lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2e5+0.22Nf3+0.3Nc6+0.23Bc4+0.1Bc5+0.24c30.0Nf6+0.15d3+0.1Bb6+0.36O-O+0.3O-O+0.57Re1+0.4Ng4+0.88Re2+0.4d6+0.49h3+0.3Nf6+0.410Bg5?!−0.3...Inaccuracy. a4 was best.10.a4Nh510...h6−0.211Bh4?−1.7...Mistake. Be3 was best.11.Be3d511...Be6?−0.1Mistake. g5 was best.11...g512.Bg312Nbd2+0.1g5+0.113Bg3?!−0.7...Inaccuracy. Bxe6 was best.13.Bxe6fxe614.Bg3[...]13...Nh5−0.714Bh2−0.8Nf4??+1.0Blunder. g4 was best.14...g415.hxg415Bxf4+1.4gxf4+2.016Bxe6+1.9fxe6+1.917Qb3?!+1.0...Inaccuracy. Nc4 was best.17.Nc4Kh817...Qf6+1.218Nc4+1.0Kh7+1.419a4+1.0Rg8+1.520Kh1+1.5Rad8?!+2.1Inaccuracy. Rg7 was best.20...Rg721.Rg121Rg1+2.0d5+2.622Nxb6?+1.1...Mistake. exd5 was best.22.exd5exd522...axb6+1.123Qc2+1.0Rg7??+3.2Blunder. d4 was best.23...d424.Ree1Rg7[...]24exd5?+1.4...Mistake. d4 was best.24.d4Kg824...exd5+1.225b4+1.3Rdg8??+4.6Blunder. Re8 was best.25...Re826.b5Nb8[...]26b5+4.9Qf5+4.827Kh2+5.0Ne7+5.128Rxe5+5.3Qf6+5.529d4++4.8Kh8+5.030Qe2+5.5c6+7.231Re6+7.2Qf7+8.032Rxh6++8.1Rh7+7.833Qe5++7.6Rg7+10.034Rxh7++8.5Kxh7+8.535Ng5++8.4Rxg5+8.636Qxg5+8.6
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/Y68WwfhR"] [Date "2021.06.01"] [White "y3LL3r"] [Black "NLance"] [Result "1-0"] [UTCDate "2021.06.01"] [UTCTime "11:59:57"] [WhiteElo "2022"] [BlackElo "2023"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+6"] [BlackRatingDiff "-8"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "C54"] [Opening "Italian Game: Classical Variation, Giuoco Pianissimo"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. c3 Nf6 5. d3 { C54 Italian Game: Classical Variation, Giuoco Pianissimo } Bb6 6. O-O O-O 7. Re1 Ng4 8. Re2 d6 9. h3 Nf6 10. Bg5?! { (0.36 → -0.28) Inaccuracy. a4 was best. } (10. a4 Nh5) 10... h6 11. Bh4? { (-0.21 → -1.71) Mistake. Be3 was best. } (11. Be3 d5) 11... Be6? { (-1.71 → -0.08) Mistake. g5 was best. } (11... g5 12. Bg3) 12. Nbd2 g5 13. Bg3?! { (0.13 → -0.69) Inaccuracy. Bxe6 was best. } (13. Bxe6 fxe6 14. Bg3 Nh5 15. Bh2 a6 16. Re1 Qd7 17. d4 exd4 18. Nc4 Ba7 19. cxd4 Nf4) 13... Nh5 14. Bh2 Nf4?? { (-0.81 → 1.00) Blunder. g4 was best. } (14... g4 15. hxg4) 15. Bxf4 gxf4 16. Bxe6 fxe6 17. Qb3?! { (1.90 → 0.96) Inaccuracy. Nc4 was best. } (17. Nc4 Kh8) 17... Qf6 18. Nc4 Kh7 19. a4 Rg8 20. Kh1 Rad8?! { (1.49 → 2.10) Inaccuracy. Rg7 was best. } (20... Rg7 21. Rg1) 21. Rg1 d5 22. Nxb6? { (2.55 → 1.07) Mistake. exd5 was best. } (22. exd5 exd5) 22... axb6 23. Qc2 Rg7?? { (0.99 → 3.15) Blunder. d4 was best. } (23... d4 24. Ree1 Rg7 25. Qe2 Rdg8 26. Kh2 Ra8 27. Qd1 Qe7 28. Qc2 Qc5 29. Rc1 Rd8 30. Qe2) 24. exd5? { (3.15 → 1.36) Mistake. d4 was best. } (24. d4 Kg8) 24... exd5 25. b4 Rdg8?? { (1.34 → 4.62) Blunder. Re8 was best. } (25... Re8 26. b5 Nb8 27. c4 c6 28. Qb3 Nd7 29. cxd5 Qf7 30. Rge1 Qg6 31. Nh4 Qg5 32. bxc6) 26. b5 Qf5 27. Kh2 Ne7 28. Rxe5 Qf6 29. d4+ Kh8 30. Qe2 c6 31. Re6 Qf7 32. Rxh6+ Rh7 33. Qe5+ Rg7 34. Rxh7+ Kxh7 35. Ng5+ Rxg5 36. Qxg5 { Black resigns. } 1-0
3 inaccuracies
3 mistakes
0 blunders
32 Average centipawn loss
90%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
1 inaccuracy
1 mistake
3 blunders
52 Average centipawn loss
84%Accuracy
  1. y3LL3r so clearly he wants to mate me. I think Rg8 Kh1 Qg6 Rg1 would defend. I hope I didnt overstep and should have moved that one move earlier
  2. y3LL3r he might have some rook sacing ideas...
  3. y3LL3r Ive once had a similar position and then blatantly underestimated blacks attack :-S
  4. AACtrl tougher for black without a light square bishop
  5. y3LL3r even thought a5 is tempting I would never be able to take with the rook as he would continue Qg6 and Ne1 f3 loses
  6. y3LL3r so whats his point with Rad8 or is he just thkning I would push a5...
  7. plastic_pusher he's thinking d5
  8. plastic_pusher the f2 P could hang
  9. y3LL3r lets just play it safe...
  10. plastic_pusher take the B
  11. plastic_pusher a4 looks a prob now
  12. NLance D4 must have been better than exD5
  13. y3LL3r ouch miscalcualted this one... I thought there was some tactic after d4+... hmmm
  14. plastic_pusher play faster1
  15. plastic_pusher a weakening move
  16. NLance b5 qf5
  17. NLance I hope this works
  18. plastic_pusher Nh4? is it possible?
  19. NLance the idea is obviously some Rxg2 stuff
  20. NLance just Kh2 though...
  21. plastic_pusher maybe not
  22. plastic_pusher Kh2 first
  23. AACtrl why not bxc6? sorry if stupid
  24. plastic_pusher indeed
  25. plastic_pusher The Q sac looks unconvincing to me
  26. plastic_pusher Th R sac more dangerous
  27. AACtrl oh he gets white knight back, doesn't he?
  28. plastic_pusher R sac fatal. Kh2 was necessary
  29. plastic_pusher this looks better
  30. plastic_pusher qe2
  31. NLance gg
  32. plastic_pusher well done yeller!
  33. y3LL3r Thanks!
  34. plastic_pusher Tough game, with the speed he plays at.
  35. y3LL3r Yeah he played very fast!
  36. y3LL3r And not so correct it appears now
  37. plastic_pusher For a long time he did very well
  38. y3LL3r yes there was pressure definitely
  39. plastic_pusher Tried to hard for the spectacular, should have leant on the Q-side Ps uyou had weakened
  40. y3LL3r yeah I agree. I think he really wanted to checkmate me
  41. plastic_pusher exactly
  42. y3LL3r Then he thought if he would play fast I would have more time trouble
  43. y3LL3r perhaps
  44. y3LL3r Idk just assuming
  45. plastic_pusher the 45
  46. plastic_pusher s incs make a big diff
  47. y3LL3r Ow Lance is still in the analysis
  48. NLance I just have a problem with not thinking
  49. NLance and It's compounded by me being rewarded with wins
  50. plastic_pusher you had so much time. it's the bullet habits that killed you
  51. y3LL3r You had so much time on your hands, I was jealous
  52. y3LL3r I was a bit unprepared for thi Bg5 line, it just appeared out of nowhere but not somehting I ususally play...
  53. y3LL3r You seemed to know it well?
  54. NLance nope
  55. NLance I know what to do in vaguely similar positions to be fair