lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
0.0
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d40.0d5+0.12c40.0dxc4+0.43e40.0b5?!+0.6Inaccuracy. Nf6 was best.3...Nf64.e5Nd5[...]4a4+0.5c6+0.95axb5+0.5cxb5+0.76Nc3+0.8a6+0.97Nxb5+0.7axb5+0.88Rxa8+0.5Bb7+0.79Ra1+1.0e6+0.710Nf3+0.4Nf6+0.411Be2+0.2Nxe4+0.112O-O+0.3Bd6+0.313b3+0.3Qc7+0.714bxc4+0.5bxc4?+2.2Mistake. Nc3 was best.14...Nc315.Qe1Nxe2+[...]15Qa4++2.5Bc6+2.716Qxc4+2.7O-O+2.517Ba3+2.7Nd7?!+3.8Inaccuracy. Bxa3 was best.17...Bxa318.Rxa318Rfc1+4.0Rc8+4.419Bxd6+4.6Nxd6+4.520Qc2?!+3.5...Inaccuracy. Qb4 was best.20.Qb420...Nb8?!+5.1Inaccuracy. Qd8 was best.20...Qd821.Qd221Ne5+4.8f6?!+7.1Inaccuracy. Qd8 was best.21...Qd822.Qd322Nxc6+7.0Qxc6+7.723Qxc6?!+5.5...Inaccuracy. Qb2 was best.23.Qb2Qd724.Rxc8+[...]23...Nxc6+5.424Ra6?+3.4...Mistake. Ba6 was best.24.Ba6Rc725.Bd3[...]24...Nxd4+3.525Rxc8++3.0Nxc8+3.826Bh5+3.3g6+3.427Ra8?!+2.1...Inaccuracy. Bxg6 was best.27.Bxg6hxg627...gxh5+2.028Rxc8++1.6Kf7+2.029Rc7++2.1Kg6+1.630g3?+0.3...Mistake. Rc4 was best.30.Rc4e531.h4[...]30...e5?+1.9Mistake. h4 was best.30...h431Kg2?!+0.8...Inaccuracy. h4 was best.31.h4Nf532.Kf1[...]31...h6?+2.1Mistake. h4 was best.31...h432Rd7?+0.6...Mistake. h4 was best.32.h4Ne633.Ra7[...]32...Kf5?+2.4Mistake. h4 was best.32...h433.gxh4Kf5[...]33f4??+0.6...Blunder. h4 was best.33.h4Kg634.Kf1[...]33...Kg6??+3.0Blunder. h4 was best.33...h434.fxe5fxe5[...]34fxe5+3.7fxe5+4.235Rd6++4.5Kg5?!+6.9Inaccuracy. Kg7 was best.35...Kg736h4++7.3Kf5+7.037Rxh6+7.4e4+7.638Rxh5++6.7Ke6+7.639Kf2+7.3Kf6+7.940Ke3+9.7Nf5++59.441Kf4+9.0Ng7+8.042Rh6++64.4Kf7+46.143Kxe4+31.3Kg8+73.044Ke5#14Kf7+88.545g4#12Ne8#1646h5#11Kg7#1447Ra6#7Kf7#748Ra7+#7Kf8#649h6#5Kg8#550Ra8#6Kf7#651Rxe8#7Kxe8#752h7#6Kf7#453h8=Q#3Ke7#354Qg7+#2Ke8#255Ke6#1
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/dl01ybI6"] [Date "2021.02.17"] [White "walfie"] [Black "passedpawn22"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "dl01ybI6"] [UTCDate "2021.02.17"] [UTCTime "19:01:40"] [WhiteElo "1638"] [BlackElo "1680"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+21"] [BlackRatingDiff "-23"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "D20"] [Opening "Queen's Gambit Accepted: Central Variation, Greco Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. e4 b5?! { (0.01 → 0.60) Inaccuracy. Nf6 was best. } { D20 Queen's Gambit Accepted: Central Variation, Greco Variation } (3... Nf6 4. e5 Nd5 5. Bxc4 Nc6 6. Nc3 Nb6 7. Bb5 Bd7 8. Nf3) 4. a4 c6 5. axb5 cxb5 6. Nc3 a6 7. Nxb5 axb5 8. Rxa8 Bb7 9. Ra1 e6 10. Nf3 Nf6 11. Be2 Nxe4 12. O-O Bd6 13. b3 Qc7 14. bxc4 bxc4? { (0.54 → 2.22) Mistake. Nc3 was best. } (14... Nc3 15. Qe1 Nxe2+ 16. Qxe2 bxc4 17. Ba3 O-O 18. Bxd6 Qxd6 19. Rfc1 Bd5 20. Ne5 Nc6 21. Nxc4) 15. Qa4+ Bc6 16. Qxc4 O-O 17. Ba3 Nd7?! { (2.71 → 3.79) Inaccuracy. Bxa3 was best. } (17... Bxa3 18. Rxa3) 18. Rfc1 Rc8 19. Bxd6 Nxd6 20. Qc2?! { (4.52 → 3.49) Inaccuracy. Qb4 was best. } (20. Qb4) 20... Nb8?! { (3.49 → 5.12) Inaccuracy. Qd8 was best. } (20... Qd8 21. Qd2) 21. Ne5 f6?! { (4.78 → 7.14) Inaccuracy. Qd8 was best. } (21... Qd8 22. Qd3) 22. Nxc6 Qxc6 23. Qxc6?! { (7.66 → 5.50) Inaccuracy. Qb2 was best. } (23. Qb2 Qd7 24. Rxc8+ Qxc8 25. Ra8 Nd7 26. Rxc8+ Nxc8 27. Qb7 Ndb6 28. Bc4 Nxc4 29. Qxc8+ Kf7) 23... Nxc6 24. Ra6? { (5.41 → 3.41) Mistake. Ba6 was best. } (24. Ba6 Rc7 25. Bd3 Nc8 26. Be4 N8e7 27. Ra6 Rd7 28. Bxc6 Nxc6 29. Rcxc6 Rxd4 30. Kf1 Rd7) 24... Nxd4 25. Rxc8+ Nxc8 26. Bh5 g6 27. Ra8?! { (3.44 → 2.06) Inaccuracy. Bxg6 was best. } (27. Bxg6 hxg6) 27... gxh5 28. Rxc8+ Kf7 29. Rc7+ Kg6 30. g3? { (1.58 → 0.30) Mistake. Rc4 was best. } (30. Rc4 e5 31. h4 Nf5 32. g3 Nd4 33. Kg2 h6 34. Ra4 Nc6 35. Ra1 Nd4 36. Ra7 Kf5) 30... e5? { (0.30 → 1.89) Mistake. h4 was best. } (30... h4) 31. Kg2?! { (1.89 → 0.75) Inaccuracy. h4 was best. } (31. h4 Nf5 32. Kf1 Nd4 33. Rd7 Nf5 34. Ke2 Nd4+ 35. Ke3 Nf5+ 36. Ke4 Nh6 37. Rb7 Nf5) 31... h6? { (0.75 → 2.12) Mistake. h4 was best. } (31... h4) 32. Rd7? { (2.12 → 0.64) Mistake. h4 was best. } (32. h4 Ne6 33. Ra7 Nd4 34. Rd7 Kf5 35. Rg7 Ne6 36. Rg8 Nd4 37. Kf1 Ne6 38. Ke2 Nd4+) 32... Kf5? { (0.64 → 2.38) Mistake. h4 was best. } (32... h4 33. gxh4 Kf5 34. Rg7 h5 35. Rg8 Ne6 36. Kf3 Nd4+ 37. Ke3 Ne6 38. Ra8 Kg4 39. Ra6) 33. f4?? { (2.38 → 0.58) Blunder. h4 was best. } (33. h4 Kg6 34. Kf1 Ne6 35. Ke2 Kf5 36. Rh7 Kg6 37. Rh8 Ng7 38. Rb8 Ne6 39. Ke3 Kf5) 33... Kg6?? { (0.58 → 2.97) Blunder. h4 was best. } (33... h4 34. fxe5 fxe5 35. gxh4 Kf4 36. h5 Nf5 37. Ra7 e4 38. Ra6 Ke3 39. Ra4 Kf4 40. Kf2) 34. fxe5 fxe5 35. Rd6+ Kg5?! { (4.50 → 6.87) Inaccuracy. Kg7 was best. } (35... Kg7) 36. h4+ Kf5 37. Rxh6 e4 38. Rxh5+ Ke6 39. Kf2 Kf6 40. Ke3 Nf5+ 41. Kf4 Ng7 42. Rh6+ Kf7 43. Kxe4 Kg8 44. Ke5 Kf7 45. g4 Ne8 46. h5 Kg7 47. Ra6 Kf7 48. Ra7+ Kf8 49. h6 Kg8 50. Ra8 Kf7 51. Rxe8 Kxe8 52. h7 Kf7 53. h8=Q Ke7 54. Qg7+ Ke8 55. Ke6 { Black resigns. } 1-0
4 Inaccuracies
3 Mistakes
1 Blunder
34 Average centipawn loss
90%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
5 Inaccuracies
4 Mistakes
1 Blunder
44 Average centipawn loss
86%Accuracy
  1. lazerpo Wow this line! I remember Nakamura playing it and Jonathan Schrantz making a video on it
  2. lazerpo But here you should take on e4 I guess
  3. GaliciaD Nakamura playing black?
  4. v906j (10) exciting start
  5. lazerpo @GaliciaD yes, more than once actually!
  6. gavalanche20 Oh wow
  7. lazerpo You can check in the database
  8. gavalanche20 This line is super sharp iirc
  9. gavalanche20 Tempted to go Nc3 here but I don't know if that's too slow
  10. AACtrl 13.b3, finally making some sense! :D
  11. passedpawn22 I missed 17...Bxh2+ if 18.Nxh2 then 18...Nd2
  12. Checkers4life Hmm. Is there enough to win if the queens and a set of rooks are exchanged?
  13. Checkers4life I would try to keep the lsb on
  14. lazerpo Maybe with pawns only on one side of the board the two kinghts are enough if they can coordinate?
  15. AACtrl 26.Bc4? knights are boxed
  16. Checkers4life Yeah maybe going Ra8 is better to get a Knight off
  17. GaliciaD And have a extra pawn
  18. GaliciaD More material IO mean
  19. Checkers4life g6 is mandatory I think
  20. AACtrl 27.Bg4 f5 Ra8 fxg4 Rxc8+ to split the pawns?
  21. checkmate711 Can Bxg6 followed by Ra8 work? Or is that too weak.
  22. Checkers4life I don't know if splitting the pawns helps us advance ours. Might be better just to sac the bishop
  23. Checkers4life We'd have chances of creating a passed H pawn
  24. walfie think I could have won a pawn with Bxg6, but I'd rather ruin their structure
  25. AACtrl sensible
  26. Checkers4life Kh3 and if they don't play Kg6 we get to play Rg2 and gobble up their H pawns
  27. Checkers4life Rg7*
  28. AACtrl don't trade pawns :(
  29. Checkers4life Oh they're going to for it
  30. Checkers4life I think this is a win now
  31. AACtrl yeah it was nicely done
  32. Checkers4life Indeed
  33. Checkers4life I always like to just trade off the rook for the Knight in positions like this. It might not be optimal but it makes things easier imo
  34. Mindworm64 yeah trading rook for knight simplifies things. or at least get the rook away from the black king and out of the way of the pawns
  35. AACtrl you need to know you have to sac one of the pawns
  36. AACtrl i prefer that way, less chance to mess up
  37. Checkers4life just got to make sure you get the opposition, but yeah
  38. Mindworm64 knight dominated now
  39. Mindworm64 well played
  40. Checkers4life Yeah and if the king recaptures there's no stopping the H pawn
  41. Checkers4life gg
  42. passedpawn22 well played Walfie!
  43. passedpawn22 12...Nc6 better, get the knight out. Where else?
  44. walfie Thanks, I think the prep I did was the key factor
  45. AACtrl at what move were you on your own?
  46. walfie 14
  47. AACtrl wow
  48. passedpawn22 Yes I figured you had that better prepped. You knew I'd go for the sac exchange line right?
  49. walfie Black had many moves to play on move 13 but I knew for most of them I reply with b3
  50. passedpawn22 what about 13...Nc3
  51. walfie Yep, from the games you played and the opening database I could tell
  52. walfie Nc3 I would have to play Qc2, I though that is what you'd play
  53. passedpawn22 I wonder if just letting those pawns on the queenside go and develop and attack would be best?
  54. walfie I think you have to protect and push them pawns and force me to sacc a piece back to stop them
  55. walfie Hence my plan was to get rid of them quickly since then you have nothing
  56. lazerpo I think 14... Nc3 so you don't have Qa4+ when you take back on c4
  57. passedpawn22 Yeah you had this well prepped. I was tempted to play a QGD when I saw 1.d4, figuring you prepped this, but I like this line and wanted ..
  58. passedpawn22 to have some fun! good job!
  59. walfie It was definitely fun for me, I usually shy away from these sharp games but I thought this was a good opportunity to go for it
  60. AACtrl how long did you prep?
  61. walfie Also move 10 I knew f3 was the main theoretical move but I saw you'd lost a game in that position...
  62. walfie since you lost i guessed you'd have checked the right moves for that line so I went for something you wouldnt know well
  63. walfie Long as in time wise or move wise?
  64. AACtrl oh, err.. both
  65. walfie probably about an hour in total, I watched a opening vid on the QGA and then drilled this line for a bit
  66. walfie up to move 14
  67. passedpawn22 lol...I was on my own after Nxe4. I didn't prep much for this beforehand.
  68. walfie I mean you wouldnt any way to know id play this, I have about 5 d4 games and non are QGA
  69. walfie So that helps me
  70. passedpawn22 looks like 14.bxc4 was the key mistake
  71. walfie move 30 ish confirms my fear which was id played into a draw
  72. walfie but i think you have only moves to get a draw which arent obvious ones
  73. passedpawn22 and some opening inaccuracies like Bd6. Because I had a poor middlegame. Looks like I could have had a chance in the endgame after 30.g3
  74. passedpawn22 chance to draw, but still not much of a chance, no way I saw that
  75. passedpawn22 exactly, not obvious
  76. walfie I gtg but thanks for the game, gl with the rest
  77. passedpawn22 Last hope was a blunder in the endgame, but clearly a good case of prep