@BeepBeepImAsleep
Also, I checked the SF analysis and you had a bad position until your opponent's middlegame queen blunder. After your first 8 moves you had an SF score of -1.7, meaning that you are down the positional equivalent of 1.7 pawns. Your opening appears to violate not only theory (which can sometimes be fine for lower level players like us) but also seems to me to contradict basic chess principles like development, controlling the center, and never ever playing f3 in the opening. All possibility of castling is thrown to the side as well. I am by no means a chess expert, but I do know that the experts play both traditional and nontraditional openings by these principles.
Also, I checked the SF analysis and you had a bad position until your opponent's middlegame queen blunder. After your first 8 moves you had an SF score of -1.7, meaning that you are down the positional equivalent of 1.7 pawns. Your opening appears to violate not only theory (which can sometimes be fine for lower level players like us) but also seems to me to contradict basic chess principles like development, controlling the center, and never ever playing f3 in the opening. All possibility of castling is thrown to the side as well. I am by no means a chess expert, but I do know that the experts play both traditional and nontraditional openings by these principles.