6 was best. } (23. Bxa6) 23... Bxb5 24. Rxe7 Bc4?! { (-2.94 → -2.10) Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best. } (24... Nc6) 25. Rb7 b5 26. Nbd2?! { (-2.35 → -3.13) Inaccuracy. h4 was best. } (26. h4 Ra8 27. h5 h6 28. Nfd2 Nd3 29. Nc5 Nf4 30. Nf3 Nxh5 31. g3 g5 32. Kg2 g4) 26... Ra8 27. h3?! { (-2.94 → -4.21) Inaccuracy. h4 was best. } (27. h4) 27... Nd3 28. Nxc4? { (-4.18 → -7.27) Mistake. g4 was best. } (28. g4 h6 29. g5 Ra2 30. Kg2 Nf4+ 31. Kh2 Nh5 32. Kg2 Ra3 33. Rb8+ Kh7 34. Rf8 Ra7) 28... bxc4 29. Kf1 h6 30. Ke2 Ra2+ 31. Nd2 Nf4+ 32. Kf3 Rxd2 33. Kxf4 Rxd4+ 34. Ke3 Re4+ 35. Kd2 Rxe5 36. Rb8+ Kh7 37. Rf8 Kg6 38. Kc3 Re2 { White resigns. } 0-1
01
noeomBamaBeeblebrox
01
noeom −16
6 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
2 Blunders
58 Average centipawn loss
78%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
BamaBeeblebrox +26
5 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
33 Average centipawn loss
85%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
French Defense: Advance Variation
1
  1. noeom there we go
  2. BamaBeeblebrox I think you went wrong on 19. Bb5. It seemed as though my knight was pinned, but it really wasn't.
  3. noeom yes, I still had doubts after calculating
  4. noeom but it gave up a pawn
  5. BamaBeeblebrox Gave up a pawn, and gave me a passed pawn.
  6. noeom Yes
  7. noeom it was surely a mistake
  8. BamaBeeblebrox I thought hard after you played 25. Rb7, but I don't think I'm able to take the knight due to my own back rank. I looked at 26.Bxb3 Rxc6
  9. BamaBeeblebrox 27. Rc1 and you can't capture my knight because of your back rank but then I have to defend my own back rank and don't have time to play Rc4
  10. noeom I thought I could recover material after 25. Rb7
  11. noeom Because I thought I had at least a tempo due to your back rank, yes
  12. BamaBeeblebrox What did you think of the opening? I don't know much about the c3 Sicilian games, and I felt like you had a solid position.
  13. BamaBeeblebrox Right. That's why I eventually decided to defend the pawn with b5.
  14. noeom I used the opening explorer to study your openings against 1. e4 and get a playable position, that's why. I was on book until 6. Bb4+
  15. BamaBeeblebrox Nice. I have family visiting, so I didn't have time to prepare much, but I expected the c3 Sicilian.
  16. noeom yes, that's what I usually play (Alapin)
  17. BamaBeeblebrox Bb4 check felt like a good way to develop with tempo and possibly trade pieces since you had more space. I usually don't want to lose the
  18. BamaBeeblebrox dark square bishop, though.
  19. noeom I was happy to trade your strong bishop for my weak one, yes
  20. noeom even more with those blocked pawns in the center
  21. BamaBeeblebrox I agree
  22. noeom Looks like I failed to properlyl control the open file and were too anxious. Maybe building up the pressure and keeping it would have worked
  23. noeom better
  24. noeom For some reason, looks like 18. Rc3 is also terrible. I guess it has to do with the continuation Nxe5 (sf says) and, no matter what, Nxf3
  25. noeom witch check
  26. noeom I'll study these mistakes later today :-)
  27. noeom I don't want to keep you here if you have family around. Thanks a lot for the game and the postmortem.
  28. BamaBeeblebrox Yes, I thought Rc3 was fine, but it looks like there was a tactic.
  29. BamaBeeblebrox Same to you. Thank you! Good luck in your upcoming games.
  30. noeom same to you!
  31. noeom see you around!