| General Chess Discussion - Patt - as a result is not the spirit of chess#1 Patt means the opponent's king cannot move into a field where it is not already check. So actual chess rule say it is a tie. This is nonsense, because this king is dead anyway. I hope this rule will b… | Reini |
| General Chess Discussion - How to save and upload a Game in Lichess#8 Thank you all :-) | Reini |
| General Chess Discussion - How to save and upload a Game in Lichess#1 Hi Ladies and Gentlemen, can somebody please explain in easy words, what has to be done to save and upload a game after you have played and it is finished ? I missing a "save-button" in lichess. Thank… | Reini |
| General Chess Discussion - Stockfish Analysis are sometimes very strange#1 I had some really good matches here on lichess. Watched replays and saw suggestons of stockfish in my games which are really not practicable. The questionmark if i played a knight genius-like between … | Reini |
| General Chess Discussion - i cannot believe - in a check my opponet just decided to go for rochade, the tower of him was attack#14 All Right - thank you for clearing up this really complicate Situation. | Reini |
| General Chess Discussion - i cannot believe - in a check my opponet just decided to go for rochade, the tower of him was attack#12 strange - but now i know, --> otherwise easy go for me to win this match | Reini |
| General Chess Discussion - i cannot believe - in a check my opponet just decided to go for rochade, the tower of him was attack#9 Hey Lovlas, nice to see i am Right - consequences ? | Reini |
| General Chess Discussion - i cannot believe - in a check my opponet just decided to go for rochade, the tower of him was attack#6 that means djullem --> in a check (vs Tower, you know what i mean) - now the rules are: I make Rochade ??? to Escape ??? | Reini |
| General Chess Discussion - i cannot believe - in a check my opponet just decided to go for rochade, the tower of him was attack#3 Look i am 48 years old. In good old games i.e. Karpow vs Kasparow in a time 1982 the rules were clear, even 0-0-0 was not possible if only one position between was threatened.- | Reini |
| General Chess Discussion - i cannot believe - in a check my opponet just decided to go for rochade, the tower of him was attack#1 hey whats going on here ???? - my Opponent goes for Rochade in a Position where his Tower was attacked ??? what are the rules here ? | Reini |
| Next |
|---|