@JonasPradoLobo said in #9:
> All of them are completely annonymous. I am a public personality. So who is exposing who? And I am not acussing anyone. I am not 100% sure on any game that my opponent was cheating. However I think there is a 75% chance on every game. That makes a 0.00610351562% probability that all of them are innocent. I just want to know why any of them are banned because that for me that is statistically impossible. I just want them to rewiew it and explain me why I am wrong. Again no arguments about the games or the players, just some attacks or stuff that is not related to the topic.
you have a title. that's all. Perhaps the oponents you face also may have a profession as noble as yours and they do not deserve to be publicly humiliated. it is not hard to blur or hide the usernames of these people. If any game with 97% accuracy is cheating at your opinion, then you're also not immune to being accused by people who think like you.
> All of them are completely annonymous. I am a public personality. So who is exposing who? And I am not acussing anyone. I am not 100% sure on any game that my opponent was cheating. However I think there is a 75% chance on every game. That makes a 0.00610351562% probability that all of them are innocent. I just want to know why any of them are banned because that for me that is statistically impossible. I just want them to rewiew it and explain me why I am wrong. Again no arguments about the games or the players, just some attacks or stuff that is not related to the topic.
you have a title. that's all. Perhaps the oponents you face also may have a profession as noble as yours and they do not deserve to be publicly humiliated. it is not hard to blur or hide the usernames of these people. If any game with 97% accuracy is cheating at your opinion, then you're also not immune to being accused by people who think like you.