lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2c5+0.32Nc3+0.2e6+0.13Nf3+0.2d5?!+0.9Inaccuracy. a6 was best.3...a64.d4cxd4[...]4exd5+0.7exd5+1.05d4?!+0.3...Inaccuracy. Bb5+ was best.5.Bb5+Nc66.d4[...]5...cxd4?!+1.3Inaccuracy. c4 was best.5...c46.g3h6[...]6Nxd4+0.7Nf6??+2.5Blunder. a6 was best.6...a67.Be2Nf6[...]7Bg5?+0.8...Mistake. Bb5+ was best.7.Bb5+Bd78.Qe2+[...]7...Bb4?!+1.5Inaccuracy. Be7 was best.7...Be78.Bb5+Bd7[...]8Qd3?+0.3...Mistake. Bb5+ was best.8.Bb5+Bd78...O-O+0.39Ne2+0.3Nc6+0.610O-O-O+0.6d4?!+1.5Inaccuracy. h6 was best.10...h611.Bh411Nb5?−0.1...Mistake. Nxd4 was best.11.Nxd4Bxc312.Qxc3[...]11...Qd5+0.112Bxf6+0.2Qxa2+0.113c3+0.1Qa1+??+2.8Blunder. gxf6 was best.13...gxf614.Nexd414Qb1+2.4Qxb1++2.415Kxb1+2.5Bf5+?!+3.5Inaccuracy. gxf6 was best.15...gxf616.cxb4Bf5+[...]16Ka1?!+2.3...Inaccuracy. Kc1 was best.16.Kc116...gxf6+2.617cxb4+2.2a5+2.418bxa5??+0.4...Blunder. b3 was best.18.b3Bc219.Rd2[...]18...Rxa5++0.419Na3+0.3Nb4?!+1.2Inaccuracy. b5 was best.19...b520.Rc1d3[...]20Ng3+1.4Nc2++1.721Ka2+1.4Be6++1.522Kb1+1.4Nxa3++1.123bxa3+1.3Rxa3+1.424Rd3?0.0...Mistake. Rxd4 was best.24.Rxd4f524...Ra2?!+1.0Inaccuracy. Ra4 was best.24...Ra425.Rd2Rfa8[...]25Be2+0.7Rfa8+0.826Rxd4+1.0Bf5+?+2.6Mistake. Ra1+ was best.26...Ra1+27.Kc227Nxf5+2.9Ra1++2.728Kc2+2.5Rxh1+2.929h3+2.3Rha1+2.430Bc4+2.2Kf8?+3.9Mistake. b5 was best.30...b531.Bb331Rd7+3.9b5+4.432Rxf7++4.2Ke8+3.933Nd6++4.3Kd8+4.234Rf8++3.8Kd7+4.035Rxa8+3.9Rxa8+4.036Nxb5+4.0Rg8??+21.7Blunder. f5 was best.36...f537.Kd337Bxg8+54.4
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/ir40wE2B"] [Date "2021.12.24"] [White "pie314271"] [Black "scvrf"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "ir40wE2B"] [UTCDate "2021.12.24"] [UTCTime "02:01:25"] [WhiteElo "2054"] [BlackElo "1987"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+20"] [BlackRatingDiff "-12"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "B23"] [Opening "Sicilian Defense: Closed"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 e6 { B23 Sicilian Defense: Closed } 3. Nf3 d5?! { (0.16 → 0.90) Inaccuracy. a6 was best. } (3... a6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Nxd4 b5 6. Bd3 Bb7 7. O-O Nc6 8. Nxc6) 4. exd5 exd5 5. d4?! { (0.97 → 0.28) Inaccuracy. Bb5+ was best. } (5. Bb5+ Nc6 6. d4 Nf6 7. O-O Bg4 8. Bg5 Be7 9. dxc5 O-O) 5... cxd4?! { (0.28 → 1.26) Inaccuracy. c4 was best. } (5... c4 6. g3 h6 7. Qe2+ Be7 8. Bg2 Nf6 9. Ne5 Nc6 10. Be3) 6. Nxd4 Nf6?? { (0.72 → 2.51) Blunder. a6 was best. } (6... a6 7. Be2 Nf6 8. O-O Be7 9. Bf3 Nc6 10. Nde2 O-O 11. Nxd5) 7. Bg5? { (2.51 → 0.83) Mistake. Bb5+ was best. } (7. Bb5+ Bd7 8. Qe2+ Be7 9. Nf5 Kf8 10. Bxd7 Qxd7 11. Nxe7 Qxe7) 7... Bb4?! { (0.83 → 1.50) Inaccuracy. Be7 was best. } (7... Be7 8. Bb5+ Bd7 9. Bxd7+ Nbxd7 10. O-O O-O 11. Nf5 Re8 12. Re1) 8. Qd3? { (1.50 → 0.28) Mistake. Bb5+ was best. } (8. Bb5+ Bd7) 8... O-O 9. Ne2 Nc6 10. O-O-O d4?! { (0.60 → 1.50) Inaccuracy. h6 was best. } (10... h6 11. Bh4) 11. Nb5? { (1.50 → -0.07) Mistake. Nxd4 was best. } (11. Nxd4 Bxc3 12. Qxc3 Ne4 13. Bxd8 Nxc3 14. bxc3 Rxd8 15. Be2 Bd7 16. Bf3 Kf8 17. Rhe1 Rac8) 11... Qd5 12. Bxf6 Qxa2 13. c3 Qa1+?? { (0.11 → 2.77) Blunder. gxf6 was best. } (13... gxf6 14. Nexd4) 14. Qb1 Qxb1+ 15. Kxb1 Bf5+?! { (2.45 → 3.52) Inaccuracy. gxf6 was best. } (15... gxf6 16. cxb4 Bf5+ 17. Kc1 Rac8 18. Kd2 Rfd8 19. Rc1 a6 20. Na3 d3 21. Nf4 Rd4 22. Rc4) 16. Ka1?! { (3.52 → 2.29) Inaccuracy. Kc1 was best. } (16. Kc1) 16... gxf6 17. cxb4 a5 18. bxa5?? { (2.41 → 0.42) Blunder. b3 was best. } (18. b3 Bc2 19. Rd2 a4 20. Nc1 axb3+ 21. Kb2 Rfd8 22. Na3 Nxb4 23. Bc4 d3 24. Bxb3 Bxb3) 18... Rxa5+ 19. Na3 Nb4?! { (0.29 → 1.22) Inaccuracy. b5 was best. } (19... b5 20. Rc1 d3 21. Rxc6 dxe2 22. Bxe2 b4 23. Ra6 Re5 24. Bc4 bxa3 25. Rxa3 Be6 26. b3) 20. Ng3 Nc2+ 21. Ka2 Be6+ 22. Kb1 Nxa3+ 23. bxa3 Rxa3 24. Rd3? { (1.39 → 0.00) Mistake. Rxd4 was best. } (24. Rxd4 f5) 24... Ra2?! { (0.00 → 1.04) Inaccuracy. Ra4 was best. } (24... Ra4 25. Rd2 Rfa8 26. Rb2 Ra1+ 27. Kc2 Rc8+ 28. Kd3 Rd1+ 29. Ke4 Rcc1 30. Rxb7 Re1+ 31. Kxd4) 25. Be2 Rfa8 26. Rxd4 Bf5+? { (0.98 → 2.60) Mistake. Ra1+ was best. } (26... Ra1+ 27. Kc2) 27. Nxf5 Ra1+ 28. Kc2 Rxh1 29. h3 Rha1 30. Bc4 Kf8? { (2.23 → 3.85) Mistake. b5 was best. } (30... b5 31. Bb3) 31. Rd7 b5 32. Rxf7+ Ke8 33. Nd6+ Kd8 34. Rf8+ Kd7 35. Rxa8 Rxa8 36. Nxb5 Rg8?? { (3.95 → 21.74) Blunder. f5 was best. } (36... f5 37. Kd3) 37. Bxg8 { Black resigns. } 1-0
10
pie314271scvrf
10
pie314271 +20
2 Inaccuracies
4 Mistakes
1 Blunder
38 Average centipawn loss
87%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
scvrf −12
7 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
3 Blunders
65 Average centipawn loss
81%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Sicilian Defense: Closed
  1. gavalanche20 Huh, interesting, why not offer a transposition to an Open Sicilian I wonder
  2. scvrf Pretty sure I messed up my opening. Something feels off here.
  3. ATrueRavenclaw Well after 9. Ne2 it looks like the d5 pawn will drop or be sacrificed somehow
  4. pie314271 (9) wasted 10 mins looking for better
  5. pie314271 (9) but i hold d4 still
  6. ATrueRavenclaw I think 5...Nc6 or Nf6 would have been better
  7. pie314271 (9) i gotta find a better weapon vs e6 in any sicilian, lol
  8. doughorn Is there a tactic im missing
  9. scvrf embarrsing to miss this simple variation.
  10. scvrf This should be winning for white but I still have opportunity to create some more complications.
  11. scvrf But I think simply taking the bishop on b4 will do
  12. scvrf Seems like both of us was not happy with the opening :)
  13. pie314271 yup :)
  14. pie314271 i liked playing vs the isolated pawn at first, then it got messy
  15. scvrf Already on 3rd move I screwed up... I planned to review my lines in the morning before the game but decided to sleep in instead :)
  16. scvrf First day of holiday
  17. scvrf I think out of the opening you're simply better
  18. pie314271 looks like it
  19. scvrf So the only thing on my mind was to complicate
  20. scvrf And attack
  21. scvrf So I was happy I manged to do that at least...
  22. pie314271 i was so worried after a5, which i missed entirely
  23. scvrf Yeah I thought I might be even winning there
  24. scvrf Since you were so low on time also
  25. scvrf Ng3 was very unexpected
  26. pie314271 yes
  27. scvrf But seems like it's working... but maybe I had something better after that
  28. pie314271 Bg6 was my main concern after Ng3. maybe f4 after?
  29. scvrf I played Nc2 too fast
  30. scvrf I saw something that I realised after didn't work and wanted to keep the pressure
  31. pie314271 idk tho. its not easy to untangle as white, since the h1 rook is sealed away
  32. scvrf Yes I thought I at least had a draw there
  33. scvrf if not even winning
  34. scvrf But you managed to untangle well in time trouble
  35. pie314271 i guess so
  36. scvrf I was considering 20...Bc2
  37. pie314271 me as well
  38. scvrf 24.Rd3 is a good find as well. I think it may be forced
  39. pie314271 If you could add d3 to Bc2, i might be losing
  40. scvrf Yeah... I should have taken more time there.
  41. scvrf But maybe simply 21.Rxd4 is enough
  42. pie314271 maybe
  43. pie314271 for 24. Rd3, idk if Rxd4 straight away was better
  44. scvrf 24... Rc8 is strong, no?
  45. scvrf Threatening 25... Rb3+ and mate
  46. pie314271 good point, i then must go Rd2 or Rd3 after, and its not clear
  47. pie314271 or Rb4?
  48. scvrf Maybe yes
  49. scvrf And the night on g3 does a good job defending the rook in many lines so you don't have to worry about getting pinned on the first rank
  50. pie314271 yes, the g3 knight defends everything
  51. scvrf It looks a bit weird but really holds everything together
  52. scvrf Since it's far away from the action
  53. pie314271 at (13), i considered 13... gxf6 cxb4 Nxb4, you can use the c-file, maybe
  54. scvrf Yeah, to be honest when I was calculating Qxa2 I missed that you had Qb1 after the check...
  55. scvrf So I was a bit disencouraged at that point
  56. scvrf I was actually looking at 12... Bc5 for a long while
  57. scvrf Which was interesting but doesnt lead anywhere after Qb3 Qxb5 Nxd5
  58. scvrf But I liked the idea of bringing out the bishop with tempo and then putting the rook on the c file
  59. pie314271 i didnt see that, maybe 13. Qg3 threatening checkmate is good
  60. pie314271 oh, after Qxa2
  61. scvrf well after Qxa2 too, but I mainly looked at it before Qxa2
  62. scvrf 13.Qg3 I didn't consider actually
  63. pie314271 I see
  64. scvrf g6 seems forced
  65. scvrf It's still unclear even though you're up a piece
  66. pie314271 i agree
  67. scvrf my bishops are strong
  68. scvrf And Rc8 is coming
  69. scvrf But looks defendable
  70. scvrf I read Judith Polgar last night before bed. I must have been inspired
  71. scvrf Unfortunatley I don't have her tactical skills haha
  72. pie314271 lol, it looks promising at first tho
  73. pie314271 i guess a piece is still a piece
  74. scvrf I think 12... Bf5 13.Qb3 simply holds though
  75. scvrf 13... Qxb5 14.Nxd4
  76. scvrf It was an enjoyable game no matter what :)
  77. pie314271 looks accurate
  78. scvrf I have to ask... was pie314159 already taken
  79. pie314271 yes, kinda intense, still fun tho
  80. pie314271 idk, never tried lol
  81. scvrf Or does the numbers have some other significance?
  82. pie314271 but, i got this username from a friend
  83. scvrf aha okay
  84. pie314271 its the e = 2.71 thing, i think
  85. scvrf too advanced for me :)
  86. scvrf Alright, I'll gotta get started with christmas preparations
  87. scvrf Thanks for the game and happy holidays!
  88. pie314271 i have to as well, i guess
  89. pie314271 thanks, and happy holidays to you too!