lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
0.0
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e40.0e6+0.12d40.0d50.03Nc30.0Nf60.04Bg5−0.2dxe40.05Nxe40.0Be7+0.36Bd3?!−0.8...Inaccuracy. Bxf6 was best.6.Bxf6Bxf67.Nf3[...]6...Bd7?!+0.2Inaccuracy. Nxe4 was best.6...Nxe47.Bxe7Nxf2[...]7Nf3−0.2Bc6?!+0.7Inaccuracy. Nxe4 was best.7...Nxe48.Bxe7Nxf2[...]8Qe2+0.2Nbd7+0.79O-O+0.2Bxe4+0.310Bxe4+0.2Nxe4+0.311Bxe7+0.3Qxe7+0.312Qxe4+0.3c6+0.413c4+0.2Rd8+0.314Rfe1+0.2O-O+0.315Rad1+0.2Nf6+0.216Qe3+0.3Rd6+0.317h3+0.2b6+0.318Ne5+0.3Nd7+0.319Nf3+0.2Nf6+0.320Ne5+0.2
½-½
Draw claimed • Insufficient material
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/9wPACJhW"] [Date "2020.09.12"] [White "thoughtless2"] [Black "landmoose"] [Result "1/2-1/2"] [GameId "9wPACJhW"] [UTCDate "2020.09.12"] [UTCTime "18:01:16"] [WhiteElo "2011"] [BlackElo "2031"] [WhiteRatingDiff "+0"] [BlackRatingDiff "-1"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "C11"] [Opening "French Defense: Burn Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 { C11 French Defense: Burn Variation } dxe4 5. Nxe4 Be7 6. Bd3?! { (0.25 → -0.80) Inaccuracy. Bxf6 was best. } (6. Bxf6 Bxf6 7. Nf3 Nd7 8. g3 O-O 9. Bg2 e5 10. O-O exd4) 6... Bd7?! { (-0.80 → 0.17) Inaccuracy. Nxe4 was best. } (6... Nxe4 7. Bxe7 Nxf2 8. Bxd8 Nxd1 9. Rxd1 Kxd8 10. Nf3 h6 11. O-O) 7. Nf3 Bc6?! { (-0.20 → 0.66) Inaccuracy. Nxe4 was best. } (7... Nxe4 8. Bxe7 Nxf2 9. Bxd8 Nxd1 10. Bxc7 Nxb2 11. Be4 Bc6 12. Bxc6+) 8. Qe2 Nbd7 9. O-O Bxe4 10. Bxe4 Nxe4 11. Bxe7 Qxe7 12. Qxe4 c6 13. c4 Rd8 14. Rfe1 O-O 15. Rad1 Nf6 16. Qe3 Rd6 17. h3 b6 18. Ne5 Nd7 19. Nf3 Nf6 20. Ne5 { The game is a draw. } 1/2-1/2
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
18 Average centipawn loss
90%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
2 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
20 Average centipawn loss
89%Accuracy
  1. connerator go thoughtless!
  2. thoughtless2 A bit of a dull line after black exchanged on e4. I was hoping for something sharper
  3. Svendra Go Thoughtless!
  4. White offers draw
  5. Draw offer accepted
  6. Svendra O.k. good draw guys!
  7. thoughtless2 I really didn't know how to push it, I figured with the match score a draw was okay
  8. Svendra @thoughtless2 Watch ou next time for 6.Bd3 that is a mistake
  9. thoughtless2 Ah because of Qb4
  10. Svendra 6.Bd3 Pxe4 7.Bxe7 Nxf2!
  11. thoughtless2 Good to know! I've never played this line before
  12. thoughtless2 It's really boring
  13. Svendra At move 6 you have to take 6.Bxf6
  14. Svendra Yes this is calle the Burn variation
  15. Svendra Sort of Rubinstein, it is a bit boring yes
  16. thoughtless2 Are there any plans to break this c6 e6 structure? It's extremely solid
  17. Svendra The main plan is try to set up a king attack, putting a knight on e5
  18. Svendra long castling is very possible too
  19. thoughtless2 That makes sense, I was a bit hesitant about playing f4
  20. Svendra f4 is not usual, you have tio play with the pieces i guess
  21. thoughtless2 Not visiting this line in the future I think haha
  22. Svendra So 6.Bxf6 at some moment Ne5 and see what black does, followed by short or long castling
  23. Svendra haha
  24. thoughtless2 Thanks Sven!
  25. Svendra I think 6.Bxf6 Bxf6 7.Nf3 0-0 8.Qd2 and 9.0-0-0 is ver possible
  26. Svendra We shoul punsih this kind of tame openings lol:)
  27. thoughtless2 Absolutely haha
  28. thoughtless2 It looks very interesting
  29. thoughtless2 I was hoping for 4. Be7 e5 Nfd7 h4
  30. thoughtless2 I was looking at that variation a bit, it's very promising
  31. Svendra Anyway , you played 0-1-0 thats very goor. And a draw is a good team result!
  32. Svendra Ah the Aljechin-Chatard attack!
  33. Svendra Thats is not boring no
  34. thoughtless2 What lines do you usually go for against the french?
  35. thoughtless2 I played the KIA so much that I'm very unfamiliar with other lines