lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.1
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1Nf3+0.1b6+0.52g3+0.2Bb7+0.33Bg2+0.2g6+0.44c4+0.3Bg7+0.65Nc3?!0.0...Inaccuracy. d4 was best.5.d4Nf66.d5[...]5...c5+0.46O-O+0.1Nf6+0.57b3?!−0.1...Inaccuracy. d4 was best.7.d4cxd48.Qxd4[...]7...O-O+0.28Bb20.0Nc6?!+0.6Inaccuracy. e6 was best.8...e69e3+0.3Re8?!+0.9Inaccuracy. d5 was best.9...d510.Nxd5Nxd5[...]10d4+0.7cxd4+0.911exd4?!+0.2...Inaccuracy. Nxd4 was best.11.Nxd4Qc812.Nde2[...]11...d5+0.212Ne5+0.3e6+0.213f4−0.3Rc80.014Nb5?!−0.8...Inaccuracy. cxd5 was best.14.cxd5Nxd515.Nxd5[...]14...a6−0.615Nc3−0.8Ne7−0.516Rc1?!−1.0...Inaccuracy. b4 was best.16.b416...Rc7−0.917Na4−1.0dxc4−0.918Bxb7−1.1Rxb7−0.919Qf3−1.1Rc7−0.920bxc4−1.0b5−0.921Nc5−1.0bxc4−0.822Nxa6−1.0Ra7−0.823Nb4−1.1Qb6?!−0.5Inaccuracy. c3 was best.23...c324Rxc4−0.5Nfd5−0.525a3−0.5h5−0.526Kh1−0.7Nf5−0.527Rc6?!−1.1...Inaccuracy. Rfc1 was best.27.Rfc127...Nxd4??+1.3Blunder. Qb8 was best.27...Qb828.Rc228Qf2??−4.6...Blunder. Qxd5 was best.28.Qxd5Nxc629.Qxc6[...]28...Nxc6−4.429Qxb6−4.6Nxb6−4.630Nbxc6−4.6Rc7−4.531Bd4−4.4Nd5−4.432a4?!−6.9...Inaccuracy. Nb4 was best.32.Nb4Rd833.Bg1[...]32...Rec8?!−4.5Inaccuracy. f6 was best.32...f633Rc1?−8.8...Mistake. Na7 was best.33.Na7Rc134.Nxc8[...]33...Bxe5−8.6
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/LhAvwVWd"] [Date "2019.09.01"] [White "kajoM"] [Black "toni4127"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "LhAvwVWd"] [UTCDate "2019.09.01"] [UTCTime "16:00:53"] [WhiteElo "1967"] [BlackElo "1946"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-13"] [BlackRatingDiff "+13"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "A04"] [Opening "Zukertort Opening: Queenside Fianchetto Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. Nf3 b6 { A04 Zukertort Opening: Queenside Fianchetto Variation } 2. g3 Bb7 3. Bg2 g6 4. c4 Bg7 5. Nc3?! { (0.60 → 0.04) Inaccuracy. d4 was best. } (5. d4 Nf6 6. d5 Ne4 7. Nbd2 Nxd2 8. Qxd2 Na6 9. O-O O-O) 5... c5 6. O-O Nf6 7. b3?! { (0.54 → -0.10) Inaccuracy. d4 was best. } (7. d4 cxd4 8. Qxd4 d6 9. Rd1 Nbd7 10. b3 Nc5 11. Bb2 O-O) 7... O-O 8. Bb2 Nc6?! { (-0.03 → 0.62) Inaccuracy. e6 was best. } (8... e6) 9. e3 Re8?! { (0.25 → 0.90) Inaccuracy. d5 was best. } (9... d5 10. Nxd5 Nxd5 11. Bxg7 Kxg7 12. cxd5 Qxd5 13. d4 Rad8 14. Rc1 Qe6 15. Re1 Qf6 16. Qe2) 10. d4 cxd4 11. exd4?! { (0.89 → 0.24) Inaccuracy. Nxd4 was best. } (11. Nxd4 Qc8 12. Nde2 Nd8 13. Qd2 Bxg2 14. Kxg2 Ne6 15. f3 d6 16. e4 Nc5 17. Nd5 Ncd7) 11... d5 12. Ne5 e6 13. f4 Rc8 14. Nb5?! { (0.00 → -0.76) Inaccuracy. cxd5 was best. } (14. cxd5 Nxd5 15. Nxd5 exd5 16. Bh3 Rc7 17. Rc1 f6 18. Nxc6 Rxc6 19. Re1 f5 20. Rxc6 Bxc6) 14... a6 15. Nc3 Ne7 16. Rc1?! { (-0.46 → -1.03) Inaccuracy. b4 was best. } (16. b4) 16... Rc7 17. Na4 dxc4 18. Bxb7 Rxb7 19. Qf3 Rc7 20. bxc4 b5 21. Nc5 bxc4 22. Nxa6 Ra7 23. Nb4 Qb6?! { (-1.10 → -0.52) Inaccuracy. c3 was best. } (23... c3) 24. Rxc4 Nfd5 25. a3 h5 26. Kh1 Nf5 27. Rc6?! { (-0.52 → -1.13) Inaccuracy. Rfc1 was best. } (27. Rfc1) 27... Nxd4?? { (-1.13 → 1.28) Blunder. Qb8 was best. } (27... Qb8 28. Rc2) 28. Qf2?? { (1.28 → -4.59) Blunder. Qxd5 was best. } (28. Qxd5 Nxc6 29. Qxc6 Qxc6+ 30. Nexc6 Ra4 31. Bc1 Kf8 32. Ne5 Raa8 33. Rf2 g5 34. Kg2 gxf4) 28... Nxc6 29. Qxb6 Nxb6 30. Nbxc6 Rc7 31. Bd4 Nd5 32. a4?! { (-4.43 → -6.93) Inaccuracy. Nb4 was best. } (32. Nb4 Rd8 33. Bg1 Rc3 34. Ra1 Nxb4 35. axb4 Rb3 36. Ra2 Bxe5 37. fxe5 Rxb4 38. Bc5 Rc4) 32... Rec8?! { (-6.93 → -4.50) Inaccuracy. f6 was best. } (32... f6) 33. Rc1? { (-4.50 → -8.78) Mistake. Na7 was best. } (33. Na7 Rc1 34. Nxc8 Rxf1+ 35. Kg2 Rd1 36. Bf2 Rd2 37. Kf1 Ra2 38. Nb6 Nxb6 39. Bxb6 Rxa4) 33... Bxe5 { White resigns. } 0-1
7 Inaccuracies
1 Mistake
1 Blunder
61 Average centipawn loss
76%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
4 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
35 Average centipawn loss
88%Accuracy
  1. Wo_Cheng_Si_Le Is this a Reti or an English?
  2. k-night-moves reti, i would guess
  3. colwem D6 has reached optimal fork strength.
  4. colwem Ah I think white agrees with me. But.. it’s not hard to defend.
  5. colwem I just mean a knight fork on d6 will need to be watched over for a while now.
  6. colwem 15 Ne7 at first I thought that threatened xc4. But Bxb7.
  7. colwem Those queen side fianchettos can be really annoying for both side s I think because it’s often not convenient to protect it so it sits there
  8. colwem Hanging
  9. kajoM Didn't he just blunder a piece?
  10. kajoM Oh, wait, no. It's me who blundered.
  11. ErinYu Can someone explain? I'm too dumb to see it.
  12. momor Qxd5 win a piece?
  13. kajoM But how's Qf2 as a move?
  14. toni4127 Before Nxd4, I had no idea who was better there.
  15. kajoM I thought it was me.
  16. toni4127 And SF claims Nxd4 doesn't even work. Yikes.
  17. toni4127 You had the pawn, but I thought it was a lot harder for you to play
  18. toni4127 With almost all the pieces still on, and a naked king
  19. kajoM I dunno. My king felt pretty safe with all your pieces really far from it.
  20. kajoM That's what I felt at least.
  21. toni4127 So 28. Qxd5 was the winning tactic for you
  22. kajoM Don't tell me.
  23. kajoM Oh, you already did, nice.
  24. toni4127 (Sorry)
  25. kajoM Although now that I know about it, it looks realyl abvious.
  26. kajoM At least a piece up.
  27. toni4127 Yeah. Removing the defender. I missed it, there were so many other lines to consider
  28. kajoM Well, I thought that Qf2 was brilliant. Oh well.
  29. toni4127 So without that tactic, I think my plans are just to open lines toward your king with h4, and hope something eventually materializes
  30. toni4127 Anyway. Good game. Good luck with the rest of the season