Game analysis - My win vs a 2184#3 Yes, we agree. How is it possible sometime there is 2000 + but not very strong? | Di-Caprio |
Game analysis - My win vs a 2184#1 Hello guys, what do you think about my last game? Is that me who played good or my oponent who made errors? https://fr.lichess.org/vM4Bhu0bsn1M | Di-Caprio |
General Chess Discussion - Rank#18 No i think there is very hight level on blitz. | Di-Caprio |
General Chess Discussion - Rank#16 And i see on bullet and blitz you under 1600 so im right too, blitz peoples are better. | Di-Caprio |
General Chess Discussion - Rank#14 I just beated a 1800 in ranked, this is on blitz that peoples are the most amazing being only 1400 or 1500 | Di-Caprio |
General Chess Discussion - Rank#13 Ok but the thing i dont understand is: a 1200 in real life, is a complete beginner, so a 1400 is not amazing right? Here i see 1600 rank who know all openings traps and play really good... | Di-Caprio |
Game analysis - Bullet 1 min, first try#9 Thank you laminator. I made some errors because of fast moves, i mhappy a good player like you appreciate my games, because im self taught and i strated 1 year ago. | Di-Caprio |
Game analysis - Bullet 1 min, first try#7 I wait the answer abpit 60 or 1 + 0 , i have no idea too. Im dure the link show my bullet game but its wrote 60. And what do you think about my game? | Di-Caprio |
General Chess Discussion - Looking for friend With High skill#3 Thank you, i already followed some videos, but i learn nothing. I explain: there is so much combinations that i cant retain everything. Except some traps i didnt known, i learned playing hard alone on… | Di-Caprio |
Game analysis - Bullet 1 min, first try#5 Ok, it was an bullet 1+0 but i dont know why when i check my link, its wrote 60+0. | Di-Caprio |
Next |
---|