@The_Beserker said in #15:
> I feel like my openings aren't so good... Should I study them more seriously by now?
Yes. If you reached 2100 without a good opining repertory, it means you can do much better with a well chosen one. This is part of how I got to 2230 rapid/classical peak in 2016. It made me feel comfortable and familiarized with the games I played. I used surprise openings which either gave me positional advantage (if they played fast) or clock advantage (if they took the time to understand the surprise), to spend in the middlegame.
My suggestion is to download all of your games to use a tool that analyzes your strength in each main opening and then the variants of each opening. After understanding better what works better for your, your strengths and weaknesses, you can use another online tool to create your repertory.
The opening repertory results will be highly dependent on time control and opponents strength. For instance, a tricky variant may work in bullet/blitz or against weaker rapid opponents but not against stronger rapid opponents. So be aware that the kind of opening repertory should match the time control and opponent's range.
It is a lot of work, which can feel boring at first, but it pays off, which is then exciting.