What do you think about my games?Som players underestimated Me and they payed for it

I don't like when players look on your rating and say your weak chess player. Elo rating isn't fully saying your weak or strong chess player it is just track of your chess luck in pairing+ little to say how you handle in your chess games that gives a shadow how strong you are

Well it always depends on who is calling you weak. You and I are both weak for 1800+ players. I don't mind being called weak from a strong player. It's just the undeniable truth.

And I do think that the ELO Rating is a pretty good indicator of the playing strength of someone (as long as the person played a meaningful amount of rated games).

But don't worry: I think a lichess rating of almost 1500 means that you are stronger than the average rating of all people in the world who know the chess rules ;D

If you think I'm weak for players 1800+ this is a game won againts a player ranked 1932 not long ago here but overall I can't keep up this level of play all the time that is true but do you have those kind of games I don't think so I am not accusing you but just I am stating a fact that you wrong, for player 2000+elo yes I never had game of that level but I am much stronger now then couple of days earlier Good nigth and we are'nt on same level scuffi but good luck and hope you get it one day

http://pl.lichess.org/e6vjWAOU6Onh this is this game

@Marcin85 #4

In the example game you won on time, in a lost position.
So that is not a good example of your play imho.

I just had a look. This is a much better example. You win against almost 1800 by trapping the opponent queen, without making serious mistakes. Excellent :

http://en.lichess.org/tuqdWv9K

Marcin85:

If you dont like when players call you a weak opponent why do you call other players weak? Sorry, dont get it....*confused*

By the way: I would say luck is the one side and elo-rating the other side.... ;-)

Best wishes
Nada

Damn you rigth about first game if he had about 20 second more he had won I think it was tournament nerves that got over him and he didn't make it on time ok that is true thanks I overlooked that but on 2 game it's ok I'm weaker with black much weaker

And then you have games like this one:

http://en.lichess.org/a2pKCHNs

Seems like your rating reflects very well the inconsistency of your playing strength. It doesn't matter if you are able to take advantage of a great tactic here and there, it's a matter of doing it consistently that makes someone evaluate how strong you may be. Everyone has a brilliant idea now and then.

Not sure the point of this thread. Do you want us to give you a gold star for beating a stronger player once or twice?

You also have game like this so its no point for you to speak those words http://pl.lichess.org/ghqaBKAz/black

No but I have been noticed and that is the point of this thread A little fame and little talk never hurt nobody and no I don't want a gold star and yes my game's was inconsistent thats true but it was long ago I am better player now