lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.2
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.2e5+0.12Nc3+0.1Nf6+0.13d4−0.2Bb4??+2.2Blunder. exd4 was best.3...exd44.Qxd4Nc6[...]4Bg5??−0.2...Blunder. dxe5 was best.4.dxe5Nxe45.Qg4[...]4...h6−0.55Bxf6−0.1Qxf6−0.46Nf3−0.5Nc6−0.67a3−0.8exd4−1.38axb4?−2.6...Mistake. Nxd4 was best.8.Nxd4Qxd49.axb4[...]8...dxc3−2.49Bc4?−4.6...Mistake. b5 was best.9.b5cxb29...cxb2−4.610Rb1?!−6.8...Inaccuracy. Ra3 was best.10.Ra3Nxb411.O-O[...]10...Qc3+−7.011Nd2−6.8Ne5?!−4.4Inaccuracy. Nxb4 was best.11...Nxb412.O-ONxc2[...]12Bb3−4.1O-O−4.513O-O−4.3a5−3.614f4?!−5.2...Inaccuracy. bxa5 was best.14.bxa514...a4−5.515fxe5−5.4axb3−5.416Nxb3−5.5Qe3+−4.817Kh1−4.8Qxe4−4.618Re1−5.4Qxb4−5.519Rxb2−5.3d6−5.6
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/9QzXWtBV"] [Date "2021.08.15"] [White "Jamoke"] [Black "RandomJSDev"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "9QzXWtBV"] [UTCDate "2021.08.15"] [UTCTime "01:36:01"] [WhiteElo "1855"] [BlackElo "1823"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-9"] [BlackRatingDiff "+21"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "C26"] [Opening "Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 { C26 Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation } 3. d4 Bb4?? { (-0.21 → 2.15) Blunder. exd4 was best. } (3... exd4 4. Qxd4 Nc6 5. Qd3 Bc5 6. Bf4 d6 7. Qd2 Be6 8. Nf3) 4. Bg5?? { (2.15 → -0.23) Blunder. dxe5 was best. } (4. dxe5 Nxe4 5. Qg4 d5 6. Qxg7 Rf8 7. a3 Bxc3+ 8. bxc3 Nd7) 4... h6 5. Bxf6 Qxf6 6. Nf3 Nc6 7. a3 exd4 8. axb4? { (-1.31 → -2.62) Mistake. Nxd4 was best. } (8. Nxd4 Qxd4 9. axb4 Nxb4 10. Qd2 a5 11. O-O-O Qxd2+ 12. Rxd2 d6 13. Nb5 Na6 14. Nc3 Be6) 8... dxc3 9. Bc4? { (-2.36 → -4.61) Mistake. b5 was best. } (9. b5 cxb2) 9... cxb2 10. Rb1?! { (-4.64 → -6.77) Inaccuracy. Ra3 was best. } (10. Ra3 Nxb4 11. O-O O-O 12. e5 Qf4 13. Bb3 d5 14. exd6 cxd6 15. Qd4 Qxd4 16. Nxd4 Bd7) 10... Qc3+ 11. Nd2 Ne5?! { (-6.76 → -4.36) Inaccuracy. Nxb4 was best. } (11... Nxb4 12. O-O Nxc2 13. Ba2 Na3 14. e5 O-O 15. Re1 Nxb1 16. Bxb1 b5 17. Ne4 Qc1 18. Qxc1) 12. Bb3 O-O 13. O-O a5 14. f4?! { (-3.63 → -5.25) Inaccuracy. bxa5 was best. } (14. bxa5) 14... a4 15. fxe5 axb3 16. Nxb3 Qe3+ 17. Kh1 Qxe4 18. Re1 Qxb4 19. Rxb2 d6 { White resigns. } 0-1
01
JamokeRandomJSDev
01
Jamoke −9
2 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
1 Blunder
60 Average centipawn loss
76%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
RandomJSDev +21
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
35 Average centipawn loss
87%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation
  1. RandomJSDev Vienna lets go
  2. RandomJSDev lol
  3. Jamoke I didn't really prep 3.d4, but I feel like mixing it up
  4. RandomJSDev Never trust people with 100% of one opening :P
  5. Jamoke As I sit here I wonder if I should have looked into what to play if he declines exd4... literally only looked at lines after that.
  6. Jamoke and sure enough im out of book after move 3. LOL. I assume that makes 2 of us, at least
  7. RandomJSDev so this move not theory, rip
  8. RandomJSDev In blitz I would play exd4 instantly but does it actually work
  9. RandomJSDev I think the critical line is exd4 e5! and it doesn't work though because Qe6 and I end up trading bishop for knight and e5 for b2 or so
  10. RandomJSDev I dunno, exd4 e5 Nxe5 Qe2 doesn't seem to work pin is kinda scary
  11. RandomJSDev So exd5 Nxd5 axb4 O-O and do I care his rook his developed?
  12. Jamoke was looking at this line for the last 10 minutes and decided ive already fucked up my opening
  13. RandomJSDev Let's hope I didn't miscalculate this
  14. RandomJSDev not sure this was the right line for white but it's also possible I'm wrong about everything
  15. gavalanche20 (8...dxc3) This seems decent for Black so far
  16. RandomJSDev Maybe just play b3 and try to win the pawn back later? on 9.
  17. Jamoke well, this is a disaster either way so going to just try to get some pieces active
  18. RandomJSDev okay my first instinct is that he blundered a piece
  19. gavalanche20 (9.Bc4) Nd2 in the end probably just holds it together?
  20. RandomJSDev am I missing something tricky
  21. RandomJSDev Like after cxb2 e5! bxa1=Q exf6 axd1+ wins for black and if e5! bxa1=Q Qxa1 then ?
  22. RandomJSDev but I don't even have to be greedy right? I can just take on b2 e5 and Nxe5? because Nxf3 is check
  23. RandomJSDev So I don't see any tactics with Bxf6+ either
  24. RandomJSDev If they are there I suck
  25. RandomJSDev ahhh, knight back so no free piece
  26. RandomJSDev I thought he held everything together with Qe2 but that maybe loses another pawn?
  27. Jamoke (11) I'm 100% missing the threat of ne5. Wasn't a move I had on my radar at all
  28. RandomJSDev but maybe that's the best he has Qe2 and then O-O
  29. RandomJSDev okay so I'm bad
  30. RandomJSDev So on 12. ... a5 looking good but he's just going to bxa5 Rxa5 and then O-O
  31. RandomJSDev I guess he's hoping for qxb4 and then Bxf7+ tricks
  32. RandomJSDev I guess just play solid and nurse my two pawn advantage
  33. RandomJSDev oh wait in that previous line d2 is hanging if he castles so here we go
  34. RandomJSDev If he plays the immediate f4 here I think I sac the knight with a4!
  35. RandomJSDev spicey
  36. RandomJSDev Let's go
  37. RandomJSDev I guess it's not immediately winning but at least it is fun
  38. Jamoke not even enough pieces on the board to get messy, yeesh
  39. RandomJSDev maybe this let it slip a little bit too much
  40. RandomJSDev White is going to have a lot of counterplay I guess
  41. RandomJSDev Luckily he has 3 pawns hanging right now
  42. RandomJSDev Well 2 hanging 3 attacked
  43. RandomJSDev You got me good on the opening lol
  44. Jamoke bro i got myself good
  45. RandomJSDev lol Bb4 is apparently really bad :(
  46. Jamoke literally didn't prep at all
  47. Jamoke for not taking D4
  48. Jamoke tbf I was definitely going to play 2. NF3 until our team's match was already decided
  49. RandomJSDev exd4 is good Bb4 is bad but I didn't see it RIP
  50. RandomJSDev lol Qg4 :(
  51. Jamoke you know
  52. Jamoke i actually looked at that line
  53. Jamoke in game
  54. Jamoke should have thought longer
  55. Jamoke because it's super obviously good, I just didn't think it through and discarded it really quick
  56. RandomJSDev wow Nxb4 instead of Ne5, no wonder you didn't look at Ne5 it was bad!
  57. RandomJSDev Well, not terrible, just not as good
  58. Jamoke Yeah I mean you were already crushing
  59. Jamoke anyways GG
  60. RandomJSDev You too
  61. SNMW (19) gg guys
  62. gavalanche20 Nice, ggs