lichess.org
Donate
30:00
30:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.3
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.3c5+0.32Nf30.0d60.03Bb5+0.0Bd7+0.14Bxd7++0.2Qxd7+0.25c40.0Nf6+0.26Nc3+0.3Nc6+0.37d4+0.3cxd4+0.48Nxd4+0.5g6+0.59f3+0.3Bg7+0.210Be3+0.3a6+0.311Rc1+0.2Rb8+0.412a4+0.2e60.013O-O+0.1O-O+0.114b3+0.1Rfd8+0.115Re1+0.2d5+0.316cxd5+0.4exd5+0.517e5+0.3Ne8+0.218f4+0.5Bf8+0.319Qf3+0.4Ng7+0.620g4?!0.0...Inaccuracy. Red1 was best.20.Red1Ba321.Rb1[...]20...Bb4+0.421Red1+0.7Rbc8+0.922Bf2??−6.3...Blunder. Nde2 was best.22.Nde2d422...Bxc3−6.523Rxc3−6.8Nxe5−6.524fxe5−6.9Rxc3−7.025Qxc3−8.6Qxg4+−8.526Bg3−8.7Qxd1+−9.027Kg2−8.8Qg4−8.928e6−8.9Nxe6−9.029Nxe6−8.9Qxe6−8.830Be5−10.1d4−11.031Kg3?!#−6...Checkmate is now unavoidable. Qc7 was best.31.Qc7Re8
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/PvGI9dKa"] [Date "2021.10.20"] [White "IsaVulpes"] [Black "andrewbeeksma"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "PvGI9dKa"] [UTCDate "2021.10.20"] [UTCTime "21:05:47"] [WhiteElo "2247"] [BlackElo "2123"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-17"] [BlackRatingDiff "+28"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "1800+30"] [ECO "B52"] [Opening "Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Sokolsky Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bb5+ Bd7 4. Bxd7+ Qxd7 5. c4 { B52 Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Sokolsky Variation } Nf6 6. Nc3 Nc6 7. d4 cxd4 8. Nxd4 g6 9. f3 Bg7 10. Be3 a6 11. Rc1 Rb8 12. a4 e6 13. O-O O-O 14. b3 Rfd8 15. Re1 d5 16. cxd5 exd5 17. e5 Ne8 18. f4 Bf8 19. Qf3 Ng7 20. g4?! { (0.56 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. Red1 was best. } (20. Red1 Ba3 21. Rb1 Ne6 22. Nc2 d4 23. Nxa3 Qe7 24. Ne4 dxe3 25. Nc4 e2 26. Qxe2 Rxd1+) 20... Bb4 21. Red1 Rbc8 22. Bf2?? { (0.86 → -6.35) Blunder. Nde2 was best. } (22. Nde2 d4) 22... Bxc3 23. Rxc3 Nxe5 24. fxe5 Rxc3 25. Qxc3 Qxg4+ 26. Bg3 Qxd1+ 27. Kg2 Qg4 28. e6 Nxe6 29. Nxe6 Qxe6 30. Be5 d4 31. Kg3?! { (-10.97 → Mate in 6) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Qc7 was best. } { White resigns. } (31. Qc7 Re8) 0-1
01
IsaVulpesandrewbeeksma
01
IsaVulpes −17
2 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
41 Average centipawn loss
78%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
andrewbeeksma +28
0 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
7 Average centipawn loss
98%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation
  1. IsaVulpes surprised this surprises them
  2. IsaVulpes its the normal reply to early d5
  3. IsaVulpes no more automatic moves
  4. IsaVulpes qf3 looks like some vague improvement to support eg g4f5 in the future, and defend c3/b3 along the third after Bf2
  5. IsaVulpes ftr my opponent plays the scandi every game and i'm rather annoyed at this
  6. IsaVulpes wanted to give my new rep a practical test
  7. IsaVulpes g4 is always right
  8. IsaVulpes (21) not sure about this vs Rf1
  9. IsaVulpes but I feel like there's no need to go quite that 1000% in yet
  10. IsaVulpes like i think i can play h3 kg2 bf2 type stuff and just be content with space
  11. IsaVulpes down to less than half of my clock again
  12. IsaVulpes i will never learn this
  13. IsaVulpes what
  14. IsaVulpes wow the rook hangs on d1
  15. IsaVulpes maybe g4 wasnt right
  16. IsaVulpes or maybe i should actually have played h3
  17. IsaVulpes am i just resigning
  18. IsaVulpes ah i thought i might have e6 but i'm still just down too much material
  19. Fouracle probably down 2 pawns
  20. Fouracle had to been better than Qxc3
  21. IsaVulpes 3good5me
  22. IsaVulpes useful games these
  23. IsaVulpes wow youre playing the dragon in every game
  24. IsaVulpes what the shit am i going mental
  25. andrewbeeksma I am aha
  26. IsaVulpes who did i prep for
  27. andrewbeeksma havne't played the scandi in a year and a half lol
  28. andrewbeeksma maybe looked at some old games. no slow dragons yet
  29. IsaVulpes no i never look at games older than a year
  30. andrewbeeksma hmm odd
  31. IsaVulpes best guess is that i set the filter to [minimum year old] rather than maximum
  32. IsaVulpes either way insane
  33. andrewbeeksma unlucky
  34. andrewbeeksma would you have played the same line? or go into yugoslav attack?
  35. IsaVulpes no just awful
  36. IsaVulpes no idea what i did here
  37. andrewbeeksma was expecting a yugoslav idk what you would've played though
  38. IsaVulpes i would never play this
  39. IsaVulpes this is my throwaway line that i never look at in case someone tries to surprise me with a sicilian when they have 0 games in the db with it
  40. IsaVulpes i dont play this against actual sicilian players
  41. IsaVulpes not that the opening was a big issue but what a colossal waste overall
  42. IsaVulpes literal zero takeaway from this game
  43. andrewbeeksma on the bright side, I spent over 2 hours of preparation / reviewing and you completely avoided it as well xd
  44. IsaVulpes you wouldnt prep what i actually play in any case
  45. andrewbeeksma yeah, unfortunately an even game until a 1 move blunder. not too much to analyze.
  46. andrewbeeksma fair enough
  47. IsaVulpes unless you decided to prep both 10.Kb1 and 9.g4 in the yugoslav despite me having 1 game in the former and 0 in the latter
  48. andrewbeeksma I did actually. i have anish's course
  49. andrewbeeksma he recommends basically memorizing those 2 chapters (and the yugoslav mainline) before studying anything else
  50. IsaVulpes and you just prepped the entire yugoslav? :F
  51. andrewbeeksma the other lines aren't sharp and can be played otb
  52. andrewbeeksma well there's about 90 lines I looked at, no telling if I would've remembered otb or if you played a deep sideline
  53. IsaVulpes well respects either way then
  54. IsaVulpes i tend to prep the 1 line my opponent is likely to play
  55. IsaVulpes not an entire opening
  56. IsaVulpes whats your otb rating?
  57. andrewbeeksma none yet. played 5 USCF OTB games last month. you?
  58. andrewbeeksma beat a 13, 14, 15, and 1600, then lost to a 2100 because i made a silly blunder
  59. IsaVulpes no idea
  60. IsaVulpes i used to be some 2100 strength but given by my performance in the last yr+ that dropped by about 400 elo
  61. andrewbeeksma that seems like a big drop :o you've been doing well in lonewolf though no?
  62. IsaVulpes no
  63. IsaVulpes been doing atrocious lel
  64. andrewbeeksma ah i saw a gold bar around your name in the standings not sure what it means though
  65. IsaVulpes that means i won the tournament in the past
  66. andrewbeeksma Oh
  67. IsaVulpes my perf after this loss is 2180
  68. IsaVulpes season 19 i had 2450, season 20 it was 2390
  69. IsaVulpes so yeah
  70. IsaVulpes dont think ive had a single game this season with less than 3 blunders
  71. IsaVulpes ok this one because it was over before i could blunder twice more
  72. andrewbeeksma unfortunate
  73. IsaVulpes just bad
  74. IsaVulpes not to take away from your win) but yeah i've been playing some shit for a while
  75. IsaVulpes whatevers
  76. andrewbeeksma well i gotta run. thanks for the game, best of luck with future games, i'll keep an eye on how you do:)
  77. IsaVulpes good luck in the rest of the tournament
  78. andrewbeeksma it'll turn around