lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.1
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1b3+0.1e5+0.22Bb2+0.3Nc6+0.13e30.0d5+0.44Bb50.0Bd6+0.35f4+0.3f6+0.46Qh5+0.0g60.07Qh4−0.1exf40.08Nc3−0.2fxe30.09dxe3−0.1Ne7−0.110O-O-O−0.3O-O−0.311g4?−1.7...Mistake. Nxd5 was best.11.Nxd5Nxd511...Be6?!−0.8Inaccuracy. Ne5 was best.11...Ne512Nh3?!−1.8...Inaccuracy. Bxc6 was best.12.Bxc6Nxc613.Nge2[...]12...Ne5−1.813Be2−1.9Qd7?!−1.3Inaccuracy. g5 was best.13...g514e4?!−2.3...Inaccuracy. Nf2 was best.14.Nf214...Bxg4−2.115Nf2−2.0g5??−0.1Blunder. Bxe2 was best.15...Bxe216Bxg40.0gxh4−0.217Bxd7−0.1Nxd7−0.318Nxd5−0.3Nxd5−0.219Rxd50.0Rae8+0.320Kb1?!−0.7...Inaccuracy. Rh5 was best.20.Rh520...Nc5−0.521Ng4?!−1.4...Inaccuracy. Re1 was best.21.Re1Re621...Nxe4−1.222Nh6+−1.2Kh8−1.323Nf5−1.2Be5−1.124Rd7−1.5Nc5−1.525Rd5−1.5Bxb2−1.426Kxb2−1.9Re5−1.827Rhd1−1.8Rxd5?!−0.9Inaccuracy. h3 was best.27...h328.Nh4c6[...]28Rxd5−1.0Ne6?!−0.3Inaccuracy. b6 was best.28...b629Rd7−0.2Re8+0.330Nh6?!−0.7...Inaccuracy. Nxh4 was best.30.Nxh4Rg830...h3?!0.0Inaccuracy. Ng5 was best.30...Ng531Nf7+0.0Kg80.032Nh6+0.0Kh80.033c4??−3.9...Blunder. Nf7+ was best.33.Nf7+Kg834.Nh6+33...Ng5−3.734Rd2−4.2Kg7−4.135Nf5+−4.1Kg6−3.636Ng3−4.2f5−4.037Ka3?−7.7...Mistake. Rf2 was best.37.Rf2Re538.Kc1[...]37...f4−7.438Nf1−8.8Re1−8.739Rf2−8.4Ne6−6.640Nd2−7.4Kh5−7.141Nf3−7.2Re3−6.942Kb4−7.9Kg4−7.643Nd2−7.7Nd4−7.6
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/9IoEobbg"] [Date "2020.05.30"] [White "Antaniserse"] [Black "mcastellani18"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "9IoEobbg"] [UTCDate "2020.05.30"] [UTCTime "20:02:28"] [WhiteElo "2110"] [BlackElo "2056"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-22"] [BlackRatingDiff "+25"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "A01"] [Opening "Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Modern Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. b3 e5 2. Bb2 Nc6 3. e3 { A01 Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Modern Variation } d5 4. Bb5 Bd6 5. f4 f6 6. Qh5+ g6 7. Qh4 exf4 8. Nc3 fxe3 9. dxe3 Ne7 10. O-O-O O-O 11. g4? { (-0.32 → -1.74) Mistake. Nxd5 was best. } (11. Nxd5 Nxd5) 11... Be6?! { (-1.74 → -0.81) Inaccuracy. Ne5 was best. } (11... Ne5) 12. Nh3?! { (-0.81 → -1.80) Inaccuracy. Bxc6 was best. } (12. Bxc6 Nxc6 13. Nge2 Qe7 14. Kb1 Be5 15. Rhf1 Rad8 16. h3 g5 17. Qh6 Qg7 18. Qxg7+ Kxg7) 12... Ne5 13. Be2 Qd7?! { (-1.92 → -1.26) Inaccuracy. g5 was best. } (13... g5) 14. e4?! { (-1.26 → -2.29) Inaccuracy. Nf2 was best. } (14. Nf2) 14... Bxg4 15. Nf2 g5?? { (-2.00 → -0.13) Blunder. Bxe2 was best. } (15... Bxe2) 16. Bxg4 gxh4 17. Bxd7 Nxd7 18. Nxd5 Nxd5 19. Rxd5 Rae8 20. Kb1?! { (0.28 → -0.75) Inaccuracy. Rh5 was best. } (20. Rh5) 20... Nc5 21. Ng4?! { (-0.51 → -1.37) Inaccuracy. Re1 was best. } (21. Re1 Re6) 21... Nxe4 22. Nh6+ Kh8 23. Nf5 Be5 24. Rd7 Nc5 25. Rd5 Bxb2 26. Kxb2 Re5 27. Rhd1 Rxd5?! { (-1.84 → -0.86) Inaccuracy. h3 was best. } (27... h3 28. Nh4 c6 29. R5d4 Re2 30. R1d2 Rfe8 31. b4 Na4+ 32. Kb3 Rxd2 33. Rxd2 Re3+ 34. Rd3) 28. Rxd5 Ne6?! { (-0.99 → -0.34) Inaccuracy. b6 was best. } (28... b6) 29. Rd7 Re8 30. Nh6?! { (0.26 → -0.74) Inaccuracy. Nxh4 was best. } (30. Nxh4 Rg8) 30... h3?! { (-0.74 → 0.00) Inaccuracy. Ng5 was best. } (30... Ng5) 31. Nf7+ Kg8 32. Nh6+ Kh8 33. c4?? { (0.00 → -3.92) Blunder. Nf7+ was best. } (33. Nf7+ Kg8 34. Nh6+) 33... Ng5 34. Rd2 Kg7 35. Nf5+ Kg6 36. Ng3 f5 37. Ka3? { (-4.04 → -7.66) Mistake. Rf2 was best. } (37. Rf2 Re5 38. Kc1 Ne6 39. Kd1 Kg5 40. Rd2 f4 41. Nh1 f3 42. Nf2 Nf4 43. a4 h6) 37... f4 38. Nf1 Re1 39. Rf2 Ne6 40. Nd2 Kh5 41. Nf3 Re3 42. Kb4 Kg4 43. Nd2 Nd4 { White resigns. } 0-1
01
Antanisersemcastellani18
01
Antaniserse −22
5 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
1 Blunder
49 Average centipawn loss
85%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
mcastellani18 +25
5 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
1 Blunder
30 Average centipawn loss
91%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Modern Variation
  1. mcastellani18 and just like that my prep was useless. I have no lines memorized in this system
  2. TaielChess go @Antaniserse
  3. mcastellani18 wow, he has made it very clear he wants to blow me off the board
  4. mcastellani18 interesting, i felt like Nxd5 was the critical move. Be5 comes to mind instantly and it can't be kicked by a pawn, it also defends the d
  5. mcastellani18 pawn
  6. mcastellani18 i guess Nf3 will be annoying, maybe Be7
  7. rselwyn Be5 Nf3 doesn't look pleasant
  8. mcastellani18 as crazy as it looks maybe Bf8 to reroute to g7
  9. Antaniserse (9) there is some compensation, but it’s mostly a “Saturday night” gambit :)
  10. mcastellani18 i don't think theres a good way to hold onto the pawn, i have to develop
  11. mcastellani18 my prep suggested he was a calm positional player.It is safe to say this is way out of my comfort zone
  12. gokuba Go castellani weneed this!
  13. rselwyn That DSB is going to become a monster
  14. gokuba Waiiiiit did we agree fir a higher board to playfor5hem? @floum
  15. rselwyn I believe there was a coin toss that happened between our board 2 and 4 playing
  16. rselwyn (And because there was no sub available)
  17. gokuba 5hat doesn5 matter u cant do it, has the ruleschang3d somehow?
  18. rselwyn I believe section X of the rules according to the mod I talked to
  19. gokuba Players may play down ONE board when all the below requirements are met. The procedure is otherwise the same as playing up a board. No alter
  20. rselwyn He is playing down one board...?
  21. gokuba Read the rules
  22. gokuba Lower board was avalible, and m9st important sid we oked it
  23. gokuba Did we
  24. rselwyn I was sleeping when the details were worked out but I'll let the people who did the talking speak for themselves
  25. gokuba @floum did we???ur the captain
  26. floum mcastellani was ok with it, we flipped a coin
  27. Antaniserse trying to keep e2 free for my bishop, like for example on Ne5
  28. gokuba Flipped the coin ?
  29. gokuba As in?
  30. gokuba Well it is still against the rules
  31. gokuba But lets enjoy anyway
  32. rselwyn White isn't doing too hot here
  33. mcastellani18 queen is so close to getting trapped
  34. TaielChess I asked mcastellani if he wanted to play a board 2 or board 4, he said it doesn't matter
  35. TaielChess I told him well, then you decide who to play, and they didn't wanted to decide so a coin was flipped
  36. gokuba But thats just it if hr avalible @taielchess u got to plau unless break8n last rule, 5hats how i unerstand i5
  37. rselwyn oops
  38. rselwyn that's a piece
  39. mcastellani18 i am dumb, completely missed this i was too foccused on queen moves
  40. TaielChess our B3 set himself unavailable, that's why he's playing
  41. TaielChess because an alt wasn't found
  42. gokuba Ur here taiel, read the rules
  43. TaielChess I don't see what's against the rules
  44. gokuba New additi9n 3 rules all must e met
  45. gokuba Have u read them?
  46. TaielChess I have
  47. gokuba Well cgeck them again
  48. TaielChess I don't see what's the problem, our B3 was unavailable, no alt was found and that's why our B2 is playing
  49. gokuba The problem is that this 8s against the rules plain and simple, how can i explain it just read them
  50. TaielChess what's the problem exactly? we can talk
  51. TaielChess if ypu don't want to explain anything to me, is fine, talk with the mods
  52. floum can we take this to another place ?
  53. gokuba Read the rules an.whats d9ne is done."lex retro non agit" but it is clearlly a
  54. gokuba Breaking the rules
  55. kcacgt (19) (18) I think all lower boards have to be unavailable before someone can play down a board
  56. gokuba Thats it 3rd paragraph
  57. gokuba Ur here taiel ;)
  58. gokuba I mean this win will taste better but
  59. gokuba Ae abov3 break8ng 4545 rules
  60. TaielChess feel free to summon the mods, sir
  61. rselwyn gokuba. While everything may not have been perfectly in line with 4545 rules, nothing was done here in bad faith and everything was done
  62. rselwyn with agreement from both captains
  63. floum I would agree on that
  64. gokuba Oh no
  65. gokuba I am not saying it was bad faith. Do not get me wrong
  66. TaielChess If mcastellani and fluom didn't wanted to play a B2 they can simply say "no"
  67. gokuba Still as PER RULES this is wrong
  68. TaielChess as I said, feel free to summon the mods and explain the situation to them
  69. gokuba And per rules it is not tgeir call
  70. TaielChess neither me or our team will continue talking about this in the chat
  71. rselwyn Alright let's switch back to analysis mode
  72. rselwyn So
  73. rselwyn kb1
  74. rselwyn kind of weird
  75. gokuba Lol do ot get ofeended i am stating a fact here
  76. rselwyn I would have preferred Rh5
  77. gokuba And ir seems onlly i read the rules
  78. kcacgt (20) Agreed, I thought Rg1 or Rh5 was more logical
  79. rselwyn (20b) I thought maybe Ne5 was better
  80. rselwyn I'm wondering if white has some Ng4 trick here (21)
  81. rselwyn It's probably not good enough
  82. rselwyn (21) Re1 just looks so passive
  83. rselwyn and it just loses a pawn
  84. kcacgt (21) I like Ng4!
  85. rselwyn Black can take on e5 with the knight though?
  86. rselwyn But maybe he wants Rf1?
  87. rselwyn Can't play Re1 because of the discovery
  88. kcacgt (22) I think the knight will look good on f5
  89. rselwyn I dont like Nf5
  90. rselwyn Maybe it is fine. I'm not so sure now
  91. rselwyn This is why the knight should be on h6
  92. MrScribbles 1.b3 nice
  93. kcacgt (29) (29) white should be winning back a pawn now, right?
  94. rselwyn Rf7?
  95. kcacgt (29) Just Nh4?
  96. rselwyn Nh4 looks fine. Rh7 looks fine
  97. rselwyn But Ng5?
  98. kcacgt (30) Setting up a perpetual
  99. rselwyn But Ng5 stops the perpetual
  100. kcacgt (30) hmm yeah
  101. Antaniserse you didn’t think I wasn’t gonna get in trouble with the clock *again* did you? ;)
  102. kcacgt (30) (30) But then white can win the c7 pawn at least
  103. TaielChess typical antaniserse
  104. Antaniserse Caissa bless those 45 seconds
  105. rselwyn perpetual
  106. rselwyn White's got to take the perp
  107. TaielChess nice
  108. TaielChess is antaniserse intending to play for more?
  109. rselwyn does he have Ng4?
  110. kcacgt (33) (32) I dont think so
  111. TaielChess idk but he won more than a minute to think with that little tickle
  112. kcacgt (33) Wow
  113. rselwyn I mean he still has the perp
  114. rselwyn black is slightly zeugzwanged
  115. mcastellani18 really thinking about Ng5, my pawn is so close to promoting it might be worth letting him mop up the queenside
  116. kcacgt (33) Wait, there's a huge threat of Re2+ now
  117. kcacgt (33) After Ng5
  118. rselwyn I think black goes Ng5 and then Re2
  119. rselwyn white is just lost
  120. kcacgt (33) white almost has to play rd2 now
  121. rselwyn Can white go Nf5?
  122. kcacgt (33) That's interesting!
  123. rselwyn Nf5, Re2, Ka3, Kg8!!
  124. TaielChess why did he overpushed, a draw with two remaining games would leave us very well in the match
  125. rselwyn Ne2?
  126. rselwyn (Ne2 the move before)
  127. gokuba Re1
  128. gokuba F3 wnd we win
  129. rselwyn Dont flag
  130. rselwyn f3 re2 and white is toast
  131. rselwyn Nf1?
  132. TaielChess probably Kc5
  133. rselwyn Nf1 hello?
  134. floum gg
  135. TaielChess gg
  136. mcastellani18 i'm surprised there wasn't the perpetual
  137. gokuba gg,Poet8c justice
  138. rselwyn Thanks to both @mcastellani18 and @Antaniserse for dealing with the scheduling problems I created. I appreciate it guys.
  139. rselwyn There was a perpetual. White didnt take it
  140. Antaniserse after all the trouble in the middlegame, that seemed really prosaic... i wanted to play b4 instead of c4, for a moment I thought
  141. Antaniserse it didn't matter, but of course there's that check on e2
  142. mcastellani18 No problem @rselwyn hope all is well
  143. mcastellani18 Having that check is what made me realize I can sac my whole queen side since my pawn was close to promoting
  144. mcastellani18 g5 was terrible on my part haha
  145. mcastellani18 I thought I was getting a queen trap
  146. rselwyn I thought g4 was the beginning of the wrong idea
  147. mcastellani18 I personally don't see g4 was wrong even after playing out the moves
  148. mcastellani18 don't see why**
  149. mcastellani18 My position felt very loose and uncomfortable.
  150. Antaniserse it's unecessary, because the whole point was to take away f5 from your knigh... but if i just take on d5, there's no Knight anymore
  151. Antaniserse so, while apparently "aggressive" it didn't have a proper follow-up
  152. rselwyn Was there a reason you played Kb1?
  153. Antaniserse Bf4+
  154. Antaniserse i didn't want that in-between move
  155. mcastellani18 I was saving Bf4 for the right moment so I thought Kb1 was good
  156. rselwyn Oh i missed that idea
  157. Antaniserse of course SF doesn't care and just says "get back the pawns dummy", but at this point i wasn't too concerned with that
  158. mcastellani18 I thought you would win back the h4 pawn and eventuallly the f6 pawn around move 22 and it would just be even
  159. mcastellani18 an idea I was scared of was 31. Ng4
  160. Antaniserse the best moment was after Rd7, because Black doesn't have many usefull moves there, and i could even go back to f5
  161. Antaniserse going for the same idea as the game, but without that pawn that was decisive
  162. mcastellani18 I practically can't move after Rd7
  163. mcastellani18 Thanks for the game, good luck in the rest of the league
  164. Antaniserse same
  165. mcastellani18 I'm studying this game on lichess.org/study/90QOnF1a