Stockfish over >3000 ELO rating!

those games were not played by me, just watch this game for example
http://en.lichess.org/xNXKqSZX

and hover mouse cursor over my nick (I deleted the profile but the ratings are still shown) - I was in top 50 classical, before I started to lag I was in top 50 bullet etc.
Also that 2100 was a lower estimate, I often play on par with players who have up to 2200 fide rating, and on some days even with 2300, but I believe I am mostly around 2100.

Thank you, your comment about the "pure bs" must have settled it, we may now end the discussion.

here all all my games up to December the 24th (zipped PGN library)
http://files.fm/u/ztstgvz

that includes all the links to games online

As I said I deleted my profile so I had to use this one, which has few games not played by myself.

...sure
i also deleted my 2800 profile, its here:
http://en.lichess.org/@/Loxodonta_africana
my fide is 2717 and all the games I've ever played are here:
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=49702

feel free to look through them all for proof of who i am

Oh, so you are the guy who was former Blitz top 1 and barely managed a draw against me. Nice to meet.
Here's our game:

Also your profile links to another man:
www.facebook.com/vgorbonosov

and it is a little undeleted.

I am sorry you are so uninformed that you didn't even knew that only own games can be downloaded in PGN.

No offence to the real Loxodonta, I had less time so no one wanted to risk.

...obviously my post was sarcastic, I'm clearly not Dmitry Andreikin or loxodonta. thats the point numbnuts.

anyways i really don't care anymore.

you thought I am pretending to be someone because you didn't knew that the PGN library I posted pretty much proves that I did not pretend anything

I wouldn't care either if I were you - who will take you seriously after all this name calling, lying etc., they might pretend and be friendly, just to leave some space for genuine discussion (so you don't troll them to death if they disagree with you) because you won't get banned till you literally eat the forum whole as is usual the case, but in effect no one will take anything for real of what you say.

However I will cede some ground - I just played hundred games against latest Stockfish on a four core 3Ghz machine and got kicked worst in my life. Perhaps chess is not so much more complex than checkers that got solved lately and computers really are closing in on - since it appears that you really have to play the best moves just not to lose and there is hardly any place for maneuvering left - I drew just two games.. here they are:
http://en.lichess.org/TQLjywEr (I play Sicilian as black)
http://en.lichess.org/rKWpaL5H (I play as white)

That however still doesn't discard possibility of learning to systematically draw against engines, and the fact that GMs, masters etc. will be more crafty at beating weaker opponents.

lol wow sorry i "trolled you to death" with all 3 comments i made.

if i knew disagreeing with you would lead to this i would have kept my mouth shut. to everyone else, sorry mega and i killed the thread

@Mega
The # of positions in chess is roughly equal to the # of positions in checkers squared (~ 10^41). And, solving checkers was possible by using many computers working continuously from 1989 to 2007.

So, it is safe to say that we are quite far from solving chess with present technology.