lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2c5+0.32Nf30.0Nc6+0.53d4+0.2cxd4+0.34Nxd4+0.3Nf6+0.35Nc30.0e5+0.16Ndb5+0.3d6+0.37Bg50.0a6+0.38Na3+0.5b5+0.49Nd5+0.4Be7+0.510Bxf6+0.4Bxf6+0.511c4+0.4b4+0.312Nc2+0.4a5+0.313g3+0.2O-O+0.314Bg2+0.3g6+0.215Nxf6++0.1Qxf6+0.216O-O+0.3h5+0.117f4−0.2exf4−0.518e5??−2.3...Blunder. gxf4 was best.18.gxf4Bg418...dxe5−2.619gxf4−3.1exf4−2.920Qf3?!−4.1...Inaccuracy. Qc1 was best.20.Qc120...Bb7?!−2.8Inaccuracy. Ra6 was best.20...Ra621.Qxf421Qxf4−3.0Qxb2−3.222Ne3?−5.5...Mistake. Rf2 was best.22.Rf2Rae823.Bd5[...]22...Nd4−6.023Rae1−7.1Bxg2−6.824Nxg2−7.6Ne2+−7.725Rxe2−6.8Qxe2−7.8
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/bgYQAxGv"] [Date "2021.11.06"] [White "gavalanche20"] [Black "Mackjalek97"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "bgYQAxGv"] [UTCDate "2021.11.06"] [UTCTime "21:05:09"] [WhiteElo "1987"] [BlackElo "1972"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-16"] [BlackRatingDiff "+19"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "B33"] [Opening "Sicilian Defense: Lasker-Pelikan Variation, Sveshnikov Variation, Chelyabinsk Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 e5 6. Ndb5 d6 7. Bg5 a6 8. Na3 b5 9. Nd5 { B33 Sicilian Defense: Lasker-Pelikan Variation, Sveshnikov Variation, Chelyabinsk Variation } Be7 10. Bxf6 Bxf6 11. c4 b4 12. Nc2 a5 13. g3 O-O 14. Bg2 g6 15. Nxf6+ Qxf6 16. O-O h5 17. f4 exf4 18. e5?? { (-0.47 → -2.33) Blunder. gxf4 was best. } (18. gxf4 Bg4) 18... dxe5 19. gxf4 exf4 20. Qf3?! { (-2.92 → -4.09) Inaccuracy. Qc1 was best. } (20. Qc1) 20... Bb7?! { (-4.09 → -2.82) Inaccuracy. Ra6 was best. } (20... Ra6 21. Qxf4) 21. Qxf4 Qxb2 22. Ne3? { (-3.25 → -5.48) Mistake. Rf2 was best. } (22. Rf2 Rae8 23. Bd5 Nd8 24. Bxb7 Nxb7 25. Qc7 Nd8 26. Qxa5 Re4 27. Raf1 Ne6 28. Kh1 Rf4) 22... Nd4 23. Rae1 Bxg2 24. Nxg2 Ne2+ 25. Rxe2 Qxe2 { White resigns. } 0-1
0101
gavalanche20Mackjalek97
02
gavalanche20 −16
1 Inaccuracy
1 Mistake
1 Blunder
39 Average centipawn loss
85%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
Mackjalek97 +19
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
12 Average centipawn loss
96%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Sicilian Defense: Lasker-Pelikan Variation
  1. Lou-E Go Gav!
  2. gavalanche20 (1.e4) Hey Lou-E
  3. gavalanche20 (1.e4) hey qed
  4. gavalanche20 (1...c5) (1.e4) Might be less chatty today, not sure. I have an OTB tournament coming up next week
  5. QEDemonstrandum Hi:)
  6. gavalanche20 (1...c5) So I'll be playing at least the start of this game on a physical board
  7. gavalanche20 (1...c5) Anyways I'm expecting a Svesh
  8. Lou-E Hello!
  9. gavalanche20 (2...Nc6) Okay this isn't fair, I'm gonna play out the opening first, THEN set up the board once he slows down haha
  10. QEDemonstrandum Always like the gavalanche commentary
  11. Lou-E Seems reasonable
  12. Lou-E I've never even thought of doing that before
  13. Lou-E lol *proceeds to blitz out 14 moves of theory*
  14. Mackjalek97 nice to see we're both in prep until at least move 15 lol
  15. QEDemonstrandum Yes they either only play one line and could prepare easily
  16. Mackjalek97 seems like this is out of their prep though
  17. Lou-E Okay so the question is do you give up your lovely d5 knight for the bishop?
  18. Lou-E Answers on a postcard
  19. gavalanche20 (14...g6) Okay g6 is new. Taking is very tempting
  20. gavalanche20 (14...g6) Hey FlyingDog
  21. Lou-E Nx Qx O-O looks reasonable for White...saddled with a pretty bad LSB in that line though, versus Black's LSB which on b7 is quite strong
  22. Lou-E But maybe you can follow up with Ne3
  23. gavalanche20 (14...g6) Okay so in theory taking the bishop takes away Black's bishop pair for little compensation, but then I'd have no knight on d5
  24. gavalanche20 (14...g6) If I went Ne3-d5 then suddenly d4 is weak
  25. gavalanche20 (14...g6) Hey Scribs
  26. FlyingDog Go gavalanche20!
  27. Lou-E Nx Qx O-O Bb7 Ne3 looking for Nd5 would be my plan
  28. Lou-E Hmm yeah true about d4 though
  29. Lou-E Maybe let the DSB live? It's not actually a very good piece on g7 is it?
  30. gavalanche20 (14...g6) Okay, so I think I'm going to take on f6, castle and play against the d5 square
  31. WickidDoc go gav!
  32. gavalanche20 (14...g6) I have a good clamp on d5 so that break is not happening anytime soon, and eventually I want to trade LSBs with h4 and pile up
  33. gavalanche20 (14...g6) on the d-pawn
  34. gavalanche20 (16.O-O) Hey Wickid
  35. gavalanche20 (16.O-O) Hey patalanoc
  36. gavalanche20 (16.O-O) Okay switching between OTB and the comp is hard haha
  37. gavalanche20 (16...h5) h4 feels fine because I want to play Bh3 anyway
  38. Pokemonscribbles (16...h5) Go gav!
  39. gavalanche20 (16...h5) Okay nvm h4 Bg4. So maybe instead f4, so that Bg4 I'm happy to play Bf3, and taking advantage of the queen on the f-file
  40. Mackjalek97 (17) ok finally out of prep. I don't know this move
  41. gavalanche20 (17.f4) Qd5 is an interesting idea which I think threatens fxe5
  42. Lou-E The Sveshnikov is so weird
  43. gavalanche20 (17.f4) Black almost has a neat little trick: ef4 e5 Qe5 Bc6 Qc5+!? but thankfully I have Nd4! there
  44. gavalanche20 (17.f4) Otherwise I can maybe consider f5 to break up the kingside and maybe expose the king along a2-g8
  45. gavalanche20 (17...exf4) Huh, really?
  46. Lou-E Looks dangerous for sure
  47. gavalanche20 (17...exf4) Okay lets see what Mack has in mind
  48. Lou-E I'm interested in what happens if 18. Rxf4 instead of e5
  49. gavalanche20 (18.e5) Alea jacta est
  50. QEDemonstrandum I am afraid mack just missed e5
  51. gavalanche20 (18.e5) (I'm ashamed to admit I had to google that
  52. gavalanche20 (18...dxe5) Bruh
  53. gavalanche20 (18...dxe5) Did I just completely forget this protects the pawn
  54. QEDemonstrandum Lol so did I
  55. QEDemonstrandum Lets go Mack!
  56. gavalanche20 (18...dxe5) This is honestly just embarrassing from me
  57. Lou-E Ne3 -> Nd5 and try to win back the pawn?
  58. Lou-E I'm drawn to Ne3 bcos it's flashy, dunno if it's actually good
  59. gavalanche20 (20.qf3) hey gsn
  60. gavalanche20 (20.Qf3) Hey Qudit
  61. gavalanche20 (20.Qf3) Maybe I can get one pawn back but this is an absolutely rotten position
  62. gavalanche20 (20.Qf3) Caused by frankly an completely embarassing opening blunder
  63. gavalanche20 (20.Qf3) Hey mund
  64. mynameismund lets go go gav!!
  65. mynameismund hi
  66. Gingersquirrelnuts (20.Qf3) Hi Gav.
  67. gavalanche20 (21.Qxf4) What's another pawn amirite
  68. invinci7777 (21.Qxf4) go gav!
  69. gavalanche20 (21.Qxf4) Hey invinci, hey jc
  70. gavalanche20 (21.Qxf4) Time to channel my inner Scribbles then I guess
  71. gavalanche20 (21.Qxf4) Not seeing 18...dxe5 is such a mindbogglingly frustrating calculation error to make
  72. gavalanche20 (21.Qxf4) If Qxb2 the plan is Ne3-d5-f6 and attack
  73. gavalanche20 (21...Qxb2) (21.Qxf4) As far as I can see Ne3 Qd4+ doesn't work because the bishop hangs in the end
  74. Mackjalek97 (22) I think this was the best move, but definitely the trickiest
  75. gavalanche20 (22.Ne3) Nd4 is annoying
  76. snadyc Let's go Mack!
  77. Qudit Go Gav!
  78. gavalanche20 (22.Ne3) Lol Nd4 is just game over actually
  79. snadyc Sicilians just terrify me. How people can rattle off 15 moves of theory like that is beyond me.
  80. invinci7777 (25...Qxe2) e4 c5 Nc3!
  81. Gingersquirrelnuts gg
  82. snadyc Well played!
  83. invinci7777 gg
  84. Mackjalek97 Ah, I thought 20... Ra6 was best, but I then ended up thinking it was worse. I was seeing ghosts
  85. gavalanche20 I'm just upset I completely missed dx5
  86. Mackjalek97 To be honest I did too
  87. Mackjalek97 when you played e5 I thought "....shit"
  88. Lou-E unlucky Gav
  89. Mackjalek97 I spent like 2 minutes calculating before realizing dxe was possible
  90. Lou-E Well played Mack
  91. Mackjalek97 Well played gav!