Hi All,
Long time member of the site but I have had enough of Kingscrusher making ridiculous false accusations.
Either he gets banned for a period of time or apologises or I am out of here.
This appears to be the game he is accusing me of cheating if anyone is interested
lichess.org/ixrJ0Gsc/white#12 and the chat can be seen in the tournament lobby below. Much more abuse was given on his stream.
http://en.lichess.org/tournament/dfcxXkTvRegards,
Amadan.
Seconded, this is a totally ridiculous unsupported claim.
if you were a cheater, you would have been banned by now.
His argument that you use a very unusual opening too is pointless aswell
I have no idea who is right, but it does seem a bit unprofessional of KC to be calling someone a cheater before its proven. That said the stream is hilarious right now. KC now putting his reputation on the line saying if he's wrong he'll leave the site.
When I shared my opinion on this issue in KC's twitch chat, I promptly got permabanned.
I merely outlined that the centipawn loss and the move times in this, and more importantly, in THE MANY OTHER GAMES, were not suspicious at all.
I was not listened to, I was told to "piss off".
Banning him seems harsh, but I think the streams featured on the lichess page should definately follow some basic rules, so that a streamer shouldn't be allowed to rant about possible engine abusers and go on biasedly slandering them for more than half an hour. I do not think that this behaviour reflects the lichess playing atmosphere at all.
I hope that at least here I can share my opinion without being banned in the face. Cheers, rondep.
AMADAN can you explain this masterpiece you played against me?
http://en.lichess.org/zQKbvsEb/blackI rest my case, confirmed motor.
Ok, being completely honest, I'd rather see KC gone than AMADAN. KC is just ridiculous one more time, total necessity.
That's my hybrid kings gambit otherwise known as a slip!
That game embarrasses us both!
When ordinary users complain about cheaters and name names, the staff shows up and says let them take care of it. When a youtuber speaks up in public and names names without any proof, no response. Seems fair.
