Banned Or found & Justice served heh'
@fgermuth said in #10:
> The anti-cheating tool is highly sophisticated and works with probability.
>
> So dont worry about it, if you are not cheating you wont get banned :)
Recently someone Untitled was banned for beating Carlsen in a bullet game. Prior to that event he beat Howell and some other GMs but only after beating Carlsen he was suddenly a cheater...
> The anti-cheating tool is highly sophisticated and works with probability.
>
> So dont worry about it, if you are not cheating you wont get banned :)
Recently someone Untitled was banned for beating Carlsen in a bullet game. Prior to that event he beat Howell and some other GMs but only after beating Carlsen he was suddenly a cheater...
#12 that player was banned not because he defeated Magnus Carlsen in bullet. He was observed while he beat Howell and some other GMs, but after the game with Carlsen, there was sufficient evidence against him for cheating (in some form).
You don’t see your whole digital fingerprint, do you? It is a bit more than blunders and inaccuracies
They probably see your other games
@Derrick1Rose
Cheat detection system is very strong at Lichess.
They check games on request through report.
Are you saying that you cheated?
What do you want to show.
Don't question cheat detection.
You are not banned because you don't cheat.
Cheat detection system is very strong at Lichess.
They check games on request through report.
Are you saying that you cheated?
What do you want to show.
Don't question cheat detection.
You are not banned because you don't cheat.
@mrbasso said in #12:
> Recently someone Untitled was banned for beating Carlsen in a bullet game. Prior to that event he beat Howell and some other GMs but only after beating Carlsen he was suddenly a cheater...
Ok. And how is this related to the fact that the anti-cheating tool is sophisticated and based on statistics ?
On the podcast of perpetual chess there is an interview about a person who works on this.
Could shed some light on this topic if your are interested. But you have to find the episode on your own though^^ I am too lazy^^
> Recently someone Untitled was banned for beating Carlsen in a bullet game. Prior to that event he beat Howell and some other GMs but only after beating Carlsen he was suddenly a cheater...
Ok. And how is this related to the fact that the anti-cheating tool is sophisticated and based on statistics ?
On the podcast of perpetual chess there is an interview about a person who works on this.
Could shed some light on this topic if your are interested. But you have to find the episode on your own though^^ I am too lazy^^
@Derrick1Rose said in #1:
> This is a compilation of the 0 blunders 0 mistakes game ive played recently. Since im not banned yet, how does lichess (irwin ai) know that I wasnt using an engine? Was there something that made it unlikely that I cheated? Also dont ask me why these games are all black i have no clue why it is.
Lichess has like a feature that auto-checks if you use analysis on the side, or if you use an engine. It'll know if you use an engine
> This is a compilation of the 0 blunders 0 mistakes game ive played recently. Since im not banned yet, how does lichess (irwin ai) know that I wasnt using an engine? Was there something that made it unlikely that I cheated? Also dont ask me why these games are all black i have no clue why it is.
Lichess has like a feature that auto-checks if you use analysis on the side, or if you use an engine. It'll know if you use an engine
Because it’s intelligent.
@ThunderClap said in #7:
> I believe there is a penalty for cheating no ? What if you were to be found ?
i wasnt cheating, these are the games that may look like i was cheating. I was wondering how lichess knows i didnt cheat
> I believe there is a penalty for cheating no ? What if you were to be found ?
i wasnt cheating, these are the games that may look like i was cheating. I was wondering how lichess knows i didnt cheat
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.