@Nikkoi Wonderful.. this game features quite the attack :) give me a few days and I'll try to have something interesting for you
@SoothingDisturbance I added my comments and variations to your study... thanks for letting me contribute: lichess.org/study/I70q5ryK/An6HX6rh
This game was quite the challenge to analyze, but I tried to give advice and feedback where I could, and I pinpointed some improvements regarding your attack on the queenside (and possible miss in the center). I think you had a dominating position after d5, but failed to respond to c5 after it was announced (with Rc8)... But I also gave possible continuations given that c5 had occurred. Sometimes we disagreed in our assessments, so I pointed that out also.
I also generated your report with ChessRx (based on all of your rated games): sites.google.com/view/patrick-coulombe-phd/chess-analytics/chessrx/soothingdisturbance
Let me know your thoughts :)
This game was quite the challenge to analyze, but I tried to give advice and feedback where I could, and I pinpointed some improvements regarding your attack on the queenside (and possible miss in the center). I think you had a dominating position after d5, but failed to respond to c5 after it was announced (with Rc8)... But I also gave possible continuations given that c5 had occurred. Sometimes we disagreed in our assessments, so I pointed that out also.
I also generated your report with ChessRx (based on all of your rated games): sites.google.com/view/patrick-coulombe-phd/chess-analytics/chessrx/soothingdisturbance
Let me know your thoughts :)
So I think I've got a bit of a weird game for you I played while logged off.
So in this game I was black, realized 7...Nc5 was wrong as soon as I did it and should've gone 7...Bxd2 (it was 12:30 am when I played this game so cut me some slack lol), and was wondering if I could get some insight please.
So in this game I was black, realized 7...Nc5 was wrong as soon as I did it and should've gone 7...Bxd2 (it was 12:30 am when I played this game so cut me some slack lol), and was wondering if I could get some insight please.
Razor sharp Trompowsky Attack victory, would love to see you analyze this game of mine
@Toyosi Here's my analysis to your game: lichess.org/study/VmYBT9sl/burQxi2r
I hope this helps. This was a super interesting game, because by the looks of it you should have lost before the endgame, and in the endgame at best you should have drawn, but you really came back skillfully. I gave feedback and advice at several spots, I hope you find it useful. I think something that could really help your game is thinking about pawns and pawn structures (e.g. their low value and how "disposable" they can be, the pawn structures and how it relates to pieces like bishops, etc.)
Also the diagnosis from ChessRx (based on all your rated games) is here: sites.google.com/view/patrick-coulombe-phd/chess-analytics/chessrx/toyosi
Thanks again for sharing your game
I hope this helps. This was a super interesting game, because by the looks of it you should have lost before the endgame, and in the endgame at best you should have drawn, but you really came back skillfully. I gave feedback and advice at several spots, I hope you find it useful. I think something that could really help your game is thinking about pawns and pawn structures (e.g. their low value and how "disposable" they can be, the pawn structures and how it relates to pieces like bishops, etc.)
Also the diagnosis from ChessRx (based on all your rated games) is here: sites.google.com/view/patrick-coulombe-phd/chess-analytics/chessrx/toyosi
Thanks again for sharing your game
`Here's à game I played OTB :
I would welcome your comments, especially before 25... Qc6??
Thank you for your work.
I would welcome your comments, especially before 25... Qc6??
Thank you for your work.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.