lichess.org
Donate
45:00
45:00
12345678abcdefgh
+0.3
SF 16 · 7MBNNUE
in local browser
1e4+0.3e5+0.12Nc3+0.1Bc5+0.33Bc40.0d6+0.14d30.0h6+0.25Nge2−0.2Nc6+0.36O-O+0.2Na5+0.37Be3?−1.1...Mistake. Na4 was best.7.Na4Nxc47...Bxe3−1.18fxe3−1.3Nxc4−1.09dxc4−1.2Nf6−0.710Nd5?−2.1...Mistake. Ng3 was best.10.Ng310...Nxe4−1.811Qd3−2.4Nc5−2.712Qd2−3.1O-O−3.213Ng3−3.1Be6?−1.2Mistake. f5 was best.13...f514.b4Na4[...]14e4−1.5c6?0.0Mistake. Qg5 was best.14...Qg515.Qe215Nf6+0.0Kh80.016Ngh5+0.2Qb60.017Kh10.0Qxb20.018Nxg70.0Kxg70.019Qf2??−3.8...Blunder. Nh5+ was best.19.Nh5+Kh720.Rab1[...]19...Rh8??−0.1Blunder. Qd4 was best.19...Qd420Rab1??−4.3...Blunder. Rad1 was best.20.Rad1Bxc420...Qd4−3.921Nh5+−4.4Kf8−5.722Qf6−5.6Rg8?!−4.4Inaccuracy. Rh7 was best.22...Rh723.Rxb7Qxc4[...]23Qxh6+?−7.2...Mistake. Rxb7 was best.23.Rxb7Nxb723...Ke7−6.024Rbd1?!−8.4...Inaccuracy. Nf6 was best.24.Nf6Rg625.Qh4[...]24...Qxe4−7.925Rxf7+−9.5Bxf7??#2Checkmate is now unavoidable. Kxf7 was best.25...Kxf726.Qf6+Ke8[...]26Qf6+??−12.0...Lost forced checkmate sequence. Qxd6+ was best.26.Qxd6+Ke827.Nf6#26...Ke8−12.427Ng7+−11.5Rxg7−11.028Qxg7−11.3Ke7−10.329Qg5+−9.9Kd7−6.830Qf6−7.4Kc7??0.0Blunder. Re8 was best.30...Re831.Qxf7+Re7[...]31Qxd6+0.0Kb60.032Rb1+0.0Ka60.033Qxc50.0b60.034Qa3+0.0Kb70.035Qe7+0.0Ka60.036Qxf7−0.4Qxc2−0.337Qf1?−1.7...Mistake. Re1 was best.37.Re1Rd837...Rd8?!−1.0Inaccuracy. Rf8 was best.37...Rf838.Qc1Qd3[...]38Re1−0.5e4−0.439Rc1?−2.0...Mistake. c5+ was best.39.c5+39...Qd3−1.840Qxd3??−7.1...Blunder. h3 was best.40.h3Rd440...exd3−7.041Rd1−7.4Ka5−6.742Rd2−10.2Kb4−9.343h4−9.2Kxc4−10.144Kg1−10.5Kc3−10.445Rf2−10.7d2−10.246Rf3+−11.2Rd3−10.0
0-1
White resigned • Black is victorious
Computer analysisMove timesCrosstableShare & export
FEN
[Event "Rated classical game"] [Site "https://lichess.org/3NwLXUhK"] [Date "2022.06.04"] [White "greysensei"] [Black "bcande01"] [Result "0-1"] [GameId "3NwLXUhK"] [UTCDate "2022.06.04"] [UTCTime "13:59:09"] [WhiteElo "1710"] [BlackElo "1748"] [WhiteRatingDiff "-8"] [BlackRatingDiff "+10"] [Variant "Standard"] [TimeControl "2700+45"] [ECO "C25"] [Opening "Vienna Game: Anderssen Defense"] [Termination "Normal"] [Annotator "lichess.org"] 1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Bc5 { C25 Vienna Game: Anderssen Defense } 3. Bc4 d6 4. d3 h6 5. Nge2 Nc6 6. O-O Na5 7. Be3? { (0.31 → -1.07) Mistake. Na4 was best. } (7. Na4 Nxc4) 7... Bxe3 8. fxe3 Nxc4 9. dxc4 Nf6 10. Nd5? { (-0.68 → -2.12) Mistake. Ng3 was best. } (10. Ng3) 10... Nxe4 11. Qd3 Nc5 12. Qd2 O-O 13. Ng3 Be6? { (-3.12 → -1.25) Mistake. f5 was best. } (13... f5 14. b4 Na4 15. Nc3 Nxc3 16. Qxc3 Be6 17. a4 b6 18. a5 Qd7 19. axb6 cxb6 20. Rfd1) 14. e4 c6? { (-1.48 → 0.00) Mistake. Qg5 was best. } (14... Qg5 15. Qe2) 15. Nf6+ Kh8 16. Ngh5 Qb6 17. Kh1 Qxb2 18. Nxg7 Kxg7 19. Qf2?? { (0.00 → -3.76) Blunder. Nh5+ was best. } (19. Nh5+ Kh7 20. Rab1 Qd4 21. Nf6+ Kg7 22. Nh5+) 19... Rh8?? { (-3.76 → -0.08) Blunder. Qd4 was best. } (19... Qd4) 20. Rab1?? { (-0.08 → -4.30) Blunder. Rad1 was best. } (20. Rad1 Bxc4) 20... Qd4 21. Nh5+ Kf8 22. Qf6 Rg8?! { (-5.56 → -4.37) Inaccuracy. Rh7 was best. } (22... Rh7 23. Rxb7 Qxc4 24. Qe7+ Kg8 25. Rf3 Nxe4 26. Rxa7 Rf8 27. h3 Rg7 28. Qxf8+ Kxf8 29. Ra8+) 23. Qxh6+? { (-4.37 → -7.18) Mistake. Rxb7 was best. } (23. Rxb7 Nxb7) 23... Ke7 24. Rbd1?! { (-5.97 → -8.38) Inaccuracy. Nf6 was best. } (24. Nf6 Rg6 25. Qh4 Rxf6 26. Rxf6 Qxc4 27. Re1 Rf8 28. h3 Kd7 29. Qh7 Kc7 30. h4 Nd7) 24... Qxe4 25. Rxf7+ Bxf7?? { (-9.52 → Mate in 2) Checkmate is now unavoidable. Kxf7 was best. } (25... Kxf7 26. Qf6+ Ke8 27. Qxe6+ Nxe6 28. Nf6+ Ke7 29. Nxe4 Rad8 30. a4 b6 31. Kg1 d5 32. cxd5) 26. Qf6+?? { (Mate in 2 → -12.01) Lost forced checkmate sequence. Qxd6+ was best. } (26. Qxd6+ Ke8 27. Nf6#) 26... Ke8 27. Ng7+ Rxg7 28. Qxg7 Ke7 29. Qg5+ Kd7 30. Qf6 Kc7?? { (-7.43 → 0.00) Blunder. Re8 was best. } (30... Re8 31. Qxf7+ Re7 32. Qf6 Ne6 33. Qf2 c5 34. Qd2 Nd4 35. c3 Nf5 36. Kg1 Qe3+ 37. Qf2) 31. Qxd6+ Kb6 32. Rb1+ Ka6 33. Qxc5 b6 34. Qa3+ Kb7 35. Qe7+ Ka6 36. Qxf7 Qxc2 37. Qf1? { (-0.32 → -1.69) Mistake. Re1 was best. } (37. Re1 Rd8) 37... Rd8?! { (-1.69 → -0.98) Inaccuracy. Rf8 was best. } (37... Rf8 38. Qc1 Qd3 39. h3 e4 40. Kg1 Qd4+ 41. Kh1 c5 42. Rb3 Rf2 43. Ra3+ Kb7 44. Qg5) 38. Re1 e4 39. Rc1? { (-0.40 → -2.05) Mistake. c5+ was best. } (39. c5+) 39... Qd3 40. Qxd3?? { (-1.84 → -7.14) Blunder. h3 was best. } (40. h3 Rd4) 40... exd3 41. Rd1 Ka5 42. Rd2 Kb4 43. h4 Kxc4 44. Kg1 Kc3 45. Rf2 d2 46. Rf3+ Rd3 { White resigns. } 0-1
01
greysenseibcande01
01
greysensei −8
1 Inaccuracy
5 Mistakes
4 Blunders
117 Average centipawn loss
55%Accuracy
Learn from your mistakes
bcande01 +10
2 Inaccuracies
2 Mistakes
3 Blunders
98 Average centipawn loss
57%Accuracy
Recommended puzzle training
Vienna Game: Anderssen Defense
  1. flipiflapi go bcande
  2. bcande01 (4) not sure if that pin would actually be a problem or not but would rather avoid
  3. bcande01 expected evans gambit this is the vienna (?) i don't think i've played against this in months
  4. bcande01 i was certain f4 was coming, but now it looks like it won't be a problem? bxe3, fxe3, Nxc4, dxc4
  5. bcande01 maybe no development is a problem though? (7)
  6. bcande01 (9) Nf6 looks good, but Qg5 hits a pawn w/ check, also allows for Bh3 followup
  7. bcande01 and then i can castle long maybe?
  8. bcande01 Rf3 and i think he is fine
  9. plastic_pusher I don't see any compensation for Wh at all
  10. bcande01 kinda wanna play Qh4 and hit the c4 pawn,
  11. bcande01 need to castle, kick out knight w/ c6
  12. bcande01 (13) don't like this square for my bishop but didn't know where else to put it so
  13. bcande01 gx, Qxh6, not sure how i get any pieces over there...
  14. bcande01 plan is to take b2, get queen to d4 and try to trade queens - all i could come up w/
  15. bcande01 and add an attacker to e4 eventually
  16. bcande01 Rh7 looked ok? but w/ g8 it hits g2
  17. bcande01 Qxe4 makes a threat, Rh8, Qg5, Rg5, not sure where the queen goes
  18. x420noscope (24.Rbd1) I would love to see Rg6 after Qxe4, looks like a nice consolidating move
  19. x420noscope (24...Qxe4) kicks the queen, protects f6, and helps with involving the other rook in the play
  20. x420noscope (24...Qxe4) Ng3 is possible here, but then Qg6 looks good
  21. bcande01 oh no not again
  22. x420noscope (25.Rxf7+) ok missed this one lol
  23. x420noscope (25.Rxf7+) but not sure it's that good for white, very messy position
  24. jippiedoe I was looking at Qf6+, Qxf7 and Nf6+
  25. x420noscope (25...Bxf7) oooooof
  26. bcande01 i think i have ke8??
  27. x420noscope (25...Bxf7) Nf6#:(
  28. x420noscope (26.Qf6+) Qxd6 Ke8 Nf6 no?
  29. jippiedoe Is he getting out now though?
  30. x420noscope (26...Ke8) well Ke8 was only move I think
  31. x420noscope (26...Ke8) and this looks reasonably stable
  32. x420noscope (26...Ke8) the mate threat makes a big difference
  33. x420noscope (27.Ng7+) Kf8 Qh6 Qg6 Ne6+ Ke7 and we should be good
  34. x420noscope (28.Qxg7) Rxg7 should be fine too
  35. x420noscope (37.Qf1) Rf8 cute move
  36. Meeklydim (37...Rd8) Rf8 just to asser dominance
  37. x420noscope (37...Rd8) yep, and the tempo is pretty useful
  38. x420noscope (38.Re1) e4 looks good, I think pushing the pawn is our only chance
  39. x420noscope (41.Rd1) this looks pretty good for black, but b5 cxb5 and Kxb5 is super important
  40. x420noscope (41...Ka5) because then we have connected c-passers and looks kinda winning for black
  41. jippiedoe Isn't this also fast enough?
  42. x420noscope (42...Kb4) I'm not sure, white king also gets there. this is definitely wrong though
  43. x420noscope (43.h4) Kd2, that is
  44. x420noscope (43...Kxc4) R*
  45. Meeklydim (43...Kxc4) Kc3 was probably more accurate in this situation
  46. x420noscope (43...Kxc4) because with connected passers against the rook, there isn't all that much thinking. they just push themselves
  47. x420noscope (43...Kxc4) yeah I don't think the pawn matters too much, but looks like this should be winning as well
  48. jippiedoe As long as you avoid ..Kd5 :)
  49. x420noscope (45.Rf2) lol indeed
  50. x420noscope (46...Rd3) I'm really looking forward to the evaluation graph
  51. x420noscope (46...Rd3) gonna be a rollercoaster
  52. x420noscope gg
  53. greysensei hmm mate in 2 somewhere
  54. bcande01 i didn't see the knight mate
  55. greysensei clearly neither did i ;-)
  56. bcande01 so tiring lol
  57. bcande01 have a good day. i'll analyze later
  58. greysensei you as well
  59. Gingersquirrelnuts gg