The article is amazing !!!
It's scary how specifically accurate this is.
A lot of advice I'm reading from prominent teachers, i.e. Avetik, Noel Studer, Nate Solon, etc. advocates for playing a set number of blitz games in each session. In the first instance, this is to ensure that we take time to go back and review the games. Secondly, it can helps us to avoid tilt.
This article makes we think we could similarly set a certain algorithm for our blitz sets that allows us to play more games/additional sets, but only if we score above a predefined percentage in our earlier games, AND only if we are still feeling fresh and focused.
A lot of advice I'm reading from prominent teachers, i.e. Avetik, Noel Studer, Nate Solon, etc. advocates for playing a set number of blitz games in each session. In the first instance, this is to ensure that we take time to go back and review the games. Secondly, it can helps us to avoid tilt.
This article makes we think we could similarly set a certain algorithm for our blitz sets that allows us to play more games/additional sets, but only if we score above a predefined percentage in our earlier games, AND only if we are still feeling fresh and focused.
You are looking in my mind...
I play in lichess.org, not the page you mention
My snowball started rolling when I got 80 points of rating in the blitz one day, and I also asked myself this question - should I stop or go further? And I replied - I'm not going to stop every time I raise the rating a little bit, am I?
Therefore, I prefer not to stop there and move forward, even if I lost my rating today, I know that it will still recover.
And since then my snowball has not stopped!
I'm happy that I found out that someone thinks the same way I do.
Therefore, I prefer not to stop there and move forward, even if I lost my rating today, I know that it will still recover.
And since then my snowball has not stopped!
I'm happy that I found out that someone thinks the same way I do.
Hello