@Brian-E said in #10:
"... spend a lot of time trying to find a way out of the mess. There is no point in playing a quick move which obviously loses. In many positions which look hopeless there can be a surprising saving resource if we can find it. "
No. The guy in a difficult position might take some time to think, sure. But it is not the preeminent occurrence.. In this case he plays before the end.
Additionally, we often see "your opponent has disconnected. you can claim victory in... seconds."
The simple reality is that, like kids, they are angry and don't play anymore. They do not admit defeat, and eventually take revenge for what they lost. “ Ah, you'e winning over me? It’s unbearable for me. Well, you’ll wait.”
We also experience this in everyday encounters. The guy doesn't shake hands, doesn't bed his king. Sometimes, I've experienced it, he gets up, knocks over the pieces, pulls down his pants and shows his ass. It's just ordinary and so frequent,
vanity.
@mkubecek said in #9:
> So a group of 5/10 people (or one with multiple accounts) would be able to kick anyone out of the web on a whim? A great improvement, indeed.
I went in the wrong direction.
In fact, as Lichess does i guess, just consider not the number of times a sore loser has been blocked, but simply the number of times they have received a "warning, x, letting time pass instead of resign etc" message.
And like that your whole argument about the risk of someone being blocked for the wrong reasons, by a group of mysterious people hungry for his loss, falls apart.