lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.1
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d4+0.1d5+0.12c4+0.1e6+0.13Nc3+0.3Nf6+0.14cxd50.0exd5+0.15Bg5+0.1Be7+0.16e3+0.2Nbd7+0.37Bd3+0.3h6+0.48Bh4+0.2O-O+0.29Nge2+0.2b6+0.210Qc2+0.2c5+0.211f3−0.2Bb7−0.212O-O−0.2Rc8+0.113Bf2−0.2Re8−0.114Rac1−0.2Nb8+0.315Bf5+0.2Rc6+0.616Rfd1+0.5Bc8+0.917dxc5+0.5Bxc5+0.718Nd4+0.7Bxd4+0.819Rxd4+0.6Be6+0.920Bd3+0.7Rc7+1.221Bb5+0.9Ree7+1.422Qd1+0.9Qc8??+2.9Blunder. a6 was best.22...a623.Be2Nc6[...]23Bg3?!+2.1...Inaccuracy. e4 was best.23.e4a624.exd5[...]23...Rc5+2.524Bd6+1.7
1-0
Black resigned • White is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/GQiVowvx"] [Date "2018.02.13"] [White "yago666"] [Black "roso97"] [Result "1-0"] [GameId "GQiVowvx"] [UTCDate "2018.02.13"] [UTCTime "13:02:22"] [WhiteElo "1998"] [BlackElo "1925"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+9"] [BlackRatingDiff "-9"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "D35"] [Opening "Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Positional Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. cxd5 exd5 5. Bg5 { D35 Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation, Positional Variation } Be7 6. e3 Nbd7 7. Bd3 h6 8. Bh4 O-O 9. Nge2 b6 10. Qc2 c5 11. f3 Bb7 12. O-O Rc8 13. Bf2 Re8 14. Rac1 Nb8 15. Bf5 Rc6 16. Rfd1 Bc8 17. dxc5 Bxc5 18. Nd4 Bxd4 19. Rxd4 Be6 20. Bd3 Rc7 21. Bb5 Ree7 22. Qd1 Qc8?? { (0.94 → 2.87) Blunder. a6 was best. } (22... a6 23. Be2 Nc6 24. Ra4 a5 25. Bg3 Rc8 26. Ba6 Ra8 27. Bb5 Rc8 28. Bh4 g5 29. Bg3) 23. Bg3?! { (2.87 → 2.05) Inaccuracy. e4 was best. } (23. e4 a6 24. exd5 axb5 25. d6 Nc6 26. Rd2 Red7 27. dxc7 Qxc7 28. Nxb5 Qf4 29. Rxd7 Bxd7) 23... Rc5 24. Bd6 { Black resigns. } 1-0
01011010100110
yago666roso97
43
yago666 +9
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
19 Average centipawn loss
91%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
roso97 −9
0 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
26 Average centipawn loss
87%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation
  1. roso97 (1) There we go, already out of prep :D
  2. roso97 (1) He will have prepared something nice against the KID so I am not risking it
  3. roso97 (5) I have no idea what Im doing, lets just play some moves
  4. yago666 I guess he's afraid of prep, but going for the QGD exchange when you're a KID player seems weird
  5. yago666 don't really know theory here tbh, just know I go Nge2, Qc2, sometimes f3-e4, sometimes 0-0-0... in general just attack kingside
  6. yago666 I do know there is a Nh5 move somewhere that kind of revived this variation, but not gonna worry about that
  7. roso97 (9) Not really sure what black does in positions like this
  8. yago666 minority attack is also typical in this structure so probably have to consider that as well
  9. roso97 (9) Not sure if c5 is any good here
  10. yago666 I think black's supposed to go c6-Re8_Nf8-g6 here
  11. yago666 or maybe not since my bishop and queen would be pointing at g6. Ah well, I'm not playing black
  12. roso97 (9) I have to make a move
  13. yago666 I'm pretty sure b6 isn't a thing, but not at all sure why not
  14. yago666 probably because it leaves his c pawn weak? but he might be planning c5
  15. roso97 (10) I have to do this I think. It is probably terrible but I despise passive positions
  16. yago666 guessing this is not a line where I want 0-0-0
  17. yago666 I am lost like a baby without his opening theory here
  18. Lukhas this just 24h after complaining that no one in the league knows theory
  19. yago666 not giving up on 0-0-0 yet
  20. Maqqa Well if you're spending your study time looking up 10 moves of opening theory I'd argue that isn't helpful
  21. roso97 (11) Ah, he wants e4, makes sense. Looks a bit strange though with the king in the center but I guess he saw that he is fine
  22. yago666 going e4 will be problematic though, as c4 would hurt
  23. roso97 (11) Taking on d4 followed by Bb7 is tempting to discourage e4
  24. yago666 f3 probably wasn't great
  25. yago666 gone are the dreams of glory
  26. roso97 (13) Re8 looks natural but I will have to keep an eye on f7 which could be slightly week once the f-file opens up for him
  27. roso97 (14) Argh my pieces are so clumsy
  28. yago666 that's what I call an unexpected move.
  29. roso97 (14) I am sending my knight on a journey. It looks (and probably is) ridiculous, but what to do
  30. Maqqa hmm I don't like that knight retreat, seems to invite Bf5
  31. roso97 15) Rc6 looks akward but the alternative is to just go back which is kinda lame too
  32. yago666 well that's an interesting move
  33. roso97 (15) Maybe I can trade of his annoying bishop next
  34. roso97 (15) The more I look at this position the more ridiculous my pieces look
  35. GetAGripWhitby So, stop looking :D
  36. yago666 wanted to go e4 at once but couldn't work it out. I need to work on my calculation.
  37. Maqqa I wonder why he thought e4 doesn't work
  38. roso97 (16) Can I somehow sack a pawn in a good way? Dont really see it yet
  39. Lukhas 16..g6 would almost sac a mate, in a good way
  40. roso97 (16) I think I will give him the d5 pawn for some breathing space. It is very bad but yeah, this is lost anyways
  41. yago666 why did I play dx without calculating
  42. roso97 (17) At least I hit e3
  43. yago666 2 bishops vs isolated pawn, I should be good
  44. roso97 (20) I might have to give that exchange
  45. Maqqa shame he's misevaluating the position
  46. MilsBees This can't be a fun position to play in time trouble
  47. roso97 I didnt find a moce
  48. Maqqa kick that bishop out!!
  49. Maqqa RIP rook
  50. cammusbread nice fork
  51. cammusbread gg
  52. GetAGripWhitby gg
  53. Maqqa can't blame him with that time pressure
  54. Maqqa nice one yago
  55. yago666 the explorer is temporarily out of service? lichess pls
  56. roso97 not that we would have played theory for long anyways :D
  57. yago666 yeah I was out of book after b6
  58. yago666 f3 was clearly wrong
  59. roso97 I was out of book after cxd5
  60. roso97 Not a good idea to decide to play a new opening at the board
  61. roso97 Which I have no intention of playing, ever
  62. roso97 sometimes I am silly
  63. yago666 I think playing something your opponent doesn't expect certainly has value
  64. yago666 but for a KID player there are more logical choices than the QGD
  65. roso97 I couldnt think of any
  66. roso97 Maybe the Slav
  67. roso97 I dont really wanna play a dutch if I know nothing
  68. yago666 slav (maybe with g6 at some point), grunfeld
  69. roso97 I dont know any Grünfeld either. But to be fair, I dont know QGD either, but it seemed easier to play
  70. yago666 it probably is
  71. roso97 I should have just played the KID
  72. yago666 but the QGD exchange is supposed to be quite good for white
  73. roso97 But somehow I panicked at the board
  74. yago666 looks I did have 16. e4
  75. yago666 really wanted to play that too, not sure why I decided against it
  76. yago666 I think I was afraid of having an isolated pawn
  77. yago666 but that position is clearly good for white
  78. roso97 Rxc3 is indeed interesting there
  79. roso97 I am glad I saw one interesting idea today
  80. yago666 I hadn't considered exchange sacs but wasn't particularly afraid of them here
  81. roso97 Probably still not very good but one of the top 3 moves at least
  82. yago666 interesting stuff
  83. yago666 I'd like the opening explorer here, but I'm thinking I just need to 0-0 and play this positionally
  84. roso97 Yeah, it somehow isnt a very fun line to play as black
  85. roso97 very cramped
  86. yago666 also very solid
  87. yago666 it's just a choice :P
  88. roso97 Looks like I have made my choice, but it was good that I tried it once :D
  89. yago666 trying is fun
  90. yago666 although the QGD doesn't really attract me either
  91. roso97 I should try more things in the 4545 league in general
  92. roso97 keep my main repertoire for otb chess
  93. yago666 try the grunfeld! it's super fascinating and nobody knows how to play against it at this level
  94. roso97 but of course getting practice in those lines has its one merits
  95. roso97 I will give it a try
  96. yago666 anyway, thanks for the game and good luck next round
  97. roso97 Gl to you too, see you around