Why the Opposition to Draws?

I've found a startling opposition to draws on this site. Whenever I offer a draw in a draw-worthy position, my draw offer is repeatedly declined. Then when my opponent tries to make progress, they inevitably worsen their position and I end up winning. So I want to know, why the opposition to draws?

cause draws are for girly men

Draws are boring, you should always try to win, gm play is spoiled because they all play for draws.

Usually the player who feels more confident keeps on playing in a drawish position because in blitz there is a good chance you can win. Of course you sometimes overpush and lose but players who do this have usually calculated that playing in drawish positions is beneficial for them in the long run. Playing in completely dead positions is of course a different thing altogether and waste of time for both players.

I agree with Betelgeuze. On my playing level people (me included) blunder a lot, enough to make the appearance of really "dead" positions very rare. You noticed yourself that the position you considered draws did end up being winning... winning for you that is. Hoping for the opponent to blunder is not exactly the way one should play chess, but what can you do?

Sometimes a book draw is easier for 1 side to draw than the other in an equal position.

There are many positions the computer will look at and say, oh that's easily a draw. However 1 side has a very narrow move window where they must play defense very accurately.

Not drawing makes sense a lot of the time...

However when you get down to a position like king and rook vs king and rook, neither side has any chance in hell totally even and the person doesn't take the draw that can be annoying. Although if one of the sides has a minor piece, or pawn I can understand fighting on, and I would do so myself.

"Whenever I offer a draw in a draw-worthy position, my draw offer is repeatedly declined."

The first time your draw offer is declined that means your opponent does not want a draw. When you offer a draw a 2nd time you are distracting your opponent and I call that cheating. When people do this to me they get blocked. Actually they get blocked if they ask for a draw only once. I don't need the distraction when I'm trying to think.

I suggest if you want a draw then try to repeat the position 3 times. If your opponent does not cooperate that means the answer is no. This way you're not distracting your opponent. This is called "being civilized".

I have no tolerance for quitters. If they start a game they should finish it.

Because people are weird.......

I understand everyone who offers a draw when the position calls for it. I think it's polite because not everyone likes to shuffle pieces backwards and forwards endlessly. I don't usually offer draws myself to save time and because i also noticed that most people don't like draws. They have good reason for that, as we discussed.
But i agree that offering draws repeatedly is very annoying.

@BobC Why would you block someone just because they offered a draw just once??