lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.3
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d4+0.3e6+0.22c4+0.2Nf6+0.33Nc3+0.1Bb4+0.24Bg5−0.1O-O+0.15Nf30.0d6+0.26e3+0.1Nbd7+0.37Be2+0.2b6+0.38O-O0.0Bxc30.09bxc30.0Bb7+0.410d5?−1.0...Mistake. Nd2 was best.10.Nd2h611.Bh4[...]10...Qe8−1.011Qc2−1.0exd5−0.912cxd5−1.0Bxd5−1.113Rfd1−1.1Bc6−0.814Rd4?!−1.4...Inaccuracy. Nd4 was best.14.Nd4Bb715.Nb5[...]14...h6−1.315Bxf6−1.2Nxf6−1.116g4?!−1.9...Inaccuracy. Rf4 was best.16.Rf4Rd817.a4[...]16...Be4−1.817Qa4−1.8c5?!−1.1Inaccuracy. Bc6 was best.17...Bc618.Qc218Qxe8−1.2Rfxe8−1.219Rxd6−1.2Nxg4−1.120Nh4−1.2Nf6−1.321Bc4?!−2.0...Inaccuracy. f3 was best.21.f3Bd522.e4[...]21...Rad8−1.922Rad1−2.0Rxd6−2.023Rxd6−2.0Kf8−1.924f3−2.5Ke7−2.225Rd2−2.3Bc6?−0.8Mistake. g5 was best.25...g526.fxe4gxh4[...]26e4−1.0g6−1.127e5−1.1Nh5−1.028Kf2−1.1Nf4?!−0.4Inaccuracy. b5 was best.28...b529.Rd6bxc4[...]29Ke3−0.7Ne6?!−0.1Inaccuracy. g5 was best.29...g530.Rd6Ba4[...]30f4?!−0.7...Inaccuracy. Rd6 was best.30.Rd6Bd731.f4[...]30...b5?+0.8Mistake. Nxf4 was best.30...Nxf431.Kxf431Bxe6+0.8fxe6+0.932Rd6+0.6Rc8?!+1.7Inaccuracy. Bd7 was best.32...Bd733.Nxg6+33Nxg6++1.5Kf7+1.434Nh4?!+0.6...Inaccuracy. f5 was best.34.f5exf535.Rf6+[...]34...b4+1.035c4+1.2a5?!+2.2Inaccuracy. Ba4 was best.35...Ba436.f5Re8[...]36f5+1.5exf5??+3.6Blunder. a4 was best.36...a437Nxf5+3.5a4??+7.6Blunder. Re8 was best.37...Re838.Rf6+Kg8[...]38Rf6++7.4Kg8+8.939Kd2??+1.8...Blunder. Ne7+ was best.39.Ne7+39...Rd8++1.740Kc1+1.7Be4+2.041Nxh6+??0.0...Blunder. Nd6 was best.41.Nd6Bc642.Nf7[...]41...Kg70.042Ng4−0.5Re8−0.143Rf4−0.4Bc6+0.244Rf6?−0.9...Mistake. h4 was best.44.h4Re744...Bd7−0.945h3??−2.9...Blunder. Nf2 was best.45.Nf245...Bxg4−2.846hxg4−2.7Rxe5−2.347Rf2?!−3.2...Inaccuracy. Rc6 was best.47.Rc6a348.Kd2[...]47...Re4−3.148Rf5−3.7Rxc4+−3.149Kb2?!−3.9...Inaccuracy. Kd1 was best.49.Kd1Kg649...Rxg4??0.0Blunder. a3+ was best.49...a3+50Rxc50.0Rg2+0.051Rc20.0Rg30.052Rc40.0Rg2+0.053Rc20.0Rg40.054Rc7+0.0Kf60.055Ra70.0a3+0.056Kb30.0Ke60.057Rb70.0Kd60.058Rxb40.0Rxb4+0.059Kxb40.0Kc60.060Kxa30.0Kb60.061Kb40.0Ka60.062a40.0Ka70.063Kb50.0Kb70.064Kc50.0Ka60.065Kb40.0Kb60.066a5+0.0Ka70.067Kb50.0Kb70.068a6+0.0Ka70.069Ka50.0Ka80.070Kb60.0Kb80.071Kc60.0Ka70.072Kb50.0Ka80.073Kc60.0Ka70.074Kb50.0Ka80.075Ka50.0Ka70.076Kb50.0Ka80.077Kb60.0Kb80.078Kc60.0Ka70.079Kb50.0Ka80.080Kb60.0Kb80.081a7+0.0Ka80.082Ka60.0
½-½
Stalemate
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/AFJgzmmu"] [Date "2017.08.07"] [White "Napoleon_Solo"] [Black "leinax"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [GameId "AFJgzmmu"] [UTCDate "2017.08.07"] [UTCTime "02:00:33"] [WhiteElo "1589"] [BlackElo "1547"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-1"] [BlackRatingDiff "+1"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "E30"] [Opening "Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 e6 2. c4 Nf6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bg5 { E30 Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation } O-O 5. Nf3 d6 6. e3 Nbd7 7. Be2 b6 8. O-O Bxc3 9. bxc3 Bb7 10. d5? { (0.38 → -1.00) Mistake. Nd2 was best. } (10. Nd2 h6 11. Bh4 g5 12. Bg3 Ne4 13. Nxe4 Bxe4 14. f3 Bg6 15. e4 f5 16. exf5 exf5) 10... Qe8 11. Qc2 exd5 12. cxd5 Bxd5 13. Rfd1 Bc6 14. Rd4?! { (-0.80 → -1.45) Inaccuracy. Nd4 was best. } (14. Nd4 Bb7 15. Nb5 Qe4 16. Qxe4 Nxe4 17. Be7 Rfc8 18. f3 Nec5 19. Bh4 a5 20. Rab1 Ba6) 14... h6 15. Bxf6 Nxf6 16. g4?! { (-1.13 → -1.90) Inaccuracy. Rf4 was best. } (16. Rf4 Rd8 17. a4 Be4 18. Bd3 d5 19. a5 Bxd3 20. Qxd3 Ne4 21. Qc2 Qc6 22. c4 Rde8) 16... Be4 17. Qa4 c5?! { (-1.83 → -1.08) Inaccuracy. Bc6 was best. } (17... Bc6 18. Qc2) 18. Qxe8 Rfxe8 19. Rxd6 Nxg4 20. Nh4 Nf6 21. Bc4?! { (-1.27 → -2.00) Inaccuracy. f3 was best. } (21. f3 Bd5 22. e4 Be6 23. Rd2 g5 24. Ng2 Red8 25. Rad1 Rxd2 26. Rxd2 Kf8 27. h4 Ke7) 21... Rad8 22. Rad1 Rxd6 23. Rxd6 Kf8 24. f3 Ke7 25. Rd2 Bc6? { (-2.26 → -0.79) Mistake. g5 was best. } (25... g5 26. fxe4 gxh4 27. Rf2 Rg8+ 28. Kf1 Rg4 29. Bd5 Nxd5 30. exd5 Rc4 31. d6+ Kxd6 32. Rxf7) 26. e4 g6 27. e5 Nh5 28. Kf2 Nf4?! { (-1.12 → -0.44) Inaccuracy. b5 was best. } (28... b5 29. Rd6 bxc4 30. Rxc6 Rd8 31. Rxc5 Rd2+ 32. Kf1 Rxa2 33. Ng2 Ke6 34. f4 g5 35. Rxc4) 29. Ke3 Ne6?! { (-0.71 → -0.10) Inaccuracy. g5 was best. } (29... g5 30. Rd6 Ba4 31. Nf5+ Kf8 32. Kf2 Rxe5 33. Nxh6 Re7 34. Kg3 b5 35. Rd8+ Kg7 36. Nf5+) 30. f4?! { (-0.10 → -0.73) Inaccuracy. Rd6 was best. } (30. Rd6 Bd7 31. f4 Nxf4 32. Kxf4 g5+ 33. Ke4 gxh4 34. Bxf7 Rf8 35. Bb3 Rf2 36. Rxh6 Bf5+) 30... b5? { (-0.73 → 0.77) Mistake. Nxf4 was best. } (30... Nxf4 31. Kxf4) 31. Bxe6 fxe6 32. Rd6 Rc8?! { (0.60 → 1.69) Inaccuracy. Bd7 was best. } (32... Bd7 33. Nxg6+) 33. Nxg6+ Kf7 34. Nh4?! { (1.41 → 0.60) Inaccuracy. f5 was best. } (34. f5 exf5 35. Rf6+ Ke8 36. Kf4 Kd8 37. Rd6+ Ke8 38. Nh4 Be4 39. Rxh6 Kd7 40. Ra6 Rh8) 34... b4 35. c4 a5?! { (1.15 → 2.15) Inaccuracy. Ba4 was best. } (35... Ba4 36. f5 Re8 37. Ra6 Bc2 38. Rxa7+ Kg8 39. Ra5 Rd8 40. fxe6 Kf8 41. Rxc5 Rd3+ 42. Ke2) 36. f5 exf5?? { (1.52 → 3.63) Blunder. a4 was best. } (36... a4) 37. Nxf5 a4?? { (3.47 → 7.56) Blunder. Re8 was best. } (37... Re8 38. Rf6+ Kg8 39. Nxh6+ Kh7 40. Rxc6 Rxe5+ 41. Kf3 Re1 42. Ng4 Ra1 43. Rxc5 Rxa2 44. Rb5) 38. Rf6+ Kg8 39. Kd2?? { (8.90 → 1.77) Blunder. Ne7+ was best. } (39. Ne7+) 39... Rd8+ 40. Kc1 Be4 41. Nxh6+?? { (1.95 → 0.00) Blunder. Nd6 was best. } (41. Nd6 Bc6 42. Nf7 Rd4 43. Nxh6+ Kh7 44. Rxc6 Rxc4+ 45. Kb1 Re4 46. Nf5 Re1+ 47. Kc2 Re2+) 41... Kg7 42. Ng4 Re8 43. Rf4 Bc6 44. Rf6? { (0.16 → -0.95) Mistake. h4 was best. } (44. h4 Re7) 44... Bd7 45. h3?? { (-0.89 → -2.90) Blunder. Nf2 was best. } (45. Nf2) 45... Bxg4 46. hxg4 Rxe5 47. Rf2?! { (-2.30 → -3.17) Inaccuracy. Rc6 was best. } (47. Rc6 a3 48. Kd2 Kf7 49. Kd3 Re1 50. Rxc5 b3 51. axb3 a2 52. Ra5 Rd1+ 53. Ke4 a1=Q) 47... Re4 48. Rf5 Rxc4+ 49. Kb2?! { (-3.06 → -3.87) Inaccuracy. Kd1 was best. } (49. Kd1 Kg6) 49... Rxg4?? { (-3.87 → 0.00) Blunder. a3+ was best. } (49... a3+) 50. Rxc5 Rg2+ 51. Rc2 Rg3 52. Rc4 Rg2+ 53. Rc2 Rg4 54. Rc7+ Kf6 55. Ra7 a3+ 56. Kb3 Ke6 57. Rb7 Kd6 58. Rxb4 Rxb4+ 59. Kxb4 Kc6 60. Kxa3 Kb6 61. Kb4 Ka6 62. a4 Ka7 63. Kb5 Kb7 64. Kc5 Ka6 65. Kb4 Kb6 66. a5+ Ka7 67. Kb5 Kb7 68. a6+ Ka7 69. Ka5 Ka8 70. Kb6 Kb8 71. Kc6 Ka7 72. Kb5 Ka8 73. Kc6 Ka7 74. Kb5 Ka8 75. Ka5 Ka7 76. Kb5 Ka8 77. Kb6 Kb8 78. Kc6 Ka7 79. Kb5 Ka8 80. Kb6 Kb8 81. a7+ Ka8 82. Ka6 { Draw by stalemate. } 1/2-1/2
10½½
Napoleon_Sololeinax
1½½
Napoleon_Solo −1
7 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
3 Blunders
30 Average centipawn loss
88%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
leinax +1
5 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
3 Blunders
30 Average centipawn loss
88%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation
  1. LuvGangster 14.. h6 scary move
  2. LuvGangster 14..h6 15. Bh4 g5 16 Nxg5 hxg5 17 Bxg5 ideas of Rh4, Bg4...
  3. LuvGangster aww not as complicated
  4. LuvGangster and then he plays complicated!
  5. LuvGangster problem is g5 hxg5 and rook can't go to h4 which looks ideal
  6. LuvGangster Ne7 1-0
  7. LuvGangster maybe Ne7 is a little more complicated than i give loll
  8. jg777 Lets go leinax with the big D here!
  9. LuvGangster i think he can hold it
  10. LuvGangster he has a king and white doesn't
  11. jg777 Wait white doesn't have a king? Then the game must be over! 😉
  12. LuvGangster even when my king is captured i play on for a few more moves
  13. jg777 Ah, bishop needs to be on the h7-b1 diagonal.
  14. LuvGangster seems like black is winning a pawn back
  15. jg777 Put the bishop back on e4 leinax, come on lets get that bishop as active as you can
  16. LuvGangster can't defend the knight and the e5 pawn in one move
  17. LuvGangster well actually Rf4
  18. LuvGangster Rf4 Bxg4 Rxg4+ Kf7
  19. LuvGangster dunno how else to maintain that pawn on e5
  20. jg777 Yeah I'm not sure I want to trade the bishop for knight
  21. LuvGangster i think it will lead to black equalizing material
  22. LuvGangster and then it's the three pawns vs the passed pawn on the h file
  23. LuvGangster Bxg4 hxg4 Rxe5
  24. jg777 Well now I do since I win the pawn.
  25. LuvGangster even i think RF4 will win the pawn back
  26. LuvGangster but who knows this is much simpler for black
  27. jg777 Yeah but it's still tricky for black, for example if white goes Rc6 holding the black pieces temporarily and activates his king, it's still
  28. jg777 Well not good for white here retreating in my opinion
  29. jg777 Well now it's a draw
  30. jg777 Blacks king is to far from the action to even hope to play for a win and white can't play for a win either being a pawn down here
  31. jg777 White just plays Ra5 next and it should force the draw
  32. LuvGangster draw is pretty good for black, i feel white had a dangerous position in middle game
  33. jg777 Yup good draw leinax! Endgame comeback.
  34. LuvGangster yep!
  35. LuvGangster might as well play it out to the end, good endgame practice and he's up 20 minutes
  36. jg777 Leinax thinks up a pawn, way more time, momentum shifted to me, why not play on? But it should be draw here by white
  37. jg777 Rc4 and white has the draw, not much black can do about it.
  38. jg777 White should have just left the rook on c4 and moved his king back to b1
  39. jg777 But allowing black time to get his king over only gives white more headaches
  40. jg777 Ra4 next should be draw.
  41. jg777 Luckily white has a rook pawn so it's almost assured a draw at worse for black but now he lost his pawn advantage so he just needs to head
  42. jg777 For the draw and wrap the game up.
  43. jg777 It was a fun game, nice comebacks for both sides.
  44. LuvGangster 14..h6 what side do you think is better?
  45. LuvGangster in this position, white to move
  46. jg777 Move 15 for white you mean?
  47. LuvGangster yeah
  48. jg777 Maybe Bh4 or Bf4- I don't think I have a concrete line if Bxh6 or anything yet. Definitely won't give the bishop pair up though.
  49. LuvGangster nakamura school of endgames
  50. jg777 I think white has the easier position to play there, not sure he was objectively better but it was easier position for white I think
  51. LuvGangster yeah thats what i thought too
  52. LuvGangster gg
  53. jg777 Good game guys!
  54. Napoleon_Solo did same thing in my 30/30 game. Just get careless after awhile.
  55. Napoleon_Solo +7.5 jesus
  56. Napoleon_Solo i'm a scrub
  57. Napoleon_Solo Wow I saw that fork too but for some reason I didn't think the rook was defended
  58. Napoleon_Solo Saw the king picking it up at the end. brutal
  59. Napoleon_Solo Literally I looked at Ne7 for awhile and saw the king picking up my rook at the end by playing Kg7.
  60. LuvGangster yeah tough move to miss, i thought the same thing as you
  61. Napoleon_Solo clearly a pawn there though haha
  62. Napoleon_Solo computer actually says +49.7 there which is another way of saying I'm an idiot for missing it
  63. Napoleon_Solo But to battle back from down a pawn to a winning position twice in one day is brutal.
  64. Napoleon_Solo And ended up with two draws.
  65. LuvGangster even though you were down a pawn, your position was double sided
  66. LuvGangster in the middle game
  67. LuvGangster until you exchanged bishop/queen
  68. LuvGangster in fact i would've taken your position probably, seems more playable
  69. Napoleon_Solo Yeah I don't know what it is. I drop a pawn in every game but manage to battle back always.
  70. LuvGangster i thought it was on purpose :P
  71. Napoleon_Solo Yeah right. A person who blows a +49.7 position isn't dropping pawns for strategic reasons. haha
  72. Napoleon_Solo That's just called being bad at chess.
  73. LuvGangster x_x don't beat yourself up
  74. LuvGangster d5 is very natural to move to make in that position
  75. LuvGangster i think it has practical good aspects to it
  76. LuvGangster computer says -1 but its a human game
  77. Napoleon_Solo My lonewolf game was against a 1780 opponent and that would have been my highest win ever.
  78. Napoleon_Solo Oddly enough I was -50 in that game.
  79. LuvGangster :( ive had 4545 games like that
  80. LuvGangster being up some crazy number and still losing or drawing
  81. LuvGangster very frustrating
  82. LuvGangster but it shows you're doing well
  83. LuvGangster at some things
  84. Napoleon_Solo Two games. -50 as black and draw. +50 as white and draw. Maybe this isn't my game.
  85. Napoleon_Solo Thanks for the comments and analysis during the game. I'll review and see if I can not suck as much next time.
  86. LuvGangster being up that much shows it is your sort of game
  87. LuvGangster just gotta get more consistent or better at closing...and that's really hard to do
  88. LuvGangster it's where i'm at x.x
  89. LuvGangster np gl next season and in 3030, might see you there :3