lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2d5+0.42exd5+0.4Qxd5+0.73Nc3+0.5Qd8+0.74d4+0.6Nf6+0.85Nf3+0.7Bg4+0.76Be2+0.4e6+0.87O-O+0.2c6+0.58Bg5+0.5Nbd7+0.49Ne4+0.2Be7+0.310Qd3??−1.7...Blunder. Nxf6+ was best.10.Nxf6+Nxf611.c3[...]10...Nxe4−1.711Bxe7−2.0Qxe7−1.612Qxe4−1.4Bf5−1.513Qf4−1.5Bxc2−1.414Qc7?!−2.4...Inaccuracy. Rac1 was best.14.Rac1Bg614...Nf6−2.615Qe5−2.8O-O−2.916Rac1−2.7Bg6−2.617Nh4?!−3.8...Inaccuracy. Qc5 was best.17.Qc5Qxc517...Rfd8−3.818Nxg6−3.9hxg6−3.919Rfd1−4.3Rd6?!−3.4Inaccuracy. Rd5 was best.19...Rd520.Qe320Rc3−3.8Rd5−3.921Qe3−3.9Rad8−4.022Bf3−4.5R5d7−4.223Ra3−5.0a6−5.124Rad3−4.9Nd5−5.125Bxd5−5.2Rxd5−5.026Qd2−6.1Qd7−6.427Qb4−6.5e5−6.7
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/ZqXeDdPs"] [Date "2021.08.18"] [White "Thooorin"] [Black "Narski"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "ZqXeDdPs"] [UTCDate "2021.08.18"] [UTCTime "18:01:34"] [WhiteElo "1769"] [BlackElo "1778"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-13"] [BlackRatingDiff "+24"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "B01"] [Opening "Scandinavian Defense: Valencian Variation, Main Line"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qd8 4. d4 Nf6 5. Nf3 Bg4 { B01 Scandinavian Defense: Valencian Variation, Main Line } 6. Be2 e6 7. O-O c6 8. Bg5 Nbd7 9. Ne4 Be7 10. Qd3?? { (0.34 → -1.74) Blunder. Nxf6+ was best. } (10. Nxf6+ Nxf6 11. c3 O-O 12. a4 a5 13. Ne5 Bxe2 14. Qxe2 Nd7 15. Bf4 Nxe5 16. Bxe5 Bd6) 10... Nxe4 11. Bxe7 Qxe7 12. Qxe4 Bf5 13. Qf4 Bxc2 14. Qc7?! { (-1.44 → -2.43) Inaccuracy. Rac1 was best. } (14. Rac1 Bg6) 14... Nf6 15. Qe5 O-O 16. Rac1 Bg6 17. Nh4?! { (-2.62 → -3.83) Inaccuracy. Qc5 was best. } (17. Qc5 Qxc5) 17... Rfd8 18. Nxg6 hxg6 19. Rfd1 Rd6?! { (-4.30 → -3.37) Inaccuracy. Rd5 was best. } (19... Rd5 20. Qe3) 20. Rc3 Rd5 21. Qe3 Rad8 22. Bf3 R5d7 23. Ra3 a6 24. Rad3 Nd5 25. Bxd5 Rxd5 26. Qd2 Qd7 27. Qb4 e5 { White resigns. } 0-1
2 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
37 Average centipawn loss
87%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
14 Average centipawn loss
96%Accuracy
  1. RedzoneNova go Narski !
  2. snorcal Was 19..Rd6 a mouse slip
  3. RedzoneNova maybe there was a nice smelling rose on d6
  4. snorcal (24) Qc5 is a threat now
  5. snorcal I think 23..Qc5 could have worked
  6. snorcal 24..Nd5, Im not a fan of the exchange, the knight was much better than the bishop
  7. snorcal could have tried a Ne8, Nd6, Nb5/Nc4 journey
  8. snorcal 26..e5 may work now?
  9. RedzoneNova maybe Qf6 first
  10. RedzoneNova huh gg
  11. Narski I exchanged the knight for the bishop because of the weak d4 pawn
  12. Narski although I don't know what I would have done had he played 26.Kf1 and 27 Ke2
  13. snorcal The d4 pawn is fixed on a dark square
  14. snorcal so the LSB cannot protect it
  15. snorcal but the knight can pressure it
  16. snorcal so you can get one more attacker than they can defend
  17. Narski Yes, but to attack a dark square you have to go to a light square
  18. Narski I was gonna manoeuvre the knight to f5 had he not taken it. And I was fine with him taking it, because then the bishop can't defend
  19. Narski the rook
  20. Narski which made 27.e5 possible