Marcin, those haters are not worth it! They are just jealous.
I can see that in reality you are of master strength, at least, and your rating would reflect that in a heardbeat if it wasn't for all those really unfortunate mouse slips!
"yes my game's was inconsistent thats true but it was long ago I am better player now" LOL
The game I posted was from last Monday. It must be great to think you've improved so much in a week.
Furthermore, the game you posted of mine was from nearly 2 months ago. Being how many games I've played in the last 2 months you must have searched hard for that. If you put as much time into studying and playing chess as you did trollbaiting, you'd be an 1800.
Go back to chesscube or wherever you came from. We have standards here.
Also, on a final note, you don't get to determine when a topic is over, only moderators have that ability, sorry.
Marcin85, congrats for winning against that 1700 but if you would consider you as strong as him you have to tie with him for a larger number of games, not only win one game. Sometimes I win against players rated many hundreds higher but I don't tie with them if I play a large amount of games, so then I'm weaker. Also sometimes I lose against many hundred lower rated players, but judging upon only one game is pointless.
This thread is one of the funniest and saddest I've seen for a while.
F the haters
thanks you all those supporting me and yes your rigth MakeDeal and yes it's sad how this thread is going with those haters And I wish to you good play good life.You alll are good players,for all haters hop your life will change or you will change to be a better person for sake of you and your closest family ,friends and those rest that you care off.It's not worth hating somone you don't know because You don't even have I dea how it will change your life,for everything bad that heppend in life of this people don't change your self into monsters or trying to look like haters its Not worth it.I only wanted to get valuation of couple of my gams A good evaluation And I am sorry for all those I offended. I am very nice person And I can apologaize even If you hurted Me a bit so be kind, have good life, good chess fun playing and be mor respctfull and this site will be a better place on this sometims cruel earth.Best Wishes to you all.
Words of advice:
If you want to gauge people's opinion, it's best not to be boastful in doing so. Bragging and claiming how strong you are and how much you've improved, etc. is not going to get you honest opinions, it's going to get you people ready to knock you down off your high horse. Next time you seriously want people's opinion and advice, try asking nicely.
Cheers.
This thread is getting more interesting every day :)
A few years ago I already wrote (on Fics) :
"rating is overrrated".
Some people even cling so much to their rating that they would say : "I am 1682".
Apart from perhaps the english language glitch, you are not your rating.
Rating is just a number, a tool to show your temporary playing strength in a certain pool of chess players.
One can look at chess more broadly, as a mental exercise, and a peaceful and social unification game, and a way to have fun, or to be speechless after a series of beautiful chess moves.
Look at this recent chess news :
http://www.chess.com/news/earth-wind-and-fire-breathing-chess-engines-2166A GM writes a very honest piece about ups and downs in an odd match against Komodo.
Touching and entertaining, I'd say.
@21 lol
@marcin I notice you lost a hundred rating points.
of course it's just bad pairing luck and I think your mouse needs a new battery
To me, a 1300 elo player is weak.
To a 2500-GM, I am weak.
To Carlsen, a 2500 elo is weak.
How is that not acceptable ?
You always have someone better than you (except for a few guys), and you always have someone worst than you.
We're not all equals in front of the chessboards ... If you can't stand that, try something else than chess.
@Marcin85 I browsed through the games you played with Chesscoaching. In all three games you gave away material basically for free, which is a shame. I think if you work on that, maybe ask yourself "Okay, is anything under attack right now?" every time before making a move, you can greatly reduce this.
I also noticed that you rarely castle your king. (I went through a bunch of your recent games just to see if you ever do it, only found one or two instances). I think this is also a factor that can contribute to loses. This is low hanging fruit I think. In the opening phase, I would focus on the development of your pieces, get knights and bishops out, then castle and only then start thinking of offensive play.
I think with a little more solid play, the difference between you and someone rated 200 points higher than you might be very small. So with that and just playing many games, I think you can easily improve your game.