lichess.org
Donate
30:00
30:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.3
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d4+0.3Nf6+0.22c4+0.3e6+0.23Nc3+0.2Bb4+0.24Qc2+0.1d5+0.25Bg50.0O-O0.06e30.0a6+0.57Bd3+0.2h6+0.48h4?!−0.2...Inaccuracy. Bxf6 was best.8.Bxf6Qxf69.cxd5[...]8...dxc4−0.39Bh7+−0.8Kh8−0.710Bxf6−0.9Qxf6−0.811Be4−1.0Nd7−0.912Nf3−1.0Rb8−1.113g4−1.1b5−0.614g5−0.7Qe7−0.815gxh6−0.7g6?+0.8Mistake. gxh6 was best.15...gxh616.Rg116Rg1+0.6Bb7?!+1.3Inaccuracy. Qf6 was best.16...Qf617.Ke2c5[...]17Ng5?0.0...Mistake. Bxb7 was best.17.Bxb717...Bxe4−0.118Nxe4?−1.3...Mistake. Qxe4 was best.18.Qxe4Nf619.Qc2[...]18...Qxh4−1.119Ke2?!−2.2...Inaccuracy. O-O-O was best.19.O-O-OBxc319...Qe7?−0.7Mistake. e5 was best.19...e520.d5f5[...]20Ng5−0.9Rbd8−0.521a3?!−1.0...Inaccuracy. Rad1 was best.21.Rad1Nf621...Ba5?!−0.4Inaccuracy. Bxc3 was best.21...Bxc322.bxc322Qe4?−1.7...Mistake. a4 was best.22.a4b422...Nf6−1.523Qh4−1.5c5?!−0.5Inaccuracy. e5 was best.23...e524.dxe524Nge4??−2.3...Blunder. Nf3 was best.24.Nf3cxd424...Nd5??+0.5Blunder. cxd4 was best.24...cxd425.Nxb5axb5[...]25Qxe7+0.3Nxe7+0.526Nxc5+0.5Ra8+1.027N3e4+0.8Bb6??+3.3Blunder. Ra7 was best.27...Ra728.Rh128Nd7+3.0Bxd4?+4.9Mistake. Nd5 was best.28...Nd529.Nxf829exd4+4.8Rfd8+5.130Nef6?+3.0...Mistake. Ne5 was best.30.Ne530...Nd5+3.431Nxd5+3.4Rxd7?+5.5Mistake. exd5 was best.31...exd532.Ne532Nb6+5.4
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/WT4Dk1m0"] [Date "2017.01.26"] [White "AFWF_Erick"] [Black "tnan123"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "WT4Dk1m0"] [UTCDate "2017.01.26"] [UTCTime "01:56:19"] [WhiteElo "1573"] [BlackElo "1767"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+17"] [BlackRatingDiff "-16"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "1800+30"] [ECO "E34"] [Opening "Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Qc2 d5 { E34 Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Noa Variation } 5. Bg5 O-O 6. e3 a6 7. Bd3 h6 8. h4?! { (0.35 → -0.21) Inaccuracy. Bxf6 was best. } (8. Bxf6 Qxf6 9. cxd5 exd5 10. a3 Bxc3+ 11. Qxc3 Nc6 12. Ne2 Re8 13. Qc2 Bg4 14. O-O Bxe2) 8... dxc4 9. Bh7+ Kh8 10. Bxf6 Qxf6 11. Be4 Nd7 12. Nf3 Rb8 13. g4 b5 14. g5 Qe7 15. gxh6 g6? { (-0.73 → 0.77) Mistake. gxh6 was best. } (15... gxh6 16. Rg1) 16. Rg1 Bb7?! { (0.63 → 1.28) Inaccuracy. Qf6 was best. } (16... Qf6 17. Ke2 c5 18. a3 Ba5 19. h5 g5 20. Rxg5 Qxh6 21. dxc5 f6 22. Rg6 Qxh5 23. Rag1) 17. Ng5? { (1.28 → -0.02) Mistake. Bxb7 was best. } (17. Bxb7) 17... Bxe4 18. Nxe4? { (-0.14 → -1.34) Mistake. Qxe4 was best. } (18. Qxe4 Nf6 19. Qc2 Bxc3+ 20. bxc3 c5 21. Rd1 cxd4 22. Rxd4 e5 23. Rd1 Rfd8 24. Kf1 a5) 18... Qxh4 19. Ke2?! { (-1.10 → -2.19) Inaccuracy. O-O-O was best. } (19. O-O-O Bxc3) 19... Qe7? { (-2.19 → -0.74) Mistake. e5 was best. } (19... e5 20. d5 f5 21. Ng5 Qh5+ 22. Kf1 f4 23. e4 Qxh6 24. a4 Be7 25. Nf3 Nc5 26. Ke2) 20. Ng5 Rbd8 21. a3?! { (-0.46 → -1.05) Inaccuracy. Rad1 was best. } (21. Rad1 Nf6) 21... Ba5?! { (-1.05 → -0.40) Inaccuracy. Bxc3 was best. } (21... Bxc3 22. bxc3) 22. Qe4? { (-0.40 → -1.71) Mistake. a4 was best. } (22. a4 b4) 22... Nf6 23. Qh4 c5?! { (-1.50 → -0.53) Inaccuracy. e5 was best. } (23... e5 24. dxe5) 24. Nge4?? { (-0.53 → -2.35) Blunder. Nf3 was best. } (24. Nf3 cxd4) 24... Nd5?? { (-2.35 → 0.49) Blunder. cxd4 was best. } (24... cxd4 25. Nxb5 axb5 26. Qxf6+ Qxf6 27. Nxf6 dxe3 28. Rgd1 Rxd1 29. Rxd1 exf2 30. Rd7 Bb6 31. Ng4) 25. Qxe7 Nxe7 26. Nxc5 Ra8 27. N3e4 Bb6?? { (0.81 → 3.27) Blunder. Ra7 was best. } (27... Ra7 28. Rh1) 28. Nd7 Bxd4? { (2.97 → 4.91) Mistake. Nd5 was best. } (28... Nd5 29. Nxf8) 29. exd4 Rfd8 30. Nef6? { (5.12 → 3.00) Mistake. Ne5 was best. } (30. Ne5) 30... Nd5 31. Nxd5 Rxd7? { (3.39 → 5.52) Mistake. exd5 was best. } (31... exd5 32. Ne5) 32. Nb6 { Black resigns. } 1-0
10
AFWF_Ericktnan123
10
AFWF_Erick +17
3 Inaccuracies
4 Mistakes
1 Blunder
41 Average centipawn loss
85%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
tnan123 −16
3 Inaccuracies
4 Mistakes
2 Blunders
60 Average centipawn loss
78%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation
  1. tnan123 hi!
  2. tnan123 well played
  3. AFWF_Erick Thanks! It was way more complicated than I thought it was ever going to be
  4. tnan123 i just missed so many things towards the end there
  5. AFWF_Erick Yeah. Otherwise I think you did a great job at equalizing
  6. tnan123 i was feeling a lot of pressure around move 8 or 9
  7. AFWF_Erick You did an annoyingly great job at neutralizing my threats lol
  8. tnan123 8. h4 was a nice move
  9. AFWF_Erick yeah Bg4 I was either going to sac it for the h7 pawn but I saw h4 and then it made it really interesting
  10. AFWF_Erick Bg5*
  11. tnan123 i was thinking you'd sac one of your bishops a few times there
  12. AFWF_Erick It took a lot for me to stop myself
  13. tnan123 after i played g6 i was scared you'd play h5
  14. AFWF_Erick it says g6 was a mistake but I really like that and admit I over looked it
  15. tnan123 but i guess Rg1 was better
  16. AFWF_Erick if h5 you have g5 I think
  17. tnan123 gxh6 makes my king feel so weak i wanted to keep things closed
  18. AFWF_Erick Yeah I probably would have done the same
  19. tnan123 i never saw 24. Nge4 either
  20. tnan123 24... cxd4 wow
  21. AFWF_Erick Apparently that was a mistake
  22. AFWF_Erick I didn't think you could play 24 ... cxd4 but apparently that's best
  23. AFWF_Erick I wonder who would have saw that
  24. AFWF_Erick I guess the tempo on my knight?
  25. AFWF_Erick makes it good
  26. AFWF_Erick This was a wild game
  27. tnan123 yea
  28. AFWF_Erick Anyway I have to head out of here
  29. tnan123 ok
  30. AFWF_Erick Thanks for the game!
  31. tnan123 yup thanks :)