lichess.org
Donate
30:00
30:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2e5+0.12Nf3+0.2Nc6+0.13Bc4+0.1Bc5+0.24c30.0Nf6+0.15d40.0exd4+0.26e50.0d5+0.17Bb50.0Ne4+0.28cxd4+0.1Bb6−0.19Be30.0O-O+0.110h3?!−0.5...Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best.10.Nc3f511.exf6[...]10...Bf5?!+0.3Inaccuracy. f5 was best.10...f511.exf6Qxf6[...]11O-O+0.3Ne7+0.512Ng5?!−0.6...Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best.12.Nc3f613.Bd3[...]12...Nxg5−0.413Bxg5−0.4h6−0.414Be3−0.8f6−0.715f4−0.7fxe5−0.516fxe5−0.6Be6−0.317g4??−3.5...Blunder. Rxf8+ was best.17.Rxf8+Qxf817...h5??−1.1Blunder. Ng6 was best.17...Ng618Rxf8+−1.7Qxf8−1.819Kg2?−3.5...Mistake. Nc3 was best.19.Nc3Nc619...hxg4−3.920hxg4−4.0Ng6−3.521Bg5?−7.0...Mistake. Nc3 was best.21.Nc3Nxe521...Qb4−6.922Qc2−13.2Nxe5−8.523Nc3−9.9Qxd4−9.624Rh1−21.2Qxg4+−21.825Kf1−21.5Qf3+−22.7
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/a6IMFlnr"] [Date "2021.09.03"] [White "Zubenelgenubi"] [Black "Ginoux"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "a6IMFlnr"] [UTCDate "2021.09.03"] [UTCTime "09:02:27"] [WhiteElo "2124"] [BlackElo "2221"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-11"] [BlackRatingDiff "+7"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "1800+30"] [ECO "C54"] [Opening "Italian Game: Classical Variation, Greco Gambit"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d4 exd4 6. e5 d5 { C54 Italian Game: Classical Variation, Greco Gambit } 7. Bb5 Ne4 8. cxd4 Bb6 9. Be3 O-O 10. h3?! { (0.10 → -0.52) Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best. } (10. Nc3 f5 11. exf6 Rxf6 12. O-O Bg4 13. Be2 Qd6 14. Rc1 Nxc3 15. bxc3 Re8 16. h3 Bh5) 10... Bf5?! { (-0.52 → 0.32) Inaccuracy. f5 was best. } (10... f5 11. exf6 Qxf6 12. Nc3 Ne7 13. Bd3 Bf5 14. O-O c6 15. Ne5 Nd6 16. Na4 Ng6 17. Nxb6) 11. O-O Ne7 12. Ng5?! { (0.47 → -0.58) Inaccuracy. Nc3 was best. } (12. Nc3 f6 13. Bd3 fxe5 14. Bxe4 Bxe4 15. Nxe5 c6 16. Qb3 Bf5 17. Na4 Ng6 18. Nxb6 axb6) 12... Nxg5 13. Bxg5 h6 14. Be3 f6 15. f4 fxe5 16. fxe5 Be6 17. g4?? { (-0.33 → -3.52) Blunder. Rxf8+ was best. } (17. Rxf8+ Qxf8) 17... h5?? { (-3.52 → -1.13) Blunder. Ng6 was best. } (17... Ng6) 18. Rxf8+ Qxf8 19. Kg2? { (-1.82 → -3.51) Mistake. Nc3 was best. } (19. Nc3 Nc6) 19... hxg4 20. hxg4 Ng6 21. Bg5? { (-3.54 → -7.01) Mistake. Nc3 was best. } (21. Nc3 Nxe5) 21... Qb4 22. Qc2 Nxe5 23. Nc3 Qxd4 24. Rh1 Qxg4+ 25. Kf1 Qf3+ { White resigns. } 0-1
½½0101½½01
ZubenelgenubiGinoux
14
Zubenelgenubi −11
2 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
1 Blunder
67 Average centipawn loss
79%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
Ginoux +7
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
29 Average centipawn loss
90%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Italian Game: Classical Variation
  1. Zubenelgenubi (3.Bc4) hoping for d6
  2. Zubenelgenubi (5...exd4) (5.d4) I'll probably mess up soon, and ontv too
  3. Zubenelgenubi (9...O-O) (9.Be3) not at all sure from move 9
  4. Zubenelgenubi (10.h3) hey Futy!
  5. Futyporyt (10.h3) I can't believe you've played 1.e4 :D
  6. Futyporyt (10.h3) Really proud :D
  7. Zubenelgenubi (16...Be6) (16.fxe5) this feels a bit breezy
  8. Zubenelgenubi (21...Qb4) ouch
  9. Futyporyt (21...Qb4) yea that's a downside of not developing your pieces
  10. Zubenelgenubi (22.Qc2) everything loses here of course
  11. Zubenelgenubi (22...Nxe5) that too :)
  12. Zubenelgenubi (25...Qf3+) at least I moven my knight and passed the 25 move mark
  13. Zubenelgenubi g4 was horrible
  14. Zubenelgenubi i got obssesed thi the g4 sq
  15. Zubenelgenubi f5 sry
  16. Futyporyt Big problem was not developing b1 Knight
  17. Zubenelgenubi sure
  18. Zubenelgenubi move 12 was critical
  19. Zubenelgenubi and of course h3 was too sheepish for this variation
  20. Futyporyt It was a moment where a coach should yell at you for moving your pieces for 2nd time instead of developing others ;)
  21. Zubenelgenubi lol
  22. Zubenelgenubi i was trying to make a favourable exchange
  23. Zubenelgenubi but it was neither an exchange nor favourable
  24. Futyporyt Wasn't it better to exchange Nb1 then? :D
  25. Futyporyt hahah exactly :D
  26. Zubenelgenubi ...and Ginoux is a much better player than the other instance you remember
  27. Zubenelgenubi with that horrifying Nf3e5 and back stuff
  28. Zubenelgenubi I haven't played many long games in the Italian, mostly Scotch
  29. Zubenelgenubi and prepped a bit for ...d6, but of course Ginoux didn't fall for that
  30. Futyporyt Yea, Ginoux just knew his lines well and took advatage of g4, not much you could do later I think
  31. Zubenelgenubi yes the more I see g4 the more disgusted I am
  32. Zubenelgenubi trying to be clever
  33. Zubenelgenubi 17...Ng6 staright away or after Rxf1 is also very stong
  34. Futyporyt It doesn't look too bad at 1st sight, but g4 is a such commital move.
  35. Futyporyt You weaken your king's safety forever
  36. Futyporyt But it's ok, we're learning from our mistakes ;)
  37. Zubenelgenubi nah I knew this stuff, just thought I could get away with fixing the kside pawns and then developing the N
  38. Zubenelgenubi for some reason I thought 17.Rxf8 QxR Qd2 Nf5 was terrible, the comp gives a much smaller advantage than I expected
  39. Zubenelgenubi maybe because 19.Bf2 c5 20.dxc5 Bxc5 21.Nc3 might be playable
  40. Zubenelgenubi I only reached Bf2 and thought ok c5 at some point and the a d pawn in my face
  41. Zubenelgenubi anyway got to go bye Futy! thx for the insights ;)
  42. Zubenelgenubi And Ginoux, thx for the game,wp gl with the rest!
  43. Futyporyt I don't see that line you said to be so bad, you both have weak pawns od e5/d5 but that's it :D
  44. Futyporyt Good luck on later games Zubenel :D
  45. Ginoux thx