lichess.org
Donate
30:00
30:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.3
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1d4+0.3Nf6+0.22c4+0.2e6+0.23Nf30.0Bb4++0.54Bd20.0Qe7+0.55e3+0.3O-O+0.56Bd3+0.5Bxd2++0.57Nbxd2+0.1d6+0.18O-O+0.3e5+0.29dxe5−0.2dxe5−0.110Qc20.0Nbd7−0.111Ne40.0Nxe40.012Bxe4+0.1g60.013Rfd1−0.4c6−0.214Qc3−0.2a5−0.215b3−0.4Nc5−0.316Bc2−0.8Bg4−0.917e4??−3.8...Blunder. Rd2 was best.17.Rd2Bxf317...Bxf3?!−2.6Inaccuracy. Qf6 was best.17...Qf618.Kf1Bxf3[...]18Qxf3−2.6Ne6−2.719Rd2−2.5Nd4−2.420Qg3−2.7Rfd8−2.721Qc3??−8.1...Blunder. Kh1 was best.21.Kh1Rd621...Nf3+−7.822Qxf3−8.0Rxd2−7.923Bd3−8.3Rd8−8.124Bf1−8.3Qc5−8.225h4−8.3h5−8.626Be2−8.3Kg7−8.327g4−8.2hxg4−7.928Qxg4−8.3R8d6−7.929Kg2−8.2Rf6−8.530Rf1−8.4Rf4−8.7
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/4AbkFvrq"] [Date "2022.03.26"] [White "Grizzzly1000"] [Black "JacksterThePro"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "4AbkFvrq"] [UTCDate "2022.03.26"] [UTCTime "19:34:22"] [WhiteElo "2083"] [BlackElo "2406"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-4"] [BlackRatingDiff "+5"] [BlackTitle "FM"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "1800+30"] [ECO "E11"] [Opening "Bogo-Indian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Bb4+ 4. Bd2 Qe7 { E11 Bogo-Indian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation } 5. e3 O-O 6. Bd3 Bxd2+ 7. Nbxd2 d6 8. O-O e5 9. dxe5 dxe5 10. Qc2 Nbd7 11. Ne4 Nxe4 12. Bxe4 g6 13. Rfd1 c6 14. Qc3 a5 15. b3 Nc5 16. Bc2 Bg4 17. e4?? { (-0.92 → -3.82) Blunder. Rd2 was best. } (17. Rd2 Bxf3) 17... Bxf3?! { (-3.82 → -2.57) Inaccuracy. Qf6 was best. } (17... Qf6 18. Kf1 Bxf3 19. Qxf3 Qxf3 20. gxf3 Ne6 21. Rd2 Rfd8 22. Rad1 Rxd2 23. Rxd2 Kf8 24. Ke2) 18. Qxf3 Ne6 19. Rd2 Nd4 20. Qg3 Rfd8 21. Qc3?? { (-2.66 → -8.11) Blunder. Kh1 was best. } (21. Kh1 Rd6) 21... Nf3+ 22. Qxf3 Rxd2 23. Bd3 Rd8 24. Bf1 Qc5 25. h4 h5 26. Be2 Kg7 27. g4 hxg4 28. Qxg4 R8d6 29. Kg2 Rf6 30. Rf1 Rf4 { White resigns. } 0-1
01
Grizzzly1000FM JacksterThePro
01
Grizzzly1000 −4
0 Inaccuracies
0 Mistakes
2 Blunders
44 Average centipawn loss
85%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
JacksterThePro +5
1 Inaccuracy
0 Mistakes
0 Blunders
15 Average centipawn loss
95%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Bogo-Indian Defense: Nimzowitsch Variation
  1. Grizzzly1000 this track with your knight - Ne6 - Nd4... i saw it too late
  2. CM JacksterThePro yes, it becomes a classic bad bishop vs great knight
  3. CM JacksterThePro i think e4 was a bit too quickly played from you
  4. Grizzzly1000 i didnt liked Bxf3 gxf3
  5. CM JacksterThePro i thought perhaps Nxe5 Bxd1 Rxd1 offered some chances with a pawn for the exchange and Ng4-f6/h6 ideas
  6. CM JacksterThePro right, i think i am better if i get to take the knight aswell
  7. Grizzzly1000 i was thinking a bit about Nxe5 Rxd1 - but i didnt saw anything for me
  8. CM JacksterThePro Yeah, i thought it was good for black, but figured e4 was more or less positonally lost
  9. CM JacksterThePro but maybe you should allow the gxf structure instead
  10. Grizzzly1000 would be the better solution when i see Ne6 - Nd4 earlier
  11. CM JacksterThePro Right
  12. Grizzzly1000 21. Kh1....
  13. CM JacksterThePro yes i thought kh1/f1 had to be played
  14. CM JacksterThePro so many tricks in the air
  15. CM JacksterThePro i was planning some Qb4 or a4 move against that
  16. Grizzzly1000 sometimes its so easy... - i had to avoid the check
  17. CM JacksterThePro exactly
  18. CM JacksterThePro btw, earlier i think maybe there is also some room for improvement
  19. CM JacksterThePro like 7.Qxd2 i also looked at before the game
  20. CM JacksterThePro 7.Qxd2 d6 Nc3 e5 Bc2
  21. CM JacksterThePro your knight is better placed and you can even try to castle long in some lines after bg4
  22. Grizzzly1000 i will have take a deeper look on this - dont know why, i am always playing Nxd2
  23. Grizzzly1000 for me its the logical move because of development
  24. Grizzzly1000 but your variation l ooks interesting
  25. CM JacksterThePro yes, but in fact the queen is not bad on d2 and the knight is usually much better on c3 in these lines
  26. CM JacksterThePro anyway, its a small neuance, but maybe something to take a look at
  27. CM JacksterThePro btw did you calculate 13...f5 in the game
  28. CM JacksterThePro i was looking at it and thought i could maybe win a pawn, however the resulting position would be unclear
  29. CM JacksterThePro like f5 Bd5+ Kg7/h8 with the threat of c6
  30. Grizzzly1000 my idea was Bd5+ the threat with c6 i dont know at the moment how to handle it...
  31. CM JacksterThePro right, i saw some conitunation like this for you: f5 Bd5+ Kg7 c5 c6 Bb3 Nxc5 Qc3
  32. CM JacksterThePro or bc4, and my bishop on c8 was a bit akward in those type of postions
  33. Grizzzly1000 looks you saw much more than i here
  34. Grizzzly1000 whats about 9. Qc2?
  35. Grizzzly1000 didnt liked this because of 9... Bg4
  36. CM JacksterThePro Hmm, interesting, maybe some Ng5-e4 idea against that?
  37. CM JacksterThePro that is what i can see in the masters database at least
  38. CM JacksterThePro seems like maybe it is smart to throw in Qc2 first if i have to throw in Re8
  39. CM JacksterThePro compared to our game
  40. Grizzzly1000 now i had an idea to 13... f5 - whats about 14. Bd5 Kg7 15. Nd2?
  41. CM JacksterThePro yes i looked at that, i thought f5 and then you have to go c5 anyway maybe
  42. CM JacksterThePro sorry e4*
  43. Grizzzly1000 15... e4 16. Qc3+
  44. CM JacksterThePro yeah maybe it is clever
  45. Grizzzly1000 found that without engine now...
  46. CM JacksterThePro right
  47. Grizzzly1000 but its unclear for me
  48. Grizzzly1000 you have the c6-threat again
  49. CM JacksterThePro i think if i go Qf6 and we trade i remain the c6 threat
  50. CM JacksterThePro like if Qf6 Qxf6 Kxf6/Rxf6
  51. Grizzzly1000 fear it leads to nothing for me - always have to play c5 then and this pawn is gone
  52. CM JacksterThePro yes
  53. CM JacksterThePro that is why i thought maybe keep knight on f3, because then Qc3 ideas can be more annoying to hit e5
  54. CM JacksterThePro Maybe, anyway i thought it was an interesting possiblity. In the game maybe 16.Nd2 is your way to avoid the bg4 nastyness
  55. CM JacksterThePro then some bc2 with ne4 if you are allowed
  56. Grizzzly1000 i looked at it - but 16.... f5 17. Bc2 e4
  57. CM JacksterThePro right
  58. CM JacksterThePro maybe a3 b4 idea then?=
  59. Grizzzly1000 yes you are right -
  60. CM JacksterThePro not sure, have not looked with engine yet
  61. CM JacksterThePro but seems like you are in time
  62. Grizzzly1000 it looks like i am a bit paralyzed after e4 and so i didnt thought about it longer
  63. CM JacksterThePro yeah i get that
  64. Grizzzly1000 but - its better than what i did - 17. e4? was a big mistake
  65. CM JacksterThePro yes
  66. CM JacksterThePro think its lost after that
  67. CM JacksterThePro even if you don't blunder nf3
  68. Grizzzly1000 anyway- i have to go now... thanks for the game and good luc k in next rounds
  69. CM JacksterThePro Thank you for the game Christian
  70. CM JacksterThePro good luck in the coming rounds!
  71. CM JacksterThePro cya
  72. Grizzzly1000 good night, thanks again!