@cavalier-spaniel said in #9:
> War metaphors are as old as chess literature.
Just because it's old doesn't mean it's a good thing.
Also, chess itself as a war metaphor, why not. But people trying to push their ego/masculinity by comparing *Themselves* as warriors because they didnn't die after making a blunder, I still find that pathetic.
We are moving pieces on a board. Anyone who thinks of themselves as a warrior or a general or whatever because of that needs to come down of their high horses.
Especially when they push this wierd immage just to sell stuff, and especially Avetik, since they wrote a couple of articles with this metaphor, enough to know that they mean it seriously and see themselves as some kind of hero.
Edit :
Also, where does the metaphor ends? If we see chess players as warriors, why not starcraft players? Scrabble players? settlers of catan players? Ans if everyone is a "warrior", then no one is...
> War metaphors are as old as chess literature.
Just because it's old doesn't mean it's a good thing.
Also, chess itself as a war metaphor, why not. But people trying to push their ego/masculinity by comparing *Themselves* as warriors because they didnn't die after making a blunder, I still find that pathetic.
We are moving pieces on a board. Anyone who thinks of themselves as a warrior or a general or whatever because of that needs to come down of their high horses.
Especially when they push this wierd immage just to sell stuff, and especially Avetik, since they wrote a couple of articles with this metaphor, enough to know that they mean it seriously and see themselves as some kind of hero.
Edit :
Also, where does the metaphor ends? If we see chess players as warriors, why not starcraft players? Scrabble players? settlers of catan players? Ans if everyone is a "warrior", then no one is...