lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.3
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d4+0.3g6+0.72c4+0.5Bg7+0.53Nc3+0.7Nf6+0.44e4+0.6O-O+0.75Bd3+0.3d6+0.46h3+0.3Na6?!+0.9Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best.6...Nc67.d5Ne5[...]7a3+0.5c5+0.78d5+0.4Nc7+0.89Be3+0.3Bd7?!+0.9Inaccuracy. b5 was best.9...b510.Nf310Nge2+1.0Rb8+1.411b4+1.3b5+1.412bxc5+1.5dxc5+1.813Bxc5?+0.2...Mistake. O-O was best.13.O-Obxc414.Bxc4[...]13...bxc4+0.414Bxc4+0.7Nb5+0.615Rb1??−5.3...Blunder. Bxb5 was best.15.Bxb5Bxb515...Qc7??−0.4Blunder. Nxc3 was best.15...Nxc316.Rxb816Bxb5−0.4Qxc50.017a4−0.2Bxb5−0.318Rxb5?!−1.1...Inaccuracy. axb5 was best.18.axb5Qc419.Qb3[...]18...Rxb5−0.919axb5−0.9Nd7?!−0.1Inaccuracy. Qc4 was best.19...Qc420Qb3−0.2Rc80.021Na4??−3.8...Blunder. O-O was best.21.O-OQc422.Qxc4[...]21...Qc4−3.822Qa2??−24.5...Blunder. Qxc4 was best.22.Qxc4Rxc422...Qxa2−23.7
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/V0DXIiq6"] [Date "2020.05.09"] [White "val1313"] [Black "jaak3l"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "V0DXIiq6"] [UTCDate "2020.05.09"] [UTCTime "13:02:25"] [WhiteElo "1914"] [BlackElo "1940"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-13"] [BlackRatingDiff "+16"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "E70"] [Opening "King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 g6 2. c4 Bg7 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. e4 { E70 King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation } O-O 5. Bd3 d6 6. h3 Na6?! { (0.33 → 0.89) Inaccuracy. Nc6 was best. } (6... Nc6 7. d5 Ne5 8. Nf3 Nxf3+ 9. Qxf3 e6 10. Bg5 h6 11. Be3) 7. a3 c5 8. d5 Nc7 9. Be3 Bd7?! { (0.29 → 0.85) Inaccuracy. b5 was best. } (9... b5 10. Nf3) 10. Nge2 Rb8 11. b4 b5 12. bxc5 dxc5 13. Bxc5? { (1.80 → 0.21) Mistake. O-O was best. } (13. O-O bxc4 14. Bxc4 Bb5 15. Qd3 Bxc4 16. Qxc4 Nd7 17. Rfb1 Ne8 18. Qa4 Nd6 19. Rxb8 Nxb8) 13... bxc4 14. Bxc4 Nb5 15. Rb1?? { (0.62 → -5.30) Blunder. Bxb5 was best. } (15. Bxb5 Bxb5) 15... Qc7?? { (-5.30 → -0.43) Blunder. Nxc3 was best. } (15... Nxc3 16. Rxb8) 16. Bxb5 Qxc5 17. a4 Bxb5 18. Rxb5?! { (-0.34 → -1.14) Inaccuracy. axb5 was best. } (18. axb5 Qc4 19. Qb3 Rfc8 20. Qxc4 Rxc4 21. f3 Nd7 22. Kd2 Nc5 23. Ra1 Bxc3+ 24. Nxc3 Nb3+) 18... Rxb5 19. axb5 Nd7?! { (-0.92 → -0.13) Inaccuracy. Qc4 was best. } (19... Qc4) 20. Qb3 Rc8 21. Na4?? { (0.00 → -3.85) Blunder. O-O was best. } (21. O-O Qc4 22. Qxc4 Rxc4 23. Rc1 Bxc3 24. Nxc3 Nc5 25. f3 Nd3 26. Rc2 Nc5) 21... Qc4 22. Qa2?? { (-3.82 → -24.54) Blunder. Qxc4 was best. } (22. Qxc4 Rxc4) 22... Qxa2 { White resigns. } 0-1
1 Inaccuracy
1 Mistake
3 Blunders
94 Average centipawn loss
64%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
3 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
45 Average centipawn loss
81%Accuracy
  1. Antaniserse 14...Nxe4 probably not worth it, two pieces for the rook, dark squares issues
  2. jonjons yeah
  3. Antaniserse but now white looks like one move away from consolidating a safe extra pawn... i guess Rc1 and everything should be protected
  4. jonjons instead of 13.Bxc5 , 13.e5 looks VERY strong
  5. Antaniserse black knight has awkward retreats, but you also open up the diagonal to the bishop... want to follow with f4 and not 14.Bxc5 right?
  6. jonjons yeah, possibly
  7. jonjons yeah, f4
  8. jonjons because the c5 pawn is not easily defended by balck
  9. jonjons black*
  10. Antaniserse that's a big mean pawn center, i agree
  11. Antaniserse Qc7 or Nxc3 and then Qc7?
  12. jonjons yeah, lots of pieces that black could munch on on the c file
  13. val1313 I wanted to go on A3
  14. val1313 epic missclick
  15. val1313 pretty mad at myself
  16. val1313 It was already very bad though
  17. jonjons gg
  18. jonjons What was Qa2?