Answer the previous question and ask one for the next person.
Example- Player 1- Would you rather always play your favorite opening or never run out of time?
Player 2- I would rather never run out of time. Would you rather lose a game or beat a master.
I'll start- Would you rather have an opening named after yourself or be the champion of your country?
Have a opening named after me.
Would you rather always castle opposite or always castle the same way?
I rather castle to short side.
Would you rather trade queens?
I'd rather keep the queens on the board.
Would you rather win by ugly flagging or lose by artistic checkmate?
I'd rather try to flag opponent on time.
Would you rather try scholar's mate on low rated opponents?
No, because they might surprise me with a stout defense, and my pieces would be misplaced.
Would you sac a rook on a pawn just to open the position around your opponent's king, but you won't have mate right away?
No,because it's very risky sacrifice and also i then will need to fight to king at hard battle.
Would you give mate to opponent with 2 bishops or bishop+knight?
In an endgame 2 bishops & king versus lone king, 2 bishops without a doubt. Mating with a bishop & knight is the hardest mate.
Would you rather have two rooks -vs.- queen and pawn or vice-versa in a middle-game scenario (some minor pieces still present, everything else held equal)?
Two rooks.
Would you rather beat Carlsen in a simul or win $600 in a tournament?
i would rather beat Carlsen
Would you rather never being able to see a mate in one, but always be able to see mates in 5 or more?
